User talk:Witkacy/Archive

Powodzenia
Widzę że znowu przypuszczono szturm na twoją osobę.Powodzenia ! --Molobo 23:12, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

How to deal with Poles ;-)
Hello,

meta:How to deal with Poles was written by a Polish Wikipedian as a tongue-in-cheek answer to the attitude you try to fight. Discuss with sensible people, don't waste your time for morons and generally take it easy (Wikistress). Regards, Kpjas 09:15, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

Witam,

meta:How to deal with Poles zostało napisane przez polskiego Wikipedystę jako żartobliwa odpowiedź na postawy, które ty starasz się zwalczać. Z rozsądnymi dyskutuj, nie trać czasu na kretynów i tak w ogóle nie przejmuj się za bardzo (Wikistress). Pozdrowienia, Kpjas 09:15, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

Harcerskie Grafiki
Dziękuję serdecznei za wspaniałe harcerskie grafiki. Zaczołem je umieszczać na poslkiej wikipedii. Czy nie lepiej byłoby od razu umieszczać je na Commons ?? Założyłem tam: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Polish_Scouting i zaczołem umieszczać polskie harcerskie grafiki. Przeniesiesz i pokasujesz z angielskiej wiki grafiki przeniesione na commons? Naramiennik wędrowniczy (NIE PAGON!) to tradycyjne oznaczenie przynależności do wspólnoty wędrowniczej. Pojęcie to jest dosyć szerokie i oznacza między innymi : wędrowników, instruktorów w wieku wędrowniczym (16-25 lat), instruktorów wędrowniczych (pracujących z wędrownikami), czy też byłych wędrowników. Pojęcia te są rozwinięte w następnych pytaniach. Uwaga, naramiennika nie dostaje się automatycznie, należy go zdobyć. Sposób zdobycia naramiennika wygląda różnie w zależności od tego czy jesteśmy wędrownikiem, czy instruktorem wędrowniczym.
 * W dużym skrócie :

Szumyk 07:16, 10 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Naramiennik wędrowniczy nie jest oznaką stopnia, ani bycia instruktorem wędrowniczym!! jest tylko i wyłącznei oznaczeniem osób które ukończyły próbę wędrowniczą. Poczytaj tu:  Szumyk 15:58, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

Dobry przykład do Antypolonizmu
Myślę że z czasem można rozszerzyć artykuł o antypoloniżmie w Rosji.Służę jakby co przykładami.Na razie podaję ci niezły przykład, fragmenty antypolskiej książki z Rosji do przeczytania http://www.mediactivist.ru/action/27 Jest po rosyjsku ale wystarczy wrzucic do Babelfish http://world.altavista.com/. Miłej lektury...--Molobo 22:25, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

Page protected
I have protected this page after the plea on Wikipedia:Administrator's noticeboard#The Return. Please contact me or another administrator to unlock this page if you wish to communicate using this page. Bratsche talk 5 pillars 19:07, August 11, 2005 (UTC)

I've unprotected it - two days is likely enough. Dan100 (Talk) 21:51, August 13, 2005 (UTC)

Bf-109
Bf-109 has reported that you are "vandalising" his page on WP:AN/I.

If you suspect Bf-109 of being a sockpuppet, the proper procedure is to put up a tag, or report it to AN/I and set out your evidence. If the admins adjudge that your suspicions are correct, then the blocks will follow. Otherwise, the revert war you are engaging in is pretty useless. --khaosworks (talk• contribs) 15:51, August 13, 2005 (UTC)


 * I'm afraid I don't have the ability to check his IP, but like I said, air your concerns on WP:AN/I and someone will look into it. --khaosworks (talk• contribs) 16:52, August 13, 2005 (UTC)

3RR
You have broken the Three revert rule at Lithuania - don't do it! Seek help at WP:AN or call a Request for comments in situations like this. Edit wars get you nowhere.

You could be blocked 24 hours for this, but I am chosing to warn you instead - however, if you break the 3RR again at some point in the future, you will be blocked. Dan100 (Talk) 21:53, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
 * Just occured to me that you did seek help at the admin's noticeboard. Sorry about that! Dan100 (Talk) 22:24, August 13, 2005 (UTC)

anti-Polonism

 * By sie nie rozpisywac - mowiac o Czechach, chodzilo Ci o to jak w 1919 Czesi zajeli Zaolsie, gdy Polacy wojowali z Bolszewikami? Co do Wilna - Chodzi Ci o to jak Pilsudski przylaczyl Wilno do Polski z 1,5% zamieszkalych tam Litwinow?
 * (Not to make it too long - when you were writing about Czechs you ment that Chechs had invaded Zaolsie when Poles had been fighting with bolsheviks? As far as Wilno is concerned, you ment that Pilsudski had united Wilno with Poland when it had been inhabited by 1.5% of Lithuanians?)

Note that I added in parentheses in both cases that it is independent of whether it was right or wrong. And yes, I admit Czechs' action in 1919 was deeply unfair. And yes, I admit, Pilsudski defended in this way Polish rights in Wilno at that point of time.

Let me also point out that Polish-Lithuanian international relations between WWI and WWII were very difficult and it is atributed in many history Polish handbooks to the Pilsudski action (of course this was not the only reason).

As for the Czech, case. In 1938 Zaolsie was recaptured by Poland during a period of time in which Czechoslovakia was destroyed by Hitler which is very much comparable to the example you gave. And of course, 1919 events caused a certain deal of Polish anti-Czechism while 1938 events caused a certain deal of Czech anti-Polonism. You cannot deny that we Poles are laughing at many Czech phrases (like 'zavazadlovy kufr', 'jit dozadu' and so on). Similarly, Czechs often privately express that we Poles are less civilized and have very rude language (for instance 'szukać').

