User talk:Winnie-barkley

A kitten for you!


SunshineSeaspray (talk) 19:09, 23 September 2022 (UTC) 

Welcome!
Hello, Winnie-barkley, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:04, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello, I'm Silikonz-alt. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Environmental Working Group because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you.  Silikonz (alt) 💬 19:16, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Review
Hello! I really liked the sections you added about the skin deep and tap water databases. These sections are very well informed but make sure you say - as of "specific date" the water quality analysis has over 31 million state water records,- because this type of information changes very quickly. Make sure you add a citation in the sentence that states water can be unsafe even if it meets legal standards. "As safe as possible" is not a neutral statement, and is an expansion of the EWG contains resources for consumers (so maybe you can take this part out.) Make sure you add citations to have these statements supported by science. DavidLeopold1 (talk) 19:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Review
I really like your plan to add the skin deep database because it is a super valuable source of information that not many people know about. If you wanted, you could add some pictures if you want. I liked your re-org, having controversies at the bottom makes sense with the flow of the article. In the tap water database section, you could add some sources (third party citation about water standards, water safety). We talked about this with prof but adding an "as of Nov 29, 2022 to the water records number. Maybe you could include the guidelines that the EWG bases it on? It looks good, I really like the sections that you added!! SunshineSeaspray (talk) 19:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)