User talk:Wisemanstudios

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Veinor (talk to me) 22:14, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Regarding edits to Suzanne Shell
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Wisemanstudios! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule thetruthistold\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 22:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and will be removed. Thanks. Shadowbot 22:30, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. --Dirk Beetstra T C 22:31, 9 May 2007 (UTC)


 * This is your only warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on Wikipedia and other sites that use the MediaWiki spam blacklist at all.  --Dynaflow   babble  22:33, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. &mdash;dgies tc 22:50, 9 May 2007 (UTC) sorry about my past edits it wont happen again..i thought someone was playing games with me and being new to Wikipedia i didnt know that there were messages for me to be read nor did i take the time to read them till the end..as for shell who can go jump in a lake i will not post anything more about her other then on my website where Wikipedia has no control... again im sorry about my past post and not reading your rules .billy wiseman

Wisemanstudios is using Wiki to alledegly stalk Suzanne Shell
For the editors who check into this user - Wisemanstudios has been engaged in long term Internet stalking, harassment and libel against me, Suzanne Shell, wherever any article is published about me. He is a brain damaged adult (arising from a closed head injury), with a self professed mental capaciy of a 13 year old. I have had to file multitple criminal complaints against him and some of his associates because they have not limited their stalking and harassment to the Internet. He and his assocites have interfered with my business and contractual relationships and attempted to prevent seminars I present in various states. He has engaged in false advertising, misrepresentation and libel where ever he appears. I fear for my safety from this person and his associates at AFRA, and request Wikipedia to take appropriate action to prevent further stalking and harassment by this person relevant to my Wikipedia entryby. Thank you. Dsshell 02:04, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

==im sorry that i didnt read my messages before this and im glad to see what mrs.shell is saying about me and if she has a page posted about herself the link thetruthistold.com is not spam but the whole truth and nothing but the truth about mrs.shell and i felt that the link should be added so the readers can deside about shell with the truth...if you cant have my link in that page so the readers can deside then i thnk that this is not right what do you say??Billy wiseman--Wisemanstudios 09:23, 10 May 2007 (UTC) p.s.im not asking to be unblocked as i dont care you do as you wish as Right now im Thinking about wikipedia and i see that you have violated my right to freedom of speach...did you know thats against civil law? think on that for awhile sir..billy


 * Both of you should be aware of Wikipedia's hard-and-fast policies of no personal attacks (WP:NPA) and no legal threats (WP:NLT). Please try to keep this as civil as you can while you're arguing here.  This is not the Grand Arena; this is an encyclopedia.   --Dynaflow   babble  10:44, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Billy, Billy, Billy...Wikipedia and the law have it out against libel, and that is what your website is, and that is why it is not allowed on Wiki. You post defamatory statements against people-myself included-on your website. Libel is not protected under free speech. You even have an e-mail on your website sent by me to a Tim Shepherd during a time of confusion, but claim it was to someone else I never even talked to even though she made believe I did, plus, the e-mail was even altered before being put on your website to make Suzanne look bad! So you think on that for awhile....sir. And no, I'm not about to sue you for saying nasty, false things about me-I'm used to people lying about me, and that's just water off a duck's back. People will say what they want to say and nothing anybody does will ever change that. Ooops, Sorry, this is 65.185.137.147 10:55, 10 May 2007 (UTC).


 * This now has a thread at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents telling sysops to come take a look at this dispute. Again, there will be no legal threats or personal attacks here, even if you're "right."   --Dynaflow   babble  11:03, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree with User:Dsshell that the link is inappropriate, and even if the link is not libel, it is not a reliable source. Therefore, content policies dictate that it be removed. The First Amendment does not dictate what Wikipedia can and cannot remove; since it is a private project of the Wikimedia Foundation, the First Amendment (which only addresses the government) never comes into play.
 * However, I would also caution Ms. Shell against personal attacks such as this. They are not accepted on Wikipedia either, as Dynaflow has said. Veinor (talk to me) 13:08, 10 May 2007 (UTC)


 * You are warning the wrong person, Veinor. I did not post anything on my Wikipedia entry. This entry was put on there by Billy Wiseman aka user Wisemanstudios. The IP address associated with that anonymous edit belongs to user Wisemanstudios. I have never engaged in any edits on the Suzanne Shell Wikipedia entry and any sumbissions I make are always signed. My request to the editors about Wisemanstudios cyberstalking was limited to this talk page. Dsshell 14:08, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Indeed; now that I look at it a bit closer, I notice a bit of attack on the bottom of the page that suggests it was indeed made by Wiseman. My apologies. I have requested a check to see if that IP does indeed belong to User:Wisemanstudios. Veinor (talk to me) 16:40, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Checkuser came back inconclusive on that particular IP (see Requests for checkuser/Case/Dsshell), but did confirm that 66.233.207.183 is Wisemanstudios. However, given this and then this, I conclude that that was indeed Wisemanstudios, and so I have extended his block. Further attempts to evade the block will result in lengthening it. Veinor (talk to me) 20:33, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you from me too, Veinor! I was wondering why you were telling me about linking to Suzanne's page-I've never linked to anything, lol!65.185.137.147 20:36, 10 May 2007 (UTC) Oh, wow, Billy, after reading Veinor's notes, I can conclude that you are WAY off the mark as to who is the above IP!MMHen 21:34, 10 May 2007 (UTC)