User talk:WinterSpw

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Rklawton 12:47, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

User:Jimfbleak
Hi, on every edit page it says 'Encyclopedic content must be verifiable'. You therefore need to provide a reference so that the content of your article can be verified and checked that it meets the notability guidelines.  Jimfbleak . Talk to me. 16:18, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: Minor edits
Yeah, I know that I don't "need" to spend the time making minor edits to articles; in reality, I figure I don't "need" to make any edits at all. But my theory is that every minor edit I make helps an article move that much closer to GA or FA status. If me moving an "s" outside some brackets allows someone using AWB to more efficiently or effectively search articles, it might make a big difference in the end product, just as an example. It's the reason I identify myself as a WikiGnome - I don't make minor edits instead of major ones, but I'm perfectly content to make fifty minors on the way to a larger change. PaladinWhite 06:54, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

14 edits
What? Is there some new rule about how many edits I can make that I don't know about? If there is, feel free to post the link.--Zxcvbnm 02:04, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, you could just use the (cur) button next to my first edit instead to identify all my edits at once. No need to go around telling people to stop editing.--Zxcvbnm 02:33, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * You're welcome, I didn't know what it was either until recently. "cur" is short for "current," which means it compares that edit with the current one.--Zxcvbnm 02:40, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

magic number 7
I just noticed that you made some changes to the The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two article. We really need to improve that article with some reliable sources. I've added fact tags to that last section. A pdf is linked from the external links that supports most of those claims but the it is not a reliable source. It would be great to find the actual research papers that make those claims and cite them directly. Action potential t c 04:57, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Why is thoroughbred a proper noun?
Why is thoroughbred, or should I say "Thoroughbred", a proper noun? Just curious. WinterSpw 23:22, 1 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Because it is a proper noun referring to a breed of horse, just like Morgan, Appaloosa, etc... My citation on this is the article on Thoroughbreds at the International museum of the horse: http://www.imh.org/museum/breeds.php?pageid=8&breed=94&alpha=Five  Note the name is ALWAYS capitalized.  It is incorrect to refer to a purebred animal as a "thoroughbred" [sic], the term is only to be used to describe the Thoroughbred horse. Very common error, though, especially among non-horse people.  Montanabw (talk) 23:32, 1 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, any use related to horses must be capitalized...a "throughbred Morgan" is a horse that is half Morgan, half Thoroughbred, NOT a purebred Morgan. Misuse of "thoroughbred" is one of those many examples of sloppy language becoming so commonplace that no one remembers what is correct. But, I will also note that the Thoroughbred breed was one of the first written Breed registries in the world, so it is understandable that the term "Thoroughbred" instead of "purebred" has sort of gotten to be like "Kleenex" for "facial tissue" This dictionary link explains it:  http://books.google.com/books?id=2yJusP0vrdgC&pg=RA3-PA905&lpg=RA3-PA905&dq=purebred+of+thoroughbred&source=web&ots=nXyQjlv408&sig=ReocOrbnIwJ8ZyJV-z9rivrLD5U  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Montanabw (talk • contribs) 23:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Bounding overwatch
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bounding overwatch, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: :. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 04:14, 31 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I was merely moving the context from Bounding Overwatch to Bounding overwatch.. WinterSpw 04:16, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that recently you carried out a copy and paste page move. Please do not move articles by copying and pasting them because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself by this process, follow the instructions at Requested moves. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen.   -- But |seriously |folks   07:17, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, it's another handy feature -- and all free! ;-) -- But |seriously |folks  21:20, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Rome: Total War
Oh thank you so much, I didn't know how to revert all those edits at once. :) Mallerd 18:16, 2 November 2007 (UTC)


 * To revert multiple edits at once, you have to click on the green bullets next to the two edits that contain the vandalized context and then click on the upper button that says "Compare selected versions". Once you have done all that, Wikipedia will be able to allow you to undo those edits. Hope this helps! WinterSpw 23:42, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Your Revert to Freelancer
I noticed that you reverted my work on Freelancer (computer game). Since I wish to better myself, and because I would like to avert a potential revert war, I would like to know what I did wrong, so as to not make that mistake in my next attempt. Larrythefunkyferret (talk) 05:00, 24 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Responded on my talk page. Larrythefunkyferret (talk) 23:43, 24 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Responded again. Thank you for you pantience. Larrythefunkyferret (talk) 03:51, 25 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Responded again. Larrythefunkyferret (talk) 08:01, 25 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Found someone. Details on my talk page. Larrythefunkyferret (talk) 23:33, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

