User talk:Wishing Lucky Lucke

Speedy deletion nomination of OBBOT


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on OBBOT requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Luke no 94 (tell Luke off here) 18:54, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ''Diffs: Here you introduce unclear language like "A frenchy-nationalled patchwork duckling who joins the cast in Season Two." What does this mean exactly? You also added a number of companies to the infobox without providing adequate sources. This edit looks like intentional vandalism to me. You inexplicably change the name of the series and add a bunch of countries without sources. This edit is also problematic, as you remove content that is sourced, with no explanation or any better source. These edits are disruptive. Other of your edits are disruptive too, for being unsourced and dubious., etc. '' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:31, 15 May 2015 (UTC)