User talk:Witchipedia

Speedy deletion of Pillers of the community
A tag has been placed on Pillers of the community requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 22:38, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

notice
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. -- The Red Pen of Doom  01:11, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Your recent edits to Debbie McGee and Paul Daniels have also been reverted for similar reasons. Contributions to Wikipedia need to be sourced, and there appears to be no information available regarding the claims you made in either of those two articles. -TonyW (talk) 02:32, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Hang on
Hi, in response to your hangon tag, the article was tagged because it might not meet criteria for a notable band. It looks like vandalism. You need reliable sources. You can attempt to fix the problem, or ask an editor for help if you want. If it's deleted, you can request a copy of the deleted version from an administrator. You might also want to see WP:Your first article. Hope this helps. Cheers.-- LAA Fan sign review 01:25, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

3RR notice
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- The Red Pen of Doom  01:35, 25 September 2008 (UTC)