User talk:Wizardman/Archive30

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 03:42, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

New baseball article :P
Here's Paul Krichell, may you do the GA review, or copyedit for me. Thanks Secret account 17:41, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Btw I fixed your concern on Featured article candidates/Ben Paschal/archive1. Thanks Secret account 18:27, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Glaciergate
Glaciergate just got recreated. You killed it before. Do we have to go through RFD again? William M. Connolley (talk) 00:05, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

David Pearson (NASCAR driver) GA review
Thank you for spending the time on the GA review! I read an article in the recent Signpost about the lack of reviewers. I reviewed a different nominee right after I nominated this one, like I've always done. FYI I waited about 2 months for this article to be reviewed. I completely agree with your assessment, the issues that you have raised prevent it from becoming a Featured Article and I had no thoughts on even trying. I will, of course, continue to watch for reliable sources and I'm sure I will eventually add this information.  Royal broil  18:00, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 13:55, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Breaker boy
I just noticed that you are participating in Wikicup so there is great time urgency to get to the next stage. To me, the article is close enough. What concerns me is you only have one edit in 2010, not really enough to qualify for a Wikicup entry unless one tries to qualify on a technicality.

Consider the following: Last section - too short? More info available? Or merge it to another section? Any source to say that there was this job only in the U.S. even though coal is mined worldwide? Consider renaming the importance section something else (I know I suggested the word importance before) Function or tasks of breaker boys? The yellow picture is the most important so consider putting it at the top. The other pictures are less clear, just a group of people. Just make a few good faith changes and you'll qualify for Wikicup and GA at the same time. If I forget remind me in 2-3 days and the GA will be yours. Good article! Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 19:26, 8 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I purposely didn't edit the article so you could and then claim credit for Wikicup! If I knew that it wasn't a Wikicup submission, I wouldn't have participated in so much theatre; just give the GA!  Will award it tomorrow, have to sign off now. Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 19:23, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations! GA approved. Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 18:42, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Add a "public interest" clause to Oversight
A proposal to add a "public interest" clause to Oversight has started at Wikipedia_talk:Oversight.  SilkTork  *YES! 10:17, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Walter Alva
Hello! Your submission of Walter Alva at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Materialscientist (talk) 07:51, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Trevor Pinnock GA Review
Hi would you consider leaving the hold open for longer than 5 days. I would be prepared to put in some work to keep this article at GA but this is certainly not my highest priority task on Wikipedia and I don't want to be rushed. The main author of the article hasn't edited Wikipedia at all since I posted my heads up message about it being on the sweep list. I have noticed someone else edit the article today and have posted to their page to see whether they are interested in working with me to keep it GA.--Peter cohen (talk) 23:38, 12 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your patience. I now think the article is ready for inspection.--Peter cohen (talk) 14:19, 19 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I've now fixed that last point.--Peter cohen (talk) 23:07, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Improving film articles
Thanks for contacting me, hopefully this will be helpful. For reviews of older films, usually we need to rely on book sources or newspapers (sometimes can be found in the archived Google News), or maybe a university database can look for old publications of reviews. If you'd like to include modern reviews of older films, then you can get reviews from Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic (although it's best to split up the reviews for the old and new since the time difference is a major factor in the interpretation/acceptance of a film). For instructions on improving film articles, WP:FILMS' style guidelines are very helpful. I would also recommend taking a look at the many GA/FAs in our Spotlight department. Many of these are great examples (especially the newer ones) of the many elements film articles include as well as ideas on where to find additional sources (also take a look at the Resources department for more assistance with sourcing). If you have any questions on improving an article you're working on, feel free to ask any of the project's members in taking a look or dropping a message at WT:FILM. If you need any further clarification, please let me know. It's good to see you take on film articles, and we'll be more than happy to help you out, especially if it means further GA/FAs! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:32, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Re:Talk:Butterfly Fly Away/GA1
My second wave of comments have not been addressed. J Milburn (talk) 21:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

AFD comment
Can you please be clear on what you mean by the Glenn Murray (1930–40s outfielder) article is written as if he had been a major leaguer. I am attempting to bring it up to standards and save it from deletion, so input will help. Thanks. --Brian Halvorsen (talk) 02:44, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I have attempted to make it less "misleading." I only named the parent clubs because that is the way it is normally done. I mentioned nothing of playing for the parent team. --Brian Halvorsen (talk) 03:07, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Again, only affiliated parent clubs were used, the organization he was in, not random teams. The content mentioned it was the "orgainzation," not the team itself. I hope you don't think it was my intention to mislead anyone. --Brian Halvorsen (talk) 03:14, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 13:00, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

New userbox!
Hi there GameFAQer, I made this userbox!

