User talk:Wisnie26

April 2016
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! 220  of  Borg 19:16, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Robert "Bob" Carlton Brown, II.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Robert "Bob" Carlton Brown, II.jpg, which you've attributed to Craig Saper. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 11:49, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Piotr Florczyk


The article Piotr Florczyk has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:07, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Piotr. Thank you for your comments on the Piotr Florczyk entry. Please allow me to justify the entry. When posting the entry, I did not intend to write a biography of this person. Instead, Florczyk (under Wikipedia guidelines) is viewed as "notable" because of his literary contributions, especially in the area of translation, which connects him to numerous other notable figures in Poland and the United States. Because of this sort of contribution, like hundreds of other entries long established on Wikipedia listed as "academics" and "creative professionals", secondary criticism of Florczyk's is irrelevant. It is true that some of the external links are not "independent", but others are reliable and offer significant coverage.

I am new to writing Wikipedia entries, and would appreciate your assistance in making this what you deem more worthy. The intention of Wikipedia, as I understand it, is a collective adding, contributing, and sharing. Thanks, Wisnie26 9:47 28, April 2016 (EST) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wisnie26 (talk • contribs)

Nomination of Piotr Florczyk for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Piotr Florczyk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Piotr Florczyk until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:41, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Dear Wisnie; please post (copy) your comment to Articles for deletion/Piotr Florczyk where the deletion discussion will be taking place. On my talk page it won't be seen by many. Cheers, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 14:37, 28 April 2016 (UTC)