And of course all cases of anti-Polish hatred and sentiment should be condemned. Alx-pl 09:11, 15 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your links. They are very helpful. Remember however that we want to achieve NPOV which means we have to take into account other POVs in descriptions. It doesn't mean we have to be less bold in stating our POV, but we have to discuss it with others and take into account their POVs. This, in particular, means we should not alienate people we discuss with. In particular, we should discuss German anti-Polonism with Germans, Russian with Russians and so on. A text which is a result of such a discussion can really be called neutral. A text which is based solely on Polish sources and which is edited solely by Polish editors is just a Polish POV. Let's see what can be a result of such an attitude in case of Rudi Pawelka. I hope you will help to keep all the content which is important from Polish POV, but note that there must be a certain deal of content which represents the German POV. Alx-pl 19:30, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

You just put Antipolonismus into Google and you can obtain as a result an article like this which is an evidence that Germans or at least German speaking citizens of Switzerland (this requires verification) recognise that there is German anti-Polonism (I guess Philipp Ther is German). Although we must read the article carefully to add text to the article. Remember, we must also keep balance. Alx-pl 20:40, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Hello, Witkacy, after discussing on its talk page, I've been looking at the latest changes the protected article Anti-Polonism has gone through. To my great astonishment I found out that the wikipedian who kept reverting my changes without telling me why, was noone active on the talk page. It was you. So before the protection expires I'd like you to tell me where and especially why you disagree with my change, if you still disagree with it. By doing so we can discuss it and settle our differences without having problems again as soon as the article's protection is over. Thank you in advance.NightBeAsT 20:42, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Look at what was negotiated for Pawelka case. It seems that we reached something that is a description which presents his actual role. Comments are welcome. Alx-pl  D  18:14, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

Rewizjonizm idzie pełną parą
W antypoloniżmie już sie zaczęło o wstrętnych zbrodniach Aliantów przeciw Narodowi Niemieckiemu ;) ...--Molobo 01:53, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

Polish Plumber
I am just contacting you as you made an edit to this article. An anon user has edited every instance of the word advertisement to the word propaganda. I can't revert further without breaking the rules. Could you please examine this article? --TimPope 21:47, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your help, I am glad you found an image of the "nurse" as I couldn't find one when I was looking :) --TimPope 16:30, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

Zerknij
Na talk antipolonizm.Wśrod potoku obelg na Polskę Alx uczynnie podpowiada Niemcom jak udowodnić że jesteśmy obłąkani iż mówimy o tym jak Rudi Pawelka oskarża Polske o wywołanie wojny(co dość śmieszy skoro nawet GW o tym pisała).--Molobo 23:24, 23 August 2005 (UTC) Oh już się pojawiło że GW to szmatławiec skoro podało że Pawelka oskarża Polskę o IIWŚ.
 * D

--Molobo 22:32, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

Faustyna Kowalska
I spoke too soon about Faustyna Kowalska being cleaned up. I noticed your edit of the picture cutline just now, so I wanted to let you know that I did a considerable cleanup, but after your edit. Take a look at Faustyna Kowalska now. While I think it is a fairly miserable page, I hope it reads and looks better now. Pozdrawiam Cie, -- Mareklug 01:05, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

List of Polish Films
Will you please put up a notice regarding the creation & population of List of Polish language films on WP:PWNB? Dzeki... Benzamin 18:05, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

Translation of Deutschlandlied
Hi. I tried to initiate some conversation on the talk page of Das Lied der Deutschen in order to resolve the ugly revert was you are engaged in. I would be grateful if you commented on the discussion page instead of perpetuating this behaviour. Best, Arbor 06:16, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

Gdańsk
Wydaje mi się, że można by powalczyć o nazwę Gdańsk dla okresu 1466 do 1793. Skupiłbym się nad tym, czy to głosowanie Talk:Gdansk/Vote przed jego wdrożeniem zdobyło konsensus zgodnie z Survey guidelines. W szczególności opis dla okresu 1466 do 1793 jest zupełnie nieadekwatny do rzeczywistości historycznej tamtych czasów. Alx-pl  D  13:32, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

Myślę, że takie rozwiązanie, choć miłe mojemu sercu, byłoby bardzo trudne do przeprowadzenia. Trzebaby znaleźć dobre argumenty, że tak jest sensownie. Przykładem dobrego argumentu byłoby, że w przypadku jakiegoś innego ważnego miejsca historycznego stosuje się właśnie zasadę nazywania (w kontekstach historycznych) zgodnie ze współczesnym stanem rzeczy. Gdyby się znalazło kilka takich przypadków, to nasze stanowisko byłoby trudne do obalenia, ale obawiam się, że takie przypadki trudno będzie wynaleźć, a ja się za słabo znam na historii/geografii, żebym mógł w tym aktywnie uczestniczyć. (Choć przychodzą mi do głowy jakieś przykłady, które można byłoby próbować zbadać: Turku/Åbo, Oslo/Christiania, Nice/Nizza.) Może natomiast są tutaj jacyś bosowie, którzy by to umieli znaleźć? Alx-pl  D  14:06, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

Kiepsko, że Cię zablokowali. Jeszcze jeden przykład do zbadania Strasbourg/Straßburg. Gdzie jest ta dyskusja o ponowieniu głosowania o Gdańsku? Alx-pl  D  12:09, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

Abuse of Admin rights by Chris 73
I have blocked you for 24 hours for disrupting Wikipedia. You have repeatedly removed double naming from articles against community consensus. The last instance was Georg Forster. As per Talk:Gdansk/Vote, there was a more than 2/3rd majority for double naming, both for Gdansk and for the cities with a shared history in general. There was also a more than 2/3rd majority for biographies of German people to have the order German/Polish (and vice versa for Polish people). You are very well aware of this vote, and even you yourself said that a 2/3rd majority is good enough for consensus. I also have warned you again on your talk page (which you kindly removed ) Hence I block you for disrupting Wikipedia for repeatedly and over the span of multiple months going against community consensus. I fully expect you to bitch on any noticeboard and talk page you can get a hold of, feel free to do so. On an unrelated side note, please do not revert my talk page. Also, you can still edit your talk page. -- Chris 73 Talk 14:17, September 3, 2005 (UTC)


 * Thats abuse of Admin rights. First of all you should know that "users should not block those with whom they are currently engaged in conflict". I have not committed any violation of the Wikipedia policy. --Witkacy 14:40, 3 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Blocking policy: Disruption
 * Sysops may, at their judgement, block IP addresses or usernames that disrupt the normal functioning of Wikipedia. Such disruption is to be objectively defined by specific policies, and may include changing other users' signed comments or making deliberately misleading edits.


