User talk:Wixifixer

Robert Kagan as neoconservative
Hello Wixifixer, rather than being involved in an edit war, I would be glad to discuss the subject further on the subject's talk page. Owen (talk) 16:46, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note that you have reverted the article three times already, which under policy calls for a block. However, because you may not be aware of this policy, I will give you another chance to desist now. Please do not revert again. Owen (talk) 16:56, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Dear Owen, I see that you have decided to settle this without talking, even though I have attempted to discuss with you. So you are basically bullying at this point. Sincerely, Wikifixer.
 * On the contrary, I have responded. That you continued to engage in a revert war at the same time you brought forward your case is disingenuous at best. And I did warn you about Wikipedia's policy regarding reversions. Owen (talk) 17:33, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Well, now you have conveniently made it impossible for me to respond to you. However, you have made your own prejudices in this matter perfectly clear, by emphasizing that "neo-conservative" views are "unpopular" or "aberrant." I wonder where you can back up THAT judgment. You appear to be on a crusade. Sincerely, Wikifixer.
 * On the contrary, I think anyone who takes a gander at your editing history will see that you are the one on "a crusade". For three and a half years your edits have been almost totally restricted to enforcing your point of view on that one Wikipedia page. Owen (talk) 17:41, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

If I thought you were interested in a compromise, I would attempt to work one out, as I have in the past. However, I think it will be necessary to appeal to some arbitrator on this matter.
 * Clearly I am interested in a compromise. For instance, I think it's a good idea to reference that Kagan doesn't accept the label for himself. However, I think it is necessary to point out that he is regularly considered a neoconservative, and to ensure that his contribution to PNAC is mentioned in the header of the article. We could ask for a third party to help resolve the dispute, but generally the policy is that considerable discussion should take place between the two parties in disagreement before asking for this assistance. Owen (talk) 18:06, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Some impulses need to be stifled: Look what happened to the liberation of the 1960s! ;)
Hi Wixifixer!

You really should relax and count to 200 before slamming other editors, even slamming their edits. The instinct to crush your opponents probably makes you a devastating debater and convincing writer, but it can be counter-productive here.

If you need help, please use the noticeboards I suggested. There are a lot of nice editors who will help you.

Take it a bit easier. Kiefer .Wolfowitz 16:26, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

P.S. Are you implying that the Colbert Report is not a reliable source? ;p

Sorry, KW, I just noticed your message. I understand your point. I just get frustrated having to fight these battles over and over again. Every time I think things are settled, someone pops up and starts it all over. I missed your reference to the noticeboards. Where is it? all best, Wixifixer.

Sockpuppet investigation
You are being discussed at a sock puppet investigation. Consistent with the scholarship to which you have been subjected on Wikipedia, this SPI confuses you with another account!

I don't believe that we have anything but the usual relations.

is a 20:31, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Village pump (idea lab), (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment, or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button OOUI_JS_signature_icon_LTR.svg located above the edit window.

Thank you. Tol &#124; Talk &#124; Contribs (formerly Twassman) 20:18, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia's "conflict of interest" guidelines
Hello, Wixifixer. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. JBW (talk) 21:45, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

A few edits
I edited a certain biography of a certain living person a few days ago, but failed to check the talk page. I just did so now, and saw your remarks of March 2021. I had been in the process of putting them in place without even being aware that you stopped by. I had an additional question, as explained on the talk page here. If you have a chance, please provide me with some guidance, as you are more of an expert in that area than I am.

Thank you.--FeralOink (talk) 12:34, 26 June 2022 (UTC)