User talk:Wiredbee

Welcome
Hello, Wiredbee, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  13:48, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Content about living people
Hello, I'm TheRedPenOfDoom. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  13:48, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * you cross referencing content to prove something is completely inappropriate and not acceptable for any content of any article. Specific claims, particularly those involving living people must have been made and documented in reliable third party sources with a reputation for fact checking and accuracy and then must still be presented in an appropriate neutral fashion. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  14:44, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

content pushing a point of view
it appears that all of your content contributions at Bunker Roy and Barefoot College are simply designed to push a particular point of view and make a commentary about the subjects. Such editing is not allowed at Wikipedia. You need to present content from reliable sources in a manner that does not make or advance claims not specifically made by any indiviudal source. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  15:39, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * You have links to external sites, but none of them are reliable sources. You are making claims that the "sources" do not make" and as is stated at the top of every editing box "Work submitted to Wikipedia can be edited, used and redistributed by other people at will." - so yes, I DO have a right. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  16:10, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

BLP Noticeboard
Your edits to Bunker Roy are being discussed [] Please respond. 78.86.229.157 (talk) 14:27, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  14:29, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Bunker Roy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  15:15, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Bunker Roy
You keep removing the cited content of Barefoot College having trained 3 million students. as of yet, the closest to an explanation you have cited is that the author of that bio in the reliable source Time has come under question for other claims they have made. However, you cannot continue to edit war over that claim without providing some evidence that this source and this claim should be questioned when Time is obviously well aware of the events surreounding the author and has not posted any correction. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  02:10, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Please state your case on the article talk page as a centralized location for all editors involved. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  02:18, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Claims about living people
as a reminder, the WP:BLP policy applies not only to article content, but also to content placed on talk pages. In the future, please refrain from potentially libelous claims such ""biggest con artist" unless you have reliable sources to support such claims. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  21:14, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Barefoot College
Articles with good quality sources and a neutral point of view can never be disputed among wikipedidia users. Annette46 (talk) 05:51, 24 November 2012 (UTC)