User talk:Wissingwm

Your recent edit to the page The Murder Junkies appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you.

January 2012
Your recent edit to the page The Murder Junkies appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Colinclarksmith (talk) 22:52, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Murder Junkies was changed by Wissingwm (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2012-11-02T23:41:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:41, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Allin in the Murder Junkies
Allin was in the Murder Junkies, just as Tom Petty was in the Heartbreakers, etc. The band was not a band independent of Allin. Please, let's let this one be, okay? Best, CCS81 (talk) 21:56, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Murder Junkies was changed by Wissingwm (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2012-11-10T22:45:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:45, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

edit warring on Merle Allin
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Please discuss the changes you wish to make on the talk page for the article instead of repeatedly reverting.Dialectric (talk) 15:08, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.Dialectric (talk) 21:54, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
You have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks for edit warring, as you did at Merle Allin. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:43, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The duration of the block was based on the fact that other editors have attempted to discuss the content dispute with you, and yet you have not made a single effort to participate in that discussion. When this block expires, if you persist in edit warring without discussion or consensus, you risk being blocked indefinitely.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:45, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification
Because of the similarity of recent IP edits to your edits at Merle Allin and The Murder Junkies, I've opened an investigation into your possible block evasion: Sockpuppet investigations/Wissingwm. Dialectric (talk) 13:54, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * For that reason, I've reset your block so it expires two weeks from today. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:46, 30 December 2013 (UTC)