 * You have changed names of Polish cities to German ones, and i reverted you. So tell me please, according to what policy did you blocked me?--Witkacy 14:56, 3 September 2005 (UTC)


 * As far as Chris73's actions are concerned, he left the article cited above (Georg Forster) with both the Polish and German forms of the name (Diff). Witkacy, from what I can see, was insisting on removal of the German form, leaving the Polish version only (Diff 1, Diff 2).  The block seems legitimate under the Gdansk decision.  To avoid any appearance of impropriety, I have removed Chris73's block, and placed my own for the remaining 23 hours. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 15:31, 3 September 2005 (UTC)


 * The block seems legitimate under the Gdansk decision.
 * Under which rule of the Wikipedia policy?--Witkacy 19:59, 3 September 2005 (UTC)


 * unblocked and reblocked Witkacy for 23 hours as a (hopefully) neutral third party to the dispute
 * neutral third party? I dont believe you are neutral, Chris 73 asked you - per email? - for help, that's all. However, Im still waiting for the answer, which rule I violated.--Witkacy 20:15, 3 September 2005 (UTC)


 * I'm afraid you are mistaken. Chris 73 never emailed me, and as far as I know, I've never had any contact with him prior to my renewal of his block.  Further, I have never been involved in the apparently contentious disputes surrounding the use of Polish versus German city names.  I posted a note about the block at Account suspensions immediately after I placed it because I felt that its potentially controversial nature might warrant further review.
 * Blocking policy allows administrators broad discretion to block editors whose behavior–in the admin's judgement–is disruptive to Wikipedia's smooth functioning. By removing entirely reference to the German names of the cities in question, you took an action which a reasonable editor (and veteran of the Gdansk/Danzig debates, especially) should understand would be inflammatory.  I personally am not bothered over whether the German or the Polish name should come first in Georg Forster's article, though it would seem that cooler heads have been able to reach some sort of compromise on the talk page. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 04:20, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

W imieniu Rzeczypospolitej: Space Cadet 22:24, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

asking for support
Hello, since you are interested in Lithuania I thought that you might support our letter to Centre for Cartography, Vilnius University. We are asking to release their maps found at www.balticdata.info under GFDL licence so they could be used in articles about Lithuania. So far we got 14 people to "sign" it. The draft in very very rough English is available at user:Renata3/letter. If you decide to support it, I'll need just your first and last names together with your user name. You can leave it on my talk page or send it via email: just attact @gmail.com to my user name. Renata3 22:37, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

Abuse of Admin rights by Chris 73 (again)
Hi Witkacy. Double naming has been supported by more than 2/3rd of the votes, which is enough even by your standards. Since you still insist on going against community consensus, I block you again for disrupting Wikipedia. You may complain about this, but for the next 48 hours these complaints are limited to your talk page -- Chris 73 Talk 14:53, September 6, 2005 (UTC) Do zobaczenia za 48 godzin.Postaramy sie jako tako przyuważyć niemieckich wandali.--Molobo 16:12, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Since you started right away again with going against consensus after your block expired, I have blocked again. -- Chris 73 Talk 09:59, September 9, 2005 (UTC)


 * "users should not block those with whom they are currently engaged in conflict". Is it possible to stop this biased administrator? --Witkacy 10:04, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

German nationalistic POV pushing and stalking by Chris --Witkacy 10:18, 9 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Witkacy, Chris 73 is 'stalking' you because you're repetitively engaging in the same disruptive behaviour. The pattern of edits in your contributions list is pretty distinctive.  You are welcome to use Wikipedia's dispute resolution methods to try to come to some peacable compromise.  It is not acceptable to carry on with the same edits–removal of German forms of city names from articles where both Polish and German names appear–and to expect admins to ignore you while you do something that (if ignored) would restart a lot of unproductive and outright destructive edit wars.
 * After your block ends, I would encourage you to follow the example of User:Lysy. He has kept a cool head, and achieved what seem to be reasonable compromises on a number of pages that have experienced naming conflicts. It is possible to discuss these matters calmly and rationally, without edit warring and without impugning the motives or character of your fellow editors.  TenOfAllTrades(talk) 13:13, 9 September 2005 (UTC)


 * "Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit.."
 * I will repeat myself, but according to the rules on Wikipedia, edits like that dont disrupt wikipedia - the name of the city is Gdańsk (and German POV pushers like Chris and his little fellow Nighbeast should live with that) Its a compromise to use the German name from 1795 until 1945, but pushing the German name for time periods when the city was part of Poland is unacceptable.
 * You can justify his abuse of admin rights, but i have not broke any official wiki-rule.
 * Thanks for you comment, Chris again asked you for help... --Witkacy 14:14, 9 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Actually, that's the first time that Chris 73 contacted me, presumably because I had involved myself in your first block. You will note that that comment was in relation to your second block on this issue, not the current (third) one.  In all cases, I posted my comments regarding the blocks on the appropriate high-visibility pages (the administrator's noticeboard and the account suspensions log) where they could be readily reviewed by other Wikipedians (and in particular, other admins who might choose to undo the block if I or Chris 73 had grievously erred.)
 * I strongly encourage you to stop edit warring and engage in discussion. There is a reasonable argument to be made, and there are reasonable people out there to hear it.  Calling people names, removing German city names without comment, and shouting admin abuse don't help to resolve the issue.  Quite frankly, I don't think it is possible to immediately solve this problem, and I would counsel patience.  TenOfAllTrades(talk) 15:18, 9 September 2005 (UTC)


 * strongly encourage you to stop edit warring
 * stop to reverting POV?.. (bad idea..)
 * and engage in discussion
 * Discussion about what? The name of the city is Gdańsk. United Nations map of Poland, official website of Gdańsk ...
 * "shouting admin abuse don't help to resolve the issue"
 * Admins who abuse their powers should be banned. I wonder that until now such rule was not created. My blocks are a nasty example how admins abuse their powers for POV pushing.
 * Fiat iustitia, ruat coelum ! :)--Witkacy 16:22, 9 September 2005 (UTC)


 * (P.S. User:Nightbeast vandalised and violated the 3RR on my talk page - needs to be blocked)--Witkacy 16:22, 9 September 2005 (UTC)


 * If you're talking about the edits like this one, it looks like he was removing remarks that he thought were a personal attack. I can see how Nightbeast might have found those comments insulting.  Further, characterizing the edits as 'vandalism' is factually incorrect and might itself constitute a personal attack.  (There is a formal description of what constitutes vandalism at Vandalism.)  While Nightbeast has not been a paragon of good faith and calm discussion in this dispute, it is not helpful to bait him.