"Heh couldn't help but fix your grammar" -WinterSpw
Thanks, I ususally don't care if someone corrects spelling or grammar. I know certainly that I don't know all of the formal rules of grammar, so I take it on good faith that any edit for spelling or grammar is justified... unless it turns the sentence into nonsense, or changes the meaning. Again, thanks! --Puellanivis (talk) 18:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Lol no problem, but uhm, which article are we talking about? =P WinterSpw (talk) 23:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Oh yea I fixed some misspellings on your userpage. It was pretty minor, but it was pretty distracting to me. Heh I couldn't help but fix it lol. =D WinterSpw (talk) 00:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry, fixed the title again, because I intended it to be a quote. --Puellanivis (talk) 00:07, 27 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Lol. WinterSpw (talk) 00:11, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

My revert (sniper)
My revert was because you blatantly copy and pasted copyrighted material onto a wikipedia page; which is clearly against policy (not to mention the law). So yes...when you do that I can just revert your entire edit. Batman2005 (talk) 16:37, 12 March 2008 (UTC)


 * For your information, I didn't copy and paste, I was reverting some vandalism when I came across this 'Etymology' section that was just deleted altogether along with references. I quickly assumed it was the work of vandals and took the liberty of reverting it. You knew the reference that the text came from, so why didn't you put them on the text? What are references for? They are used to check up on the validity of the text, so you should have cited the text yourself without me having to do it. You can't just go and delete an entire 'Etymology' section because you knew where most of the text came from, and you would be stripping people of their knowledge by deleting that whole thing. I personally did not know where the term 'sniper' originated from, so just cite it if you think it's plagiarism. Thank you. WinterSpw (talk) 21:11, 12 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Lifting the entire text from a page, putting it on wikipedia, and then citing it to that page unchanged IS still against the "no copyright" policy. The common practice on this project, to avoid legal trouble, is to immediately delete potions (or all of pages) that are copyrighted material.  That's what I did.  I'm sorry it ruffled your feathers, but that's just the way it is.  If you didn't originally put it there...fine, then I'm not sure why you're getting all hot and bothered by it. Batman2005 (talk) 23:01, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Spogs
They are the bobbly ones out of liquorice allsorts but (I dunno maybe its specific to Yorkshire) its used as a generic term for sweets aswell. Joe p15 (talk) 00:31, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Revert in Limited liability company
Your (canned) note to me claimed I removed content from the article, though I did no such thing. The "i.e." as used in that bullet point was wrong. If you don't like my change, feel free (obviously) to go with something else. But don't revert the article to a grammatically worse version, especially not if your primary complaint is that I didn't detail the change in the "edit summary" box. (I assume you are in fact examining the changes made, rather than automatically reverting changes without an edit summary.)

Since I do not have a Wikipedia acct, you can reach me at Yahoo - the username is YashaNNNN, where NNNN is the year of the first manned moon landing. (Please don't send another cut & paste note.) 98.199.120.129 (talk) 00:02, 25 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you for contributing to "Limited liability company". However, you changed "(i.e., see Virginia and Delaware LLC Acts)" to "(q.v. Virginia and Delaware LLC Acts)" without giving a coherent reason in the "Edit summary". I don't know what q.v. is, and neither will most people, so I reverted it. If you see my userpage (User:WinterSpw), it says in the first subsection, first line, " Important : If you're going to edit an article, always remember to give a reason for the edit; otherwise it will be assumed to be unsourced and may get reverted." Thanks again. WinterSpw (talk) 16:10, 25 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Sorry I didn't check your user page before making the first change. The very first line of said page is your claim that you fix (i.a.) "grammatically incorrect ... articles."  But if you "don't know what q.v. is," how do you know whether it's correct?  Do you go around reverting other changes just because -you- don't know what they mean?  The ironic thing of course is that you could check WP for q.v. (and be redirected to the page for Latin expressions).  But that's OK - I went back and dumbed down the LLC change - I even included a summary.  And yeah, I am being a total jerk about this... but don't present yourself as a grammar maven if you're not one.  Speaking of which, why didn't you fix the incorrect use of i.e. in the first place?  Didn't you see it was wrong, or are you simply more hung up on reverting changes without edit summaries?  That i.e. error was part of the article at the time of your first revisions, which pre-date mine by at least a week.  :-)   And with that, I will leave you with the last word.  -Yasha  PS.  You will also find i.a. on the Latin expressions list.      98.199.120.129 (talk) 21:48, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Reference section names
The standard name in Wikipedia for a section with mixed inline citation refs and notes is ==Notes and citations== and the standard name for an alphabetical list of sourced uses is ==References==. --mav (talk) 02:30, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Dozens of pages have bits of it, but Citing sources is a good place to start. --mav (talk) 02:35, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of most expensive things
An article that you have been involved in editing, List of most expensive things, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/List of most expensive things. Thank you.JBFrenchhorn (talk) 22:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Disambiguous The Sniper (disambiguation page)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on The Sniper (disambiguation page), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because The Sniper (disambiguation page) is a disambiguation page that only points to a single article, or no articles at all. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting The Sniper (disambiguation page), please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 01:02, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Thanks for creating War of the Rats
You're welcome! It does sound like a very interesting story! Winnifred-Ian-Leonard-Harry-Ellen-Lucy-Marilyn-Ingrid-Nora-Amanda Walter-Ira-Lauren-Lalla (talk) 06:11, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

