User talk:Wisdomspeaks

Notability of Bishop Sherrod Char-Lotte (S.C.) Johnson
A tag has been placed on Bishop Sherrod Char-Lotte (S.C.) Johnson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. De728631 (talk) 18:00, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Bishop Sherrod Char-Lotte (S.C.) Johnson
A tag has been placed on Bishop Sherrod Char-Lotte (S.C.) Johnson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Woland (talk) 19:35, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Bishop Sherrod Char-Lotte (S.C.) Johnson
A tag has been placed on Bishop Sherrod Char-Lotte (S.C.) Johnson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  Jamie ☆ S93  12:13, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Church of the Lord Jesus Christ
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Accurizer (talk) 12:29, 14 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I see you have now prefaced the material that you added with "From Wisdomspeaks". Does this mean that this is your original work? Original works are not allowed in Wikipedia, in accordance with this policy. If you cannot provide citations to one or more reliable sources for this information, it will have to be removed. Accurizer (talk) 16:50, 14 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The edits you have made appear to carry a non-neutral point of view. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. I have made minor changes to begin correcting the problem but significant clean-up work still needs to be done and I have tagged the article accordingly. Please be sure to always observe the neutral point of view policy. Thank you. Accurizer (talk) 19:28, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Copyright violation in Bishop Sherrod Char-Lotte (S.C.) Johnson
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the article Bishop Sherrod Char-Lotte (S.C.) Johnson, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition was deleted under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:51, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article.   SIS   21:22, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, your edits will be considered vandalism and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.   SIS   21:47, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Church of the Lord Jesus Christ and Twelve Apostles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, your edits will be considered vandalism and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.   SIS   11:56, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Trying to help
With all due respect for your faith and beliefs, you can't just keep adding the same unsourced claims to the articles again and again. There are no 3rd party references in your additions, they are also considered non-neutral and POV, and it could possibly also be labeled as original research. Three things WP frowns upon. Your edits will just be reverted again. If you continue like this, you might even get yourself blocked from editing. Please read the WP guidelines mentioned in the warnings above for more info. Thanks,   SIS   12:22, 21 September 2008 (UTC)