 * As for 'reverting POV', substituting your preferred point of view for someone else's doesn't resolve anything; it simply perpetuates an edit war. Use the talk pages and RFC to discuss NPOV.  Engaging in drive-by reversion without discussion just makes it easier for people to dismiss your opinion. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 16:50, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Nightbeast ? He deleted Bismarck speech on Bismarck policies calling it a POV :D

--Molobo 15:33, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

Abuse of Admin rights by Chris 73 (nr 4 or 5?)
Since you started right away again with going against consensus after your block expired, I have blocked you again. -- Chris 73 Talk 15:07, September 12, 2005 (UTC)


 * Once again Chris 73 ignored the Blocking Rules for pushing German POV. Biased admins like you are a shame for Wikipedia Witkacy


 * And again stalking edits [ [[User:Witkacy|Witkacy]]

Boze Igrzysko
Witkacy, I understand your annoyance with calling the city Danzig during the centuries when it was part of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Unfortunately, that appears to be the norm in English language historiography. Even Norman Davies, one of the most renowned writers on Polish history generally considered very sympathetic to Poland, uses the German name Danzig during this period in his magisterial work God's Playground: A History of Poland. So, please, please stop removing the German name. Balcer 18:48, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

"God's Playground" is not an encyclopedia! Britannica calls the city Gdansk throughout the ages, even Free City of Gdansk. Space Cadet 20:57, 12 September 2005 (UTC)


 * "God's Playground" is widely acknowledged to be the best history of Poland available in the English language. It is "better" than Encyclopedia Britannica! The fact that it uses Danzig suggests that name should at minimum be mentioned in Wikipedia articles dealing with that period. Witkacy's attempts to eradicate any mention of it at all are unjustified, to say the least. Balcer 21:36, 12 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Like I said... Wiki is an encyclopedia, not a story book like "God's Playground". It's not a history book either. Space Cadet 21:48, 12 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Balcer, jakie nazwy uzywa Davies w Bozym Igrzysku, niema znaczenia. To nie jest nawet problem historyczny - w jezyku angielskim to miasto nazywa sie Gdansk. I tak na marginesie, nie dyskutujemy tutaj na temat nazwy miasta tylko administratora ktory nie trzyma sie regul wikipedii Witkacy

Spokojnie.Widzę że niemieckim nacjonalistom i germanofilom puszczają nerwy skoro uciekają się do de facto cenzury by zgermanizować polskie miasta i rejony na wiki.Ale spokojnie, można to cierpliwie i wytrwale powstrzymywać.Chrisa należy gdzieś ewidentnie zgłosić bo blokuje aby przeforsować swój punkt widzenia. --Molobo 15:33, 13 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Kampania wrzesniowa, pierwszy raz zblokowal mnie trzeciego - prawie trafi na czas ;) --Witkacy 17:36, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

Chris nie stosuje się do tego co nam poleca przestrzegać.On daje niemieckie nazwy a w rezultach(sfałszowanego) głosowania podano że trzeba podawać ANGIELSKIE nazwy.Tak więc powinno być Torun zamiast Toruń, Gdynia zaś jest używana w angielskim, podobnie jak Warmia. Tymczasem Chris uparcie próbuje wcisnąć niemieckie nazwy. Dla przykładu: Gdynia Poland-1,690,000 na Google. Gdingen Poland-14,7000 na Google.

Podobnie jest z Toruniem, Warmią itd. --Molobo 09:22, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

Królewiec
Mam kłopoty na stronie Kaliningrad. A na stronie dyskusyjnej jakieś młoty odsądzają mnie od czci i wiary. Proszę o szybką pomoc. Dzięki! Kosmonauta


 * Chetnie pomoge, obecnie siedze za sprawa klausa w pawiaku, jutro mam chwilowa przepustke wiec zerkne.--Witkacy 21:00, 13 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Pomylka, klaus zbanowal mnie na caly tydzien--Witkacy 13:34, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

Przydałby się banner "Nur für Deutsche und Polizei in Uniformen" na wikipedi dla niektórych artykułów, żeby było wiadomo kto może edytować  ;) --Molobo 01:54, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

Antypolonizm odblokowany
Radzę zerknąc na stronę. --Molobo 09:22, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

Daniel Pipes
There are some editors causing controversy at Daniel Pipes. Do you or any other Polish editors care about this? Daniel Pipes is Jewish, but a few editors want to make him seem only "Polish". I have no idea why. DannyZz 01:09, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

Images
Hi, you uploaded Image:General Brygady P.gif and Image:General Brygady test.png, I'm guessing you drew them, but they lack source information- could you please add the copyright details to the image pages asap. Thanks. --nixie 07:11, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

Image:Krzyzyk ZHP.jpg
What is this image's origin? Is it from a photograph you took? ¦ Reisio 18:06, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Lilijka zhr z napisem.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Lilijka zhr z napisem.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. cohesion ★ talk 02:25, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Wawel XVIw.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Wawel XVIw.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —  THOR  =/\= 04:08, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Fixed. --Irpen 06:28, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

AfD
Hello Witkacy, I wanted to let you know that I nominated Elżbieta Marianna Wielopolska for deletion (Articles for deletion/Elżbieta Marianna Wielopolska), on grounds that she is not notable. If you disagree, I would appreciate your comments. (Also, I really like your painting on your main page.) --F a ng Aili 19:38, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Image:Lwow pod zaglami 2.jpg
I've labeled this image as pd-old, but I don't understand polish, so I wasn't able to fully understand what was written on the pl page. could you double check that I've tagged it correctly? Thanks. Matt 04:39, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * ditto with Image:Lwow_w_Rio_de_Janeiro_600.jpg
 * both fixed. --Irpen 02:37, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Policja2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Policja2.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --OrphanBot 08:47, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Wegorzewo Mapa.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Wegorzewo Mapa.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 01:51, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Fixed. --Irpen 06:25, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:StanislawOstrowski.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:StanislawOstrowski.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact Carnildo or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you.
 * Fixed. --Irpen 06:25, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Jezioro goplo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jezioro goplo.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Longhair 00:50, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Fixed. --Irpen 06:25, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Marek Edelman.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Marek Edelman.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Longhair 13:32, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Fixed. --Irpen 06:25, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Pagon-starszy bosman.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Pagon-starszy bosman.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Longhair 09:15, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Fixed. --Irpen 06:25, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Pagon komandorpodporucznik m.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Pagon komandorpodporucznik m.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Longhair 09:41, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Fixed. --Irpen 06:26, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Stanislaw_Broniewski.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Stanislaw_Broniewski.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you. -- Carnildo 06:00, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Fixed. --Irpen 06:25, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Admiral-Floty P.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Admiral-Floty P.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 03:29, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Fixed. --Irpen 02:28, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Obrazy Witkacego
Obrazy Witkacego NIE SĄ JESZCZE własnością publiczną: autor umarł w 1939, dopiero w 2009 będzie można swobodnie kopiować i używać jego prace. A.J. 15:27, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Please check your WP:NA entry
Greetings, editor! Your name appears on List of non-admins with high edit counts. If you have not done so lately, please take a look at that page and check your listing to be sure that following the particulars are correct: Thank you, and have a wiki wiki day! BD2412 T 02:08, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) If you are an admin, please remove your name from the list.
 * 2) If you are currently interested in being considered for adminship, please be sure your name is in bold; if you are opposed to being considered for adminship, please cross out your name (but do not delete it, as it will automatically be re-added in the next page update).
 * 3) Please check to see if you are in the right category for classification by number of edits.

