User talk:Winschoter

Charles Henry Mackintosh
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Charles Henry Mackintosh, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 18:29, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Welcome!
PS. You may also be interested in WikiProject Christianity.

Speedy deletion of Edward denny
A tag has been placed on Edward denny requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ninety:one 22:01, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Christopher James Davis
The sources need to have proper footnotes, as it is not readily apparent which facts and passages the sources support. Moreover, some links which appear in the article do not appear to have any direct connection to Davis. Please read WP:CITE to see how to remedy this situation. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 01:56, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Bull & Patterson
Moi Winschoter, (please respond so if you don't understand Dutch) Ik zag dat je het artikel Geoffrey Bull hebt geschreven. In het artikel komt de rode link George N. Patterson voor. Zou je eens willen kijken of dat dezelfde is als waar het Nederlandse lemma nl:George Patterson over gaat? Het zijn namelijk beide Schotse missionarissen en de kans erop is daarom groot. In beide Nederlandse artikels ben ik er in elk geval wel van uit gegaan. Ik zie het antwoord graag tegemoet als je weer eens op Wiki vertoeft. Davin (talk) 16:45, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)