User talk:WisR Fan

Welcome!
Hi, WisR Fan. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Csgir (talk) 12:24, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Hello WisR Fan. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to WisR, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:WisR Fan. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Csgir (talk) 12:24, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of WisR


A tag has been placed on WisR, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Celestina007 (talk) 12:27, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of WisR for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WisR is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/WisR until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 12:52, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Response to Csgir and Celestina007
Hi Csgir. I'm new to Wikipedia. I'm just interested in the company and thought they deserved a page although now reading the information on "notable companies", I can understand how this company may not apply under that criteria and I should have followed the "first articles" guidelines. I do not receive financial compensation or am affiliated with this company. To Celestina007, if the article needs to be deleted, I understand. I would however to like to continue copy editing on wikipedia if I can so if this is possible Csgir, please let me know.

WisR Fan (talk) 08:30, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * courtesy ping to named editors KylieTastic (talk) 15:35, 23 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Since you are not blocked, there is no reason why you shouldn't continue copy editing. First, however, you should provide some evidence that WisR indeed released their logo, File:WisR GmbH Logo.png, under a free license that allows unlimited re-use. How do you know that? I couldn't find anything about copyright or the scope of re-use permissions on their press page. Huon (talk) 16:48, 23 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello thanks for writing. There is no reason why you should not continue editing here. There are hits and misses in the beginning. We all have had our share. Happy holidays to you! Csgir (talk) 06:22, 24 December 2019 (UTC)


 * In response to Huon, I just assumed that since it was on the press page, it was available for re-use but I guess that isn't explicitly stated on the website. Thanks for pointing that out.