Image copyright problem with Image:Marynarka.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Marynarka.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. BRossow 18:10, 17 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Same for the order images, like Image:Oak island large6.jpg. Thanks, JYolkowski // talk 20:06, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Order_Orla_Bialego2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Order_Orla_Bialego2.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as db-unksource.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 10:23, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Order_Orla_Bialego3jpg.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Order_Orla_Bialego3jpg.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as db-unksource.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 03:44, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Adam_Karol_Czartoryski.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Adam_Karol_Czartoryski.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as db-unksource.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 04:03, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

WP:POLMIL
Hi there! You might want to know that the good ol' WikiProject Polish Army has been restarted, this time as WP:POLMIL, a part of the WikiProject Military history. As the main tasks of the previous WikiProject have been fulfilled (both Polish-Bolshevik and Polish Defensive wars are now featured), we might want to start yet another quest for some holy grail. Any ideas? Halibutt 14:46, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ignacy Daszynski.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ignacy Daszynski.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 18:15, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Fixed. --Irpen 21:55, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Chrzanowski order orla bialego.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Chrzanowski order orla bialego.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 18:45, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Fixed. --Irpen 21:56, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:Rycina 1752 Palac Branickich.jpg
hello Witkacy, thank you for uploading the image, it has however no source information. Could you please provide it? thank you... Gryffindor 03:57, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Brazowy_Krzyz_Zaslugi_z_Mieczami_zdjecie.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Brazowy_Krzyz_Zaslugi_z_Mieczami_zdjecie.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 07:18, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * fixed. --Irpen 02:54, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Bronislaw_Duch.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bronislaw_Duch.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 09:42, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * fixed. --Irpen 02:54, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Dar_Mlodziezy_z_masztu.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dar_Mlodziezy_z_masztu.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 12:05, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Found LQ image, but can't find the exact source.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 07:12, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Adam_Asnyk.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Adam_Asnyk.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 14:22, 13 March 2006 (UTC) :Fixed.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 07:12, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Herb Glemp.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Herb Glemp.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 11:23, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Fixed (fair use).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 07:12, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Adam_Daniel_Rotfeld.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Adam_Daniel_Rotfeld.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 14:35, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Fixed (PolandGov).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 07:12, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Adam_Ludwik_Czartoryski.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Adam_Ludwik_Czartoryski.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 01:28, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Found LQ image, but can't find the exact source.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 07:12, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Gielda_siedziba.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Gielda_siedziba.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 01:39, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Adam_Ludwik_Czartoryski1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Adam_Ludwik_Czartoryski1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 11:44, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Edmund Taczanowski
Hiya, could you please tell me where you got the Edmund Taczanowski image from? I'm one of his relatives, and would be very interested. Thanks! --Elonka 15:11, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ossolineum.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ossolineum.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 11:52, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Fixed.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 17:23, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Krzysztof_Mikolaj_Radziwill.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Krzysztof_Mikolaj_Radziwill.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 10:14, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Skarzysko_kosciol_nsj.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Skarzysko_kosciol_nsj.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 15:47, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Fixed (GFDL, Commons).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 20:54, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Polonia_Restituta.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Polonia_Restituta.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 09:47, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Restored fair use, still needs a source.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 20:53, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Michal_Grazynski.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Michal_Grazynski.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 11:44, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Fixed - source found.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 17:58, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

one contributor
Czesc, Witkacy! Just wanted to point this out: Wikipedia contributor Kuban coSSack's talking about dictatorial ruler Lukashenka (who massively and monstrously falsified the vote) and today's storming of the October square, when hundreds of special police arrested peaceful demonstrators, totally destoryed the camp, threw empty vodka bottles into the mess and videotaped that for Belarusan state television. Here's Kuban coSSack's comment about this police action and break-up of a peaceful protest, which took place at 3AM so that there would be no witnesses of their activity:


 * http://www.br23.net/en/2006/03/24/game-over/#comments
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rydel#.22kuban_coSSack.22

Dear fellow Wikipedians, do you understand that the only purpose of his contributions on articles about Belarus (such as Belarusian language, Belarusian history, Belarus, etc.) is to push Russian imperial POV and lies? Please, see history and talk pages of the Belarus-related articles. --rydel 16:37, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Robert_Korzeniowski.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Robert_Korzeniowski.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 06:59, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Fixed (PolandGov).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 17:41, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:KrzyzOswiecimski-rew.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:KrzyzOswiecimski-rew.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Image legality questions. 09:21, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Fixed (added tags from pl wiki).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 13:41, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Rycina 1752 Palac Branickich.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rycina 1752 Palac Branickich.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Gryffindor 20:46, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Saints Wikiproject
I noted that you have been contributing to articles about saints. I invite you to join the WikiProject Saints. You can sign up on the page and add the following userbox to your user page.

I also invite you to join the discussion on prayers and infoboxes here: Prayers_are_NPOV.

Thanks! --evrik 17:39, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Status
Have you see this box?

--evrik (talk) 19:51, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Your template is listed for deletion
Yes, it's true. Try not to add them :). Wanna know why? :) We already have succesion boxes available. :) Happy Wiki-ing, friend!-- 陈 鼎  翔    贡献  Chat with Tdxiang on IRC! 09:47, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Teodor Potocki.jpg
I saw that your insert the picture of Teodor Potocki in the english wiki. I´m from Ermland(warmia) and born in Allenstein(Olsztyn) and interested in information about this region. So my question did you have this picture in a higer resolution avaliable - if you have please send it to me (korczak.artur [at] gmx.de), I´m also avaliable in the german wiki under Akorczak.