response to Emperor Yazdegerd III's death
yes, i read through the article by Frank Wong, Pirooz in China at. you can read it at the first line. thank goodness i got the response quickly though because the usage on wikipedia article editing is complicated. Xmlv (talk) 16:38, 17 May 2008 (UTC)


 * so, the reference is approved? that's good. I was saying that it's not easy to use wikipedia using the advanced tools. i could only know how to use the tools in the article editing page. by the time you read this, i had signed in already. Xmlv (talk) 16:51, 17 May 2008 (UTC)


 * actually, it's the difficulty of making use of the wikipedia tools like create an article, linking different languages of articles, needing verifications of photos and so on. i tried to find a communication channel directly to the wikipedia management giving the feedback that it is not user-friendly to the user like me; the complexity nature of the wikipedia. Xmlv (talk) 17:05, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

.... not being user-friendly in the sense that the wikipedia is being complex. let me give you a scenario, there was one time i wanted to create an article about history. as a first timer, i found that i had to read through all those articles only about manipulating article which i knew i had to spend hours or days to do it. so, i gave up.

because of that, i'm not so happy on how wikipedia arranged the tutorial to the beginners. i just wanted to know how to simply create an article, get picture verification, upload picture, the availability of tools on the page of article editing. if you studied IT before, it's like concept of being use-friendly of a software. graphical, simplicity, availability and of course friendly.

Xmlv (talk) 06:41, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

USS George Washington revert
You'll notice from reviewing my contribs, that I reverted that edit not for grammar but for unsourced information, as evidenced by the warning I left on the talk page of the IP that made the edit. Perhaps I should have used twinkle instead of rollback, but still, unsourced information doesn't belong. -MBK004 00:30, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

accuracy of death of emperor yazdegerd III
hi there, not sure if you remember that i have entered the new edit the emperor's death in histoy of Sassanian Dynasty using this reference.

i found another reference here which is from another article of Emperor Yazdegerd III. it directs to.

here's what it says:

"An Arab victory at Al-Qadisiyyah in 636/637 was followed by the sack of the Sasanian winter capital at Ctesiphon on the Tigris. The Battle of Nahavand in 642 completed the Sasanids' vanquishment. Yazdegerd fled to the empire's northeastern outpost, Merv, whose marzban, or march lord, Mahuyeh, was soured by Yazdegerd's imperious and expensive demands. Mahuyeh turned against his emperor and defeated him with the help of Hephthalites from Badghis. The Hephthalites, an independent border power, had troubled the Sasanids since at least 590, when they had sided with Bahram Chubin, Khosrow Parviz's rebel general. A miller near Merv murdered the fugitive Yazdegerd for his purse."

so, i don't know which one shows the historical evidence is more accurate of the emperor because the former emperor death was not stated clearly? i felt that the article seems to be having political motivated? Xmlv (talk) 16:59, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Xmlv (talk) 08:44, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * actually, i did mention that issue in that talk page and of course there is no response so far. just that, i'm thinking if there is help around the forum, i would take the advantage to do so. now that i know what you are capable with something, so it's ok. nice talking to you.

