User talk:Winooo

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:40, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Your recent editing history at Marie Curie shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block. If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Favonian (talk) 18:55, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

I was unaware that I needed to ask permission to correct errors on a Wikipedia page. However, since changing Marie Curie's name back to the moniker the entire planet knows her by - as opposed to a clumsy and hyphenated piece of feminist/PC claptrap - causes so much distress that it is undone before it is even completed, I will cease and desist the effort to publish the simplest truth.Brprivate (talk) 20:33, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Please do not revert others without an explanation
As you've done here. It is simply discourteous. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; talk to me 18:50, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Your edits to Nicolaus Copernicus‎ are rapidly heading towards pure disruption. You need to stop. If you don't, you're likely heading towards WP:ANI and likely a block William M. Connolley (talk) 11:43, 11 November 2011 (UTC)