User talk:Wisdood

Clean up after move
When you move, such as Le prophète (opera), can you please "clean up", that is fix the links? I did one for you, in the navbox at the bottom of that page, where only proper matches are found, not redirects. I have no time for more. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:39, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The situation Wisdood created is a mess. The entry for the opera on the disambiguation page Le Prophète redirects to itself, the disambiguation page. The move was unnecessary and I'm going to initiate a WP:RM to restore the previous article name. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of CRP Radios


The article CRP Radios has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of WP:notability. Just seems to be a link to a non English article on another language wikipedia. Not appropriate here."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 09:48, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Priya Varrier


A tag has been placed on Priya Varrier, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Let There Be Sunshine 15:44, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi,Can we go for a Wikipedia:RFUD at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion ? The makers of film are using the actress page for promotion via redirect.  Stalin SunnyTalk2Me 14:49, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Triple Degree listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Triple Degree. Since you had some involvement with the Triple Degree redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed,Rosguill talk 17:21, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SMIB


A tag has been placed on SMIB requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 06:42, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Legacy of Taras Shevchenko, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shevchenko Park. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Wisdood

Thank you for creating Mariupol siege.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;    (contact)   08:17, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Bagram
Please wp:cite a wp:reliable source (RS) for your edit to Bagram. This is needed per wp:verifiability. See help:referencing for beginners. I can see that it might be considered "abandonment", but an RS needs to make that statement. The "Reports of the area claim that the NRF killed the Bagram district chief, the Taliban did not confirm or deny the reports." did not appear to be sourced, so I removed it. If you know of a source, please restore the info with the source. Or, let me know on my talk page and I'll replace it with your source. Please help keep Wikipedia verifiable! It's the only way the encyclopedia has any credibility. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 09:59, 16 June 2022 (UTC)


 * I am not a Wikipedia beginner.
 * I will look for sources. I do not want to make a political statement against the Joe Biden administration.
 * By the way you have deleted all my changes in the article. Wisdood (talk) 10:08, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The NRF attack was reported by an anonymous Wikipedian - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bagram&diff=prev&oldid=1069169988 Wisdood (talk) 10:10, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I have not found any source for the NRF attack (in January 2022 ?). Absolutely nothing
 * BBC talked about the July evacuation - I have added the details in the article now and also in the article discussion Talk:Bagram. Wisdood (talk) 12:10, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

RTM
Hi, I saw that one of your edits was undone here by @SandyGeorgia. I just wanted to check with you that you understand why your edit was undone and what is meant by RTM. If you need any help, feel free to give us a shout. Dr. Vogel (talk) 14:59, 18 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you. But actually I am not interested to know more about her action and whereabout of it, mainly because in my point of view, an encyclopedia is an encyclopedia... Wisdood (talk) 15:18, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The info is at MOS:DABRED. (Thanks for filling in here.) Sandy Georgia  (Talk)  16:30, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, you have a red-linked account that doesn't match your username, so that ping will be a miss. Sandy Georgia  (Talk)  16:40, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I know :) Dr. Vogel (talk) 03:22, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

"VidPrevtyn Beta®" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address a potential problem with the redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=VidPrevtyn_Beta%C2%AE&redirect=no VidPrevtyn Beta®] and it has been listed for discussion. Anyone, including you, is welcome to participate at until a consensus is reached. Clovermoss 🍀 (talk) 01:09, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Wisdood. Thank you for your work on Jungle Railway. User:Fork99, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Fork99 (talk) 10:58, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

"LancetGate" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LancetGate&redirect=no LancetGate] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 18:25, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Jersey people
Thank you! J S Ayer (talk) 22:01, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Polar Wolf (disambiguation)


The article Polar Wolf (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Invalid and unnecessary disambiguation page which contains the primary topic and only one other topic."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 00:36, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ditidaht (disambiguation)


The article Ditidaht (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Invalid and unnecessary disambiguation page containing the primary topic and only one other topic."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 04:03, 4 February 2024 (UTC)