User talk:WisdomToothless

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Trapped in the Closet has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 07:30, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Big Brother 2010 (UK). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tomd2712 &#124;  Tell me something?  07:48, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Big Brother 2010 UK
Hi WisdomToothless, I removed the exit day for Ben because he left the House as part of a task set by Big Brother. Only when a Housemate leaves via the eviction process, walked or has been ejected is when an exit day is added. When Big Brother brings back an ex-Housemate is when a second entered date is added. Since Ben left the House as part of a task he is still an official Housemate and therefore he technically was still a Housemate and the exit date isn't counted. The same is with Charley from BB8 UK as she left because of fake week. She was still a Housemate and her eviction interview was controlled by Big Brother and Davina was limited on what she could reveal to Charley. If you believe that exit dates should be applied to when Big Brother lets a Housemate leave the House as part of a task please start a discussion so a consensus can be reached. However the outcome will affect other Big Brother articles as well. Thanks.  ♪♫Al ucard   16♫♪  10:16, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Gabourey Sidibe. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 13:53, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello WisdomToothless, and welcome to Wikipedia. I hope that you have enjoyed contributing and want to stick around. Here are some tips to help you get started: If you need any more information, plenty of help is available - check out Questions; ask your question here and attract help with the code ; or leave me a message on my talk page explaining your problem and I will help as best as I can. Again, welcome! strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 14:31, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Learn the basics by reading the introduction and taking the tutorial.
 * Remember to sign messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ) to automatically insert your username and the date.
 * Enjoy editing to improve articles, but try to leave an edit summary to explain what you are doing.
 * Create your first article using the Article Wizard to help avoid common mistakes, which may lead to article deletion.
 * Although you don't need to be familiar with all of Wikipedia's policies, try to keep to the core principles and basic guidelines.
 * When dealing with fellow Wikipedians, please remain polite, solve problems calmly, and remember that no-one is out to get you.
 * Get involved with the community by joining a WikiProject.
 * Make any test edits in the sandbox or click here and create a sandbox of your own.
 * If you are having difficulty, consider finding a mentor to give you more personal advice.
 * If in doubt, be bold. If you make a mistake, it can easily be reverted.

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive uploads. The next time you upload an inappropriate image, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 14:39, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Artel Jarod Walker


The article Artel Jarod Walker has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * '''This actor appears to fail our notability guidelines WP:ACTOR. There also appear to be no solid sources whatsoever.

There are some edits in the history of this article claiming that this person is also known as "Artel Kayàru" or "Artel Great!" (an identification imdb also makes), although a new editor has disputed this. I can't verify that these persons are the same. And, in any case, none of their alleged alternative names seems to yield any solid sources to give us material to write an article, or to testify to notability.

The identification is an interesting puzzle, but ultimately may be irrelevant as this fails our guidelines anyway.


 * Please note, File:Ajw2.JPG purports to identify Walker, and may need removed if this can't be established.'''

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Scott Mac 13:53, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Artel Jarod Walker for deletion
The article Artel Jarod Walker is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Artel Jarod Walker until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Scott Mac 16:25, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Recreating deleted articles
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template hang on underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Nakon 07:31, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Nakon 07:33, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Nakon 07:35, 1 January 2011 (UTC)