Thanks Artur


 * Please read the notice at the top of the page. I'll repost it to the bottom too.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Orlik_Team.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Orlik_Team.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:04, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Sejm sala obrad.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sejm sala obrad.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 04:06, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:KrzyzHR.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:KrzyzHR.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 20:51, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Order_Stanislawa2.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Order_Stanislawa2.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 22:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Apolonia Ustrzycka.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Apolonia Ustrzycka.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 16:11, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Untagged image
An image you uploaded, Image:OrzelekPrzemysla.jpg, was tagged with the coatofarms copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as seal. If you have any questions, ask them at Media copyright questions. -- 16:48, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:OrelekZygmuntaS.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:OrelekZygmuntaS.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:47, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Parasolka n.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Parasolka n.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 02:15, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Zamek_krolewski_na_Wawelu.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Zamek_krolewski_na_Wawelu.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MER-C 05:12, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Zawisza_Czarny_II.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Zawisza_Czarny_II.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MER-C 05:13, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Zhp_z.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Zhp_z.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MER-C 05:16, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Zelazowawola.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Zelazowawola.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MER-C 05:17, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Zhp_b_srebro.gif
Thank you for uploading Image:Zhp_b_srebro.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MER-C 05:18, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Zhp_b_zloto.gif
Thank you for uploading Image:Zhp_b_zloto.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MER-C 05:19, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Zhp_s.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Zhp_s.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MER-C 05:20, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Zamek_Krolewski_na_Wawelu_noca.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Zamek_Krolewski_na_Wawelu_noca.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:46, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Centralwings.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Centralwings.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 16:38, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Centralwings.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Centralwings.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:38, 16 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 16:38, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Era.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Era.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 20:24, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Era.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Era.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:24, 17 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 20:24, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Centralwings.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Centralwings.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:28, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:LogoWSO.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:LogoWSO.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 17:02, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Chopin Pragnienie Milosci plakat.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Chopin Pragnienie Milosci plakat.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:18, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Era.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Era.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:17, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:KPK logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:KPK logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:31, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:KrzyzHR.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:KrzyzHR.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:KrzyzHO.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:KrzyzHO.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Krzyz Wywiadowca Mlodzik.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Krzyz Wywiadowca Mlodzik.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Krzyz Odkrywca.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Krzyz Odkrywca.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Krzyz Cwik.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Krzyz Cwik.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Iskry Logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Iskry Logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:27, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Instytut Rozbitek logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Instytut Rozbitek logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Samarytanka i cwik zhp.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Samarytanka i cwik zhp.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:33, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Harcerka orla i harcerz orli zhp.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Harcerka orla i harcerz orli zhp.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:59, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Harcerka Rzeczypospolitej i harcerz Rzeczypospolitej zhp.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Harcerka Rzeczypospolitej i harcerz Rzeczypospolitej zhp.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:59, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:LilijkaZHP.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:LilijkaZHP.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Seksmisja.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Seksmisja.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Przystanek.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Przystanek.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ogniem i Mieczem plakat.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ogniem i Mieczem plakat.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Pan Wolodyjowski plakat.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pan Wolodyjowski plakat.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:PKOBankPolski.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:PKOBankPolski.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:12, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ossolineum.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Ossolineum.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Slawomir Petelicki.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Slawomir Petelicki.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Potop plakat.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Potop plakat.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Poland first to fight lotnicy.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Poland first to fight lotnicy.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Polacy Berlin1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Polacy Berlin1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Pogon Lwow.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Pogon Lwow.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Plusgsm.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Plusgsm.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:37, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Plakat Pilnik Country 2003.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Plakat Pilnik Country 2003.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:49, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Pionierka i odkrywca zhp.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Pionierka i odkrywca zhp.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Gielda.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Gielda.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:17, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Zemsta_plakat.jpg
I have tagged Image:Zemsta_plakat.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 17:50, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Aleksander_Wielopolski.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Aleksander_Wielopolski.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:52, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Logo tdp.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Logo tdp.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:18, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Zoska odzn bt.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Zoska odzn bt.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:12, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Tropicielka i wywiadowca zhp.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Tropicielka i wywiadowca zhp.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:26, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ziemia Obiecana plakat.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ziemia Obiecana plakat.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:27, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Uniwerek Sklodowskiej.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Uniwerek Sklodowskiej.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:37, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Wiedzmin plakat.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Wiedzmin plakat.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:50, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Harcerka orla i harcerz orli zhp.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Harcerka orla i harcerz orli zhp.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:35, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Template:Archbishop of Lviv
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Template:Archbishop of Lviv, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Template:Archbishop of Lviv fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: '''This template is no longer in use and may be deleted. Please remove, thank you!''' To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Template:Archbishop of Lviv, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:39, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Template:Archbishop of Lwów
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Template:Archbishop of Lwów, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Template:Archbishop of Lwów fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: '''This template is no longer in use and may be deleted. Please remove, thank you!''' To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Template:Archbishop of Lwów, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:41, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Template:Archbishop of Warsaw
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Template:Archbishop of Warsaw, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Template:Archbishop of Warsaw fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: '''This template is no longer in use and may be deleted. Please remove, thank you!''' To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Template:Archbishop of Warsaw, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:54, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Template:Archbishop of Poznań
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Template:Archbishop of Poznań, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Template:Archbishop of Poznań fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: '''This template is no longer in use and may be deleted. Please remove, thank you!''' To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Template:Archbishop of Poznań, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:56, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Jan_Kaczmarek.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jan_Kaczmarek.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 11:03, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Palac3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Palac3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:40, 23 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 22:40, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Aerogryf.gif
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Aerogryf.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:29, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 12:29, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Admiral-Floty_P.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Admiral-Floty_P.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:09, 6 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  05:09, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Marynarka.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Marynarka.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:11, 8 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  19:11, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Wice-Admiral_P.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Wice-Admiral_P.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:08, 11 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  18:08, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Kwas Havel.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Kwas Havel.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:41, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Roman Krzyzelewski.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Roman Krzyzelewski.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 22:23, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Orlik Team.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Orlik Team.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Orzel Marszalka.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Orzel Marszalka.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:ORP_Sokol_1.jpg
I have tagged Image:ORP_Sokol_1.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 13:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pogon Lwow.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Pogon Lwow.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:ZHP
Template:ZHP has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 01:21, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wiedzmin plakat.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Wiedzmin plakat.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Chopin Pragnienie Milosci plakat.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Chopin Pragnienie Milosci plakat.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Accession of Poland to the European Union
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Accession of Poland to the European Union, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.poland.gov.pl/Poland%E2%80%99s,way,to,UE,458.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Accession of Poland to the European Union and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Accession of Poland to the European Union with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Accession of Poland to the European Union.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Accession of Poland to the European Union/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Accession of Poland to the European Union saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Vermi (talk) 23:55, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Anna_Zawadzka.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Anna_Zawadzka.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 16:05, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Pagon_admiral_m.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Pagon_admiral_m.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly hi! 20:26, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Wojska_ladowe.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Wojska_ladowe.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly hi! 21:07, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Adam_Ludwik_Czartoryski.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Adam_Ludwik_Czartoryski.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 03:08, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Aleksander_Jan_Jablonowski.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Aleksander_Jan_Jablonowski.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:25, 22 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly hi! 02:25, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Andrzej_Artur_Zamoyski.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Andrzej_Artur_Zamoyski.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:56, 22 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly hi! 06:56, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Antoni_Jan_Ostrowski.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Antoni_Jan_Ostrowski.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:09, 22 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly hi! 13:09, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Antoni_Potocki_(1780-1850).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Antoni_Potocki_(1780-1850).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:09, 22 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly hi! 13:09, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Anna_Zawadzka.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Anna_Zawadzka.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly hi! 06:34, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Polish scouting ranks
Template:Polish scouting ranks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. —— Gadget850 (Ed)  talk  -  16:18, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Pomnik Mickiewicza.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Pomnik Mickiewicza.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. BJ Talk 12:29, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Samarytanka i cwik zhp.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Samarytanka i cwik zhp.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:08, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cwik.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Cwik.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:24, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Aleksander_Kaminski.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Aleksander_Kaminski.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:20, 14 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 13:20, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Antoni_Potocki_(1780-1850).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Antoni_Potocki_(1780-1850).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:21, 21 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 11:21, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Zemsta plakat.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Zemsta plakat.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:15, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Eurolot logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Eurolot logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:15, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ossolineum.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ossolineum.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:08, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Polonia Restituta.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Polonia Restituta.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:09, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Michal Grazynski.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Michal Grazynski.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:10, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:KrzyzOswiecimski-rew.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:KrzyzOswiecimski-rew.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:17, 6 October 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:17, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zofia Zamoyska
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Zofia Zamoyska, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. M0RD00R (talk) 11:25, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Róża Potocka
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Róża Potocka, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. M0RD00R (talk) 11:28, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:ORP Sokol 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:ORP Sokol 1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:ORP Sokol 1.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:ORP Sokol 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:44, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Zofia Potocka.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Zofia Potocka.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:29, 30 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:29, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Bartek.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bartek.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:32, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Politechnika swietokrzyska logo.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Politechnika swietokrzyska logo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:36, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