The big clue: it says © on the bottom of the page it ws copied from
Sorry, when it says ©Steven Jeffery / IBList.com, 2008 on the page it is copied from it's up to you to provide more than your say so that it isn't copyrighted. --Blechnic (talk) 05:43, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

The article " Sniper " and mention of Norwegian specialforces
I see that the info I posted regarding the range of one shot fired by a Norwegian specialforces soldier and the source of this info has been labelled with " ".

The info is correct and the article is siting sources within the Norwegian armed forces. The insident has actually been under investigation in Norway. Not because of the range of the shot, but because of the ammo used. it is normally not intended for soft human targets. If there was any false info regarding the range, I'm sure that that also would have been adressed. This source is in Norwegain, but I don't see how that can be a negativity to the article. If we were only to site English sources and regard that as the only truth in the world, then we would all have a serious problem. Please remove the label. Mortyman (talk) 01:43, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Requests for assessment
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 01:12, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Haymarket affair
Hello. I saw that you added a "Verify source" tag to the statement in the article that the bomb blast and ensuing gunfire resulted in the deaths of eight police officers and an unknown number of civilians. According to Template:Verify source, that template is intended to be used when a statement is doubtful. What portion of the sentence do you think is doubtful? Do the references in Haymarket affair allay your concerns? Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 23:48, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikilove listed at RfD
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikilove. Since you had some involvement with the Wikilove redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Telephonedennis  talk  16:28, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Tunnels Wiki Project Proposal
I saw your comment on Tunnels. Care to join me in starting a WikiProject Tunnels? Comments accepted at WikiProject Council/Proposals/TunnelsPustelnik (talk) 23:47, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Şanizade
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Şanizade, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/ebm/record/15053015/abstract/%5BA_review_of_Sanizade_Mehmed_Ataullah_Efendi%27s_book:_Kanunu%27l_Cerrahin%5D, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Şanizade and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Şanizade, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Şanizade with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Şanizade. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Şanizade saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:27, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pioneers in Engineering


A tag has been placed on Pioneers in Engineering requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cindy (need help?) 05:30, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Pioneers in Engineering Logo 1.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Pioneers in Engineering Logo 1.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:38, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Your addition to Pioneers in Engineering has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Cindy (need help?) 16:30, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Pioneers in Engineering, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ''If you have questions regarding edits which have been made to bring the article into compliance with the encyclopedia's policies and guidelines, please feel free to contact me or ask questions on the article's talk page. '' Cindy (need help?) 08:05, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pioneers in Engineering


The article Pioneers in Engineering has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * non-notable STEM nonprofit

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  T K  K  bark  !  12:34, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pioneers in Engineering concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pioneers in Engineering, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:10, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Pioneers in Engineering staff and students at scrimmage 2012.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pioneers in Engineering staff and students at scrimmage 2012.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:43, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:PiE Staff and Students 2012.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PiE Staff and Students 2012.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:43, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree files
See Possibly unfree files/2013 October 31. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:26, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pioneers in Engineering


Hello WinterSpw. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Pioneers in Engineering".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:00, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Recent world conflicts listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Recent world conflicts. Since you had some involvement with the Recent world conflicts redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:14, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Present-day world conflicts listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Present-day world conflicts. Since you had some involvement with the Present-day world conflicts redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:14, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

List of world conflicts listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of world conflicts. Since you had some involvement with the List of world conflicts redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Current world conflicts listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Current world conflicts. Since you had some involvement with the Current world conflicts redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Continuing world conflicts listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Continuing world conflicts. Since you had some involvement with the Continuing world conflicts redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Magnitude scale
Hello WinterSpw,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Magnitude scale for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Seismic scale, amongst others..

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jamesbushell.au (talk) 22:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Axis & Allies (2004 video game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Band of Brothers ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Axis_%26_Allies_%282004_video_game%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Axis_%26_Allies_%282004_video_game%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Macromanagement (gameplay), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Resource planning ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Macromanagement_%28gameplay%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Macromanagement_%28gameplay%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Your addition to Macromanagement (gameplay) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. ''AI section copied from http://www.idi.ntnu.no/~agnar/publications/iccbr09-games-ws.pdf Analysis section copied from http://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/128576/thesis_final.pdf'' Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 22:50, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Opponent modeling


Hello, WinterSpw. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Opponent modeling".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:07, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

"Molybdenom" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Molybdenom. Since you had some involvement with the Molybdenom redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC)