User talk:Wisez001

Proposed deletion of David Lussier


The article David Lussier has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No clear indication of notability. Does not seem to pass WP:BIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DES (talk) 15:20, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of David Lussier for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Lussier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/David Lussier until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cindy ( talk ) 22:18, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page David Lussier has been reverted. Your edit here to David Lussier was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZL1gNHXCP0, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZnETBxuCsI) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:16, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

David Lussier
Hey Wisez001. I have reverted your removal of the AfD from the above article. Please note that removing it from the article will do nothing to stop the Articles for Deletion process (though continuing to remove the AfD template from the page could lead to a block from further editing). If you want the article to remain, the number one thing you need to do is find and cite to reliable sources that show notability and verify the article's content.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 06:42, 3 March 2014 (UTC)