File:75PL.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:75PL.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. OsamaKReply? on my talk page, please 14:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:Srebrny Medal Sily Zbrojne w Sluzbie Ojczyzny.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Srebrny Medal Sily Zbrojne w Sluzbie Ojczyzny.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 21:04, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Dyplom Sklodowska.jpg
File:Dyplom Sklodowska.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Dyplom Sklodowska-Curie.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:44, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * File:A-wezel.png is now available as Commons:File:A-wezel.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 03:36, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Eustachy Erazm Sanguszko1.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Eustachy Erazm Sanguszko1.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 17:43, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Poland
WikiProject Poland has awarded you a status of a honorary member (you have never officially joined the project by signing on its front page...). Thank you for your Poland-related encyclopedic contributions! Please consider officially joining the project by moving yourself from the "Honorary members" list to the "Active members" list here.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 18:48, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Brazowy Medal Sily Zbrojne w Sluzbie Ojczyzny.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Brazowy Medal Sily Zbrojne w Sluzbie Ojczyzny.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:27, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Franciszek Smuglewicz.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Franciszek Smuglewicz.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:22, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Krzyz Oswiecimski awers.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Krzyz Oswiecimski awers.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:22, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Wladyslaw Kozakiewicz.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Wladyslaw Kozakiewicz.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:11, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Czarni Lwow.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Czarni Lwow.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:22, 14 May 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 (talk) 07:22, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Wawel XVIw.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Wawel XVIw.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:37, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Walesa Kwas.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Walesa Kwas.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Collegium Nobilium 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Collegium Nobilium 1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:27, 12 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 (talk) 21:27, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:SBSK.gif
Thanks for uploading File:SBSK.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:28, 30 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 (talk) 23:28, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Commons:File:Rycina 1752 Palac Branickich.jpg
This file was moved to Commons from English Wikipedia, but some description information may have got lost in the process.

As you are noted as the original uploader, or in the history for the file, it would be appreciated if you could help in reconstructing this information.

Thanks for you assistance and keep uploading 'free' media :)

In particular this needs an expanded source. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:59, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:JanKarcz 23569.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JanKarcz 23569.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:07, 11 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Masur (talk) 09:07, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Walesa Kwas.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Walesa Kwas.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --M0RD00R (talk) 16:15, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Witkacy! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 11 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:


 * 1) Marian Sowiński -
 * 2) Zdzisław Żurawski -
 * 3) Tadeusz Sapierzyński -
 * 4) Czesław Ryll-Nardzewski -
 * 5) Stanisław Targosz -
 * 6) Roman Krzyżelewski -
 * 7) Jerzy Owsiak -
 * 8) Władysław Ogrodziński -
 * 9) Włodzimierz Kryszewski -
 * 10) Wiesław Chrzanowski -

11. Ryszard Pacławski

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Seksmisja.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Seksmisja.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 13:26, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Warszawa Pomnik Wyszynskiego.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Warszawa Pomnik Wyszynskiego.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 15:07, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Roman Sanguszko.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Roman Sanguszko.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:59, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:59, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Natalia Potocka.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Natalia Potocka.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:00, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:00, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Teodor Potocki.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Teodor Potocki.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:04, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:04, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Jan Krasinski (1756-1790).jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Jan Krasinski (1756-1790).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:04, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:04, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Przemyslaw Potocki.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Przemyslaw Potocki.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:05, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:05, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Elzbieta Marianna Wielopolska.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Elzbieta Marianna Wielopolska.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:07, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:07, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Józef Aleksander Jablonowski.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Józef Aleksander Jablonowski.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:07, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:07, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Kazimierz Nestor Sapieha (1754-1798) 1.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Kazimierz Nestor Sapieha (1754-1798) 1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:09, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:09, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Jozef Maksymilian Ossolinski.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Jozef Maksymilian Ossolinski.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:10, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:10, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Jozef Maksymilian Ossolinski 1.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Jozef Maksymilian Ossolinski 1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:11, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:11, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Karol Kniaziewicz.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Karol Kniaziewicz.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:11, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:11, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Stanislaw Konarski.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Stanislaw Konarski.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Jozef Antoni Poniatowski 3.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Jozef Antoni Poniatowski 3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:13, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:13, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Zbigniew Olesnicki.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Zbigniew Olesnicki.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:28, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:28, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Artur Stanislaw Potocki.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Artur Stanislaw Potocki.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:31, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:31, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Jerzy Radziwill (1556-1600).jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Jerzy Radziwill (1556-1600).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:32, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:32, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Jadwiga Maria Potocka.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Jadwiga Maria Potocka.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:32, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:32, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Jan Nepomucen Potocki (1867-1943).jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Jan Nepomucen Potocki (1867-1943).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:33, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:33, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Roza Maria Wodzicka.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Roza Maria Wodzicka.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:36, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:36, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Stanislaw Antoni Potocki (1837-1884).jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Stanislaw Antoni Potocki (1837-1884).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:16, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:16, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Jerzy Konstanty Czartoryski.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Jerzy Konstanty Czartoryski.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:18, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:18, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Izabella Elzbieta Czartoryska.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Izabella Elzbieta Czartoryska.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:21, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:21, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Wladyslaw Hieronim Sanguszko.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Wladyslaw Hieronim Sanguszko.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:22, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:22, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Kazimierz Porebski.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Kazimierz Porebski.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:25, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:25, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Zawisza Czarny I.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Zawisza Czarny I.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:42, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:42, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Jan Franciszek Czartoryski.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Jan Franciszek Czartoryski.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:14, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:14, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Orzelek wojska.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Orzelek wojska.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:12, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:12, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:OAMalkowscy.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:OAMalkowscy.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:36, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:36, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Ignacy Daszynski.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Ignacy Daszynski.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:48, 3 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:48, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Jozef Grzesiak.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Jozef Grzesiak.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:07, 4 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:07, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Wladyslaw Krasinski.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Wladyslaw Krasinski.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:23, 5 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:23, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Zwirko i Wigura medal.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Zwirko i Wigura medal.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:25, 5 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:25, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Pagon-marynarz.png
Thank you for uploading File:Pagon-marynarz.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:52, 5 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:52, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Wegorzewo Herb.png
Thank you for uploading File:Wegorzewo Herb.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:53, 5 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:53, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:A-wyjazd.png
Thank you for uploading File:A-wyjazd.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:01, 5 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:01, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Zygmunt Pulawski.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Zygmunt Pulawski.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:56, 19 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:56, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Stanislaw Broniewski.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Stanislaw Broniewski.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:58, 19 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:58, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Jozef Grzesiak.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Jozef Grzesiak.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:07, 19 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:07, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Polska Flaga Berlin.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Polska Flaga Berlin.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 16:47, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Wprost.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Wprost.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:08, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Józef Grzesiak (resistance fighter) for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Józef Grzesiak (resistance fighter), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Józef Grzesiak (resistance fighter) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 02:19, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:SBSK3.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:SBSK3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:45, 27 October 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:45, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Silver Cross of Merit (Polish Scouting and Guiding Association).jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Silver Cross of Merit (Polish Scouting and Guiding Association).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  Ja Ga  talk 22:19, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gold Cross of Merit (Polish Scouting and Guiding Association).jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Gold Cross of Merit (Polish Scouting and Guiding Association).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  Ja Ga  talk 18:52, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wikiportal:Poland/Selected anniversaries
Template:Wikiportal:Poland/Selected anniversaries has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 00:50, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Orzel Wojsko.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Orzel Wojsko.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:58, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Juliusz Malkowski.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Juliusz Malkowski.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:15, 10 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:15, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:OrelekZygmuntaS.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:OrelekZygmuntaS.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:14, 10 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. JDavid (talk) 10:14, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Orzel Wojsko.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Orzel Wojsko.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:36, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:OrelekZygmuntaS.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:OrelekZygmuntaS.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JDavid (talk) 12:09, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Monitor. WikiProject Poland Newsletter: Issue 1 (April 2011)
Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 21:23, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Polish Scouting Association.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Polish Scouting Association.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:16, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Herb mazowieckie.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Herb mazowieckie.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 09:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Orzelek19 27.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Orzelek19 27.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 09:08, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Medal Za Ofiarnosc i Odwage.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Medal Za Ofiarnosc i Odwage.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 09:10, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Zloty Medal Sily Zbrojne w Sluzbie Ojczyzny.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Zloty Medal Sily Zbrojne w Sluzbie Ojczyzny.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 09:10, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Srebrny Medal za Zaslugi dla Obronnosci Kraju.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Srebrny Medal za Zaslugi dla Obronnosci Kraju.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 09:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Zloty Medal za Zaslugi dla Obronnosci Kraju.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Zloty Medal za Zaslugi dla Obronnosci Kraju.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 09:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Oficer Marynarka.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Oficer Marynarka.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 09:26, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Wanda Gertz.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Wanda Gertz.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:37, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Wladyslaw Gnys.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Wladyslaw Gnys.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:38, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Zwirko RWD-6.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Zwirko RWD-6.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:40, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Medal Sampere auso.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Medal Sampere auso.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:20, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Stanislaw Jan Jablonowski pomnik.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Stanislaw Jan Jablonowski pomnik.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:21, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Marek Edelman.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Marek Edelman.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Na Berlin.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Na Berlin.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:23, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Lotnictwo Polskie na froncie wschodnim.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Lotnictwo Polskie na froncie wschodnim.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:23, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Teofilia Ludwika Zasławska for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Teofilia Ludwika Zasławska is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Teofilia Ludwika Zasławska until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wkharrisjr (talk) 15:44, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Na Berlin.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Na Berlin.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:24, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Lotnictwo Polskie na froncie wschodnim.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lotnictwo Polskie na froncie wschodnim.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:24, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Florian Marciniak.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Florian Marciniak.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:31, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Antoni Potocki (1780-1850).jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Antoni Potocki (1780-1850).jpg

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 00:48, 13 April 2013 (UTC)