User talk:Wirterss

Speedy deletion declined: Ju Ming
Hello Wirterss. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ju Ming, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. PhantomSteve/ talk ¦ contribs \ 11:50, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ju Ming has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:24, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ju Ming was changed by Wirterss (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964192 on 2018-07-23T14:24:04+00:00.

Inappropriate changes to Ju Ming article
Please stop trying to rewrite the Ju Ming article to be about a completely different person. This is disruptive editing. If you want an article about a different person with a similar name, please create a new article. You can distinguish them by adding a short description after the name in the title of the new article. If you continue rewriting the existing article in this way, you should expect to be blocked from editing. --RL0919 (talk) 14:36, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ju Ming, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 14:40, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ju Ming. Ifnord (talk) 14:40, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. RL0919 (talk) 14:44, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

朱哲 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 朱哲. Since you had some involvement with the 朱哲 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GZWDer (talk) 12:52, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Zhu Zhe listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Zhu Zhe. Since you had some involvement with the Zhu Zhe redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GZWDer (talk) 12:52, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

朱明 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 朱明. Since you had some involvement with the 朱明 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GZWDer (talk) 12:53, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
GZWDer (talk) 13:01, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Zhu Ming (thinker)
Draft:Zhu Ming (thinker), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Zhu Ming (thinker) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Zhu Ming (thinker) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. GZWDer (talk) 13:07, 24 July 2018 (UTC)


 * It does not help to prove the notability of the person by using this source 中国历史上的十大才子：看看你能说出来几个 and a fake trans-title. It is very self-promotional if claiming him as the top 10 Chinese genius in literature. Matthew_hk   t  c  02:15, 28 July 2018 (UTC)