User talk:Wistrich

Conflict of interest
Wikipedia's policy is that articles should be written from a neutral point of view, and that they should not be written in such a way as to be influenced by a particular view. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Article, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit or the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should normally avoid editing articles in which you have an interest. If you do edit articles in which you might reasonably be considered to have a conflict of interest you should exercise great caution. This applies when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:47, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

"Never edit anything else"
Sara, I see that you wrote "Thank you so much I will never ever edit anything else under any circumstances" on Editor assistance/Requests. I do hope you change your mind on this. The job you did on Robert Wistrich was actually very good; it was only the unfortunate choice of username that gave the (apparently wrong) impression of a conflict of interest, and it would be a pity if you let that misunderstanding put you off. Do reconsider your decision, if you ever read this. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:30, 17 October 2009 (UTC)