User talk:Winmelgarcia

November 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jamie Herrell has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jamie Herrell was changed by Winmelgarcia (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966375 on 2014-11-30T07:50:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:50, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Notability of Winmel Garcia
The article Winmel Garcia has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. &mdash;Cryptic 01:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page. &mdash;Cryptic 02:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Winmelgarcia, please read Guidance for younger editors
Hi Winmelgarcia. Please never give out any personally identifiable information (name, age, location, school) on Wikipedia – or anywhere else publicly available on the Internet – even to people you know or think you might know in real life. Some sites have ways of restricting access to your personal information; most, including Wikipedia, do not. --Shirt58 (talk) 10:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Mutya Johanna Datul, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Blake Gripling (talk) 06:51, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pia Wurtzbach
Hello, Winmelgarcia. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Pia Wurtzbach, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Pia Wurtzbach to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 03:47, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mutya Johanna Datul. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mabalu (talk) 13:57, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Nomination of Pia Wurtzbach for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pia Wurtzbach is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pia Wurtzbach until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mabalu (talk) 14:05, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 16:01, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vanessa Hudgens. IPadPerson (talk) 03:21, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jodilly Pendre


The article Jodilly Pendre has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Notability not established

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 04:56, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Jodilly Pendre for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jodilly Pendre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jodilly Pendre until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ApprenticeFan work 03:04, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Do not create, add, maintain, insert, or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, such as you did with the article Anne Curtis. Usually, hoaxes will be caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. ApprenticeFan work 14:42, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Do not create, add, maintain, insert, or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, such as you did with the article Tyra Banks. Usually, hoaxes will be caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. ApprenticeFan work 12:03, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Top Model, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ApprenticeFan work 15:31, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

AN/I Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ''Sorry, everyone forgot to note you about this. Feel free to reply at WP:ANI#Winmelgarcia. Thanks! EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 19:05, 10 March 2015 (UTC)


 * I am very concerned that you're making stuff up and putting it in articles. For example, please explain where you got the information in this edit.  It's important you explain this before you edit any other page; if you resume editing before explaining this, I will block you from editing.  I'm not familiar with Top Model, but the claim that you're adding fake info to articles seems pretty strong. --Floquenbeam (talk) 00:42, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent addition of unsourced information to articles, including violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Normally I would have blocked you for a specific amount of time, but in this case you are not only adding unsourced material, you are also adding incorrect and misleading information that contradicts the sources and have not addressed concerns regarding these discrepancies on any talk page in your entire editing history. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:24, 17 March 2015 (UTC)