User talk:Withepedia

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 01:13, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

The article James With has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. —C.Fred (talk) 01:13, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on James With requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 13:08, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 13:08, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:James With0006.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:James With0006.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:06, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of James With for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article James With, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/James With until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:46, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:James With 7.gif listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:James With 7.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:53, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

File:James With Actor.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:James With Actor.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:53, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

File:James With0002.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:James With0002.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:53, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

File:James With Wikipedia.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:James With Wikipedia.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:53, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of James With


A tag has been placed on James With, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:25, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of James Wearing Smith


A tag has been placed on James Wearing Smith requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. noq (talk) 15:50, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Please contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". The page has substantial information and relevant reference links.

April 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself, at James Wearing Smith. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. noq (talk) 15:52, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of James Wearing Smith for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Wearing Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/James Wearing Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. noq (talk) 10:24, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with James Wearing Smith. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. noq (talk) 08:40, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at A Stranger in Paradise, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''please note that policy requires to you discuss on the article talk page changes that are challenged. You are also required to WP:assume good faith and not make allegation of trolling just because you disagree with someone. '' noq (talk) 16:51, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

A Stranger in Paradise (film)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on A Stranger in Paradise. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. noq (talk) 07:24, 7 May 2019 (UTC)


 * --> noq please advise if the information is written on the official poster for the film A Stranger in Paradise, how does this violate Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to revert such amendments, how does the page ever get to improve with information? Withepedia (talk) 08:54, 7 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Try adding a reference to the content you are adding rather than assuming that people will know where it came from. I have now searched for the film poster and can see that With is credited on it. Add a reference to the poster - preferably with a resolution better than the one in wikipedia so that it can be read. noq (talk) 09:03, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * FYI, "James With" is credited twice in the official poster, once in the credits (on the 2nd line below the movie title "A Stranger in Paradise") following after actress Sonia Cooling, James With is credited as an actor, and then his name appears again (on the 3rd line) after the words "consulting producer" "James With" is written. James With is clearly both an accredited actor and accredited producer on A Stranger in Paradise. Withepedia (talk) 09:50, 7 May 2019 (UTC)


 * --> noq please consider reverting and reinstating the information that you removed in your edit of the film A Stranger in Paradise; it clearly doesn't violate Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. You can also add be so kind as to add the reference to the poster - preferably with a resolution better than the one in wikipedia so that it can be read. Withepedia (talk) 03:37, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Joe Marchal
Your addition to Joe Marchal ‎ has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. Kuru  (talk)  11:56, 7 May 2019 (UTC)


 * (talk) Thank you, however the information added did not appear to violate the terms of permission, your removal and comments have been noted, and further research shall be conducted too. Withepedia (talk) 23:45, 7 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Where's the evidence of permission? The source web page bears an all-rights-reserved license. —C.Fred (talk) 23:46, 7 May 2019 (UTC)


 * C.Fred the information was initially sourced via public records from legal documents filed in the State of Arizona. In particular, 239_notice-of-filing-second-amended-supplement-to-joint-plan_star-mtn.pdf - 11 - and that document is also referred to in the Star Mountain website, which states "You may link to our homepage, provided you do so in a way that is fair and legal, but you must not establish a link in such a way as to suggest any form of association, approval or endorsement on our part." However if this linkage is not in accordance with Wikipedia's policies, then I apologise, as it was inadvertently assumed public information that has been previously published, that is readily available, is acceptable to add to the pages on Wikipedia? Withepedia (talk) 00:31, 8 May 2019 (UTC)


 * I'm not talking about the information that you added. I'm talking about the text, and that was copied word-for-word from http://www.starmountainresources.com/board-of-directors.html, which is under an all-rights-reserved license. —C.Fred (talk) 00:36, 8 May 2019 (UTC)


 * C.Fred the text is information and wordage that is available in the public domain, after reading https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copying_text_from_other_sources. The corporate website "Terms of Use" were also read and as published, were apparently last modified and effective as of November 1, 2014. The legal documents are stamped with 21st November 2018. Again, I apologise if there was any mistake made. Withepedia (talk) 00:49, 8 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Where are they published in the public domain? Why does Star Mountain Resources hold out ownership of the text? —C.Fred (talk) 00:55, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Also, please note that the indenting standard is to move your reply in one level—in other words, add one more colon than I use. —C.Fred (talk) 00:57, 8 May 2019 (UTC)


 * C.Fred Thank you for the advice on the use of colons. The text is published in the bankruptcy court documents filed in the District of Arizona, and hence published in the public domain, and also albeit on the Star Mountain website the publishing there is in accordance with requirements for the company to make that information available to the public under SEC reguatory requirements, and therefore in this instance, I don't know whether or not Star Mountain Resources hold out ownership of the text? Please advise? Withepedia (talk) 01:05, 8 May 2019 (UTC)


 * I also found the text on another company's 8-K filing. What I'm not sure of is the legal status of an SEC filing: is it in the public domain just because it is the filing of a publicly-traded company? And worse, where did this text originate? The form I'm looking at is dated 29 May 2014. This is a messy situation that might have to go to a noticeboard for more discussion. —C.Fred (talk) 01:21, 8 May 2019 (UTC)


 * I appreciate your due diligence and further work in regards to this matter, thank you. Withepedia (talk) 01:24, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The information and text is also found at these sources: https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/person.asp?personId=28367080&privcapId=207379416 and http://www.otcmarkets.com/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=169701 (December 31, 2016). Withepedia (talk) 02:14, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Thailand Film Office banner.png
Thanks for uploading File:Thailand Film Office banner.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:30, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of James Wearing Smith


A tag has been placed on James Wearing Smith requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. noq (talk) 11:36, 15 May 2019 (UTC)