You can add it to your userpage by simply adding this --Lorson (talk) 19:16, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the GA review on Asia League Ice Hockey! I appreciate your taking the time.--Crossmr (talk) 00:08, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

GAC
I have made edits per your review of the Come What(ever) May article.  REZTER  TALK   &oslash;  12:44, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Mail
You've got some ;). Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 17:51, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Jerry Grote & the Colt 45s
I brought up a debate concerning Jerry Grote and the Colt 45s at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball. I'd like your input on the topic.--Johnny Spasm (talk) 00:25, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Dire Straits tineline
Please, return me a template code on User:AndreyA/Dire Straits timeline--Andrey! 18:47, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * --Andrey! 07:26, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

From Wikiproject Baseball Talkpage, Red Sox All Time Roster
If nothing else, I made a first draft of a sortable table with the info in there. Took me about an hour on Microsoft Excel. Still a few glitches, but otherwise, tell me what you think. Doc Quintana (talk) 20:17, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 February newsletter
Round one is over, and round two has begun! Congratulations to the 64 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our first round. A special well done goes to, our round one winner (1010 points), and to and , who were second and third respectively (640 points/605 points). Sasata was awarded the most points for both good articles (300 points) and featured articles (600 points), and TonyTheTiger was awarded the most for featured topics (225 points), while Hunter Kahn claimed the most for good topics (70). claimed the most featured lists (240 points) and featured pictures (35 points), claimed the most for Did you know? entries (490 points),  claimed the most for featured sounds (70 points) and  claimed the most for In the news entries (40 points). No one claimed a featured portal or valued picture.

Credits awarded after the end of round one but before round two may be claimed in round two, but remember the rule that content must have been worked on in some significant way during 2010 by you for you to claim points. The groups for round two will be placed up shortly, and the submissions' pages will be blanked. This round will continue until 28 April, when the top two users from each group, as well as 16 wildcards, will progress to round three. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup; thank you to all doing this last round, and particularly to those helping at WikiCup/Reviews. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, by email or on IRC. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) at 00:57, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

GA Sweeps Completed!
Thanks to everyone's amazing efforts in February, we have reviewed all of the articles and are now finished with Sweeps! There are still about 30 articles currently on hold, and once those reviews are completed, I will send you a final message about Sweeps process stats including the total number of articles that were passed and failed. If you have one of these open reviews, be sure to update your count when the review is completed so I can compile the stats. You can except to receive your award for reviewing within the next week or two. Although the majority of the editors did not start Sweeps at the beginning in August 2007 (myself included), over 50 editors have all come together to complete a monumental task and improve many articles in the process. I commend you for sticking with this often challenging task and strengthening the integrity of the GA WikiProject as well as the GAs themselves. I invite you to take a break from reviewing (don't want you to burn out!) and then consider returning/starting to review GANs and/or contribute to GAR reviews. With your assistance, we can help bring the backlog down to a manageable level and help inspire more editors to improve articles to higher classes and consider reviewing themselves. Again, thank you for putting up with difficult reviews, unhappy editors, numerous spam messages from me, and taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 02:40, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Meckiff
Persondata added  YellowMonkey  ( vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll )  07:44, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanx a lot
Hey Wizardman.

Thanks a lot for pointing out many of the issues concerned with the article 2003 Afro-Asian Games. Your suggestions have opened my eyes a little more. I'll try to rectify these issues as soon as possible.

Cheers!

Ankitbhatt (talk) 07:02, 28 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I have rectified many of the issues regarding the article 2003 Afro-Asian Games. I request you to have a second look at the article and tell me what you think.


 * Appreciate your efforts.


 * Cheers,


 * Ankitbhatt (talk) 09:26, 1 March 2010 (UTC)


 * If you noticed, you said that I have to create sub-sections for each sport. Today is March 2, and I have till March 4 to complete all the suggestions so as to be able to obtain GA status for the article right? I feel 2 days is rather insufficient for the task. Is it so necessary for GA status? If it is, then i request you to put the review on hold for a few more days so that I can complete the work. The reference part will be completed very soon.


 * Anyways, cheers.


 * Ankitbhatt (talk) 06:36, 2 March 2010 (UTC)


 * There is just that last thing to do, namely to create separate sub-articles for each sport. That will take some time. But other than that, all the issues concerning the article have been rectified. If you have any new suggestions or problems, please do not hesitate to tell me.


 * Ankitbhatt (talk) 16:14, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jerry Babb
An article that you have been involved in editing, Jerry Babb, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. PackerMania (talk) 03:23, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Stan Benjamin
I was in the hospital for two weeks following a episode. I didn't see any other major concerns. Also I fixed the Ben Paschal comment. Thanks Secret account 12:58, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Paul Krichell awaits :p Secret account 16:45, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Btw I'm willing to help you out in Operation Big Bear. Secret account 17:22, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

I sent you a question
and I'm waiting on a reply on it. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 09:56, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Replied. Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 14:01, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * you have new message. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 19:07, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Reply sent. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 21:33, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Derick Neikirk GA review
Thank you for reviewing this article. It's been a really busy week at work, but next week will be slow and leave me with a lot of free time at home. Could you please give me until Tuesday to address your concerns in this review? Thanks, GaryColemanFan (talk) 23:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Ben Paschal/archive2
As the GA reviewer and commenter in the first FAC, you may want to comment on this one. Thanks Secret account 13:28, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Kamal Haasan/GA1
I was perusing GAN and saw you were requesting a second opinion on this review. I've given my opinion on the images on the review page. Hope that helps. Best, HJ Mitchell  |  Penny for your thoughts?   00:29, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Chad Knaus
You have a new message Wizardman on this talk page.  Nascar 1996  02:05, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Woohoo!
FA! =D After taking a brief look at the Main Page process, it looks like it is too early to make a request for that? -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:08, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I know very little about the process (seems a bit confusing to me), but isn't the pending request for the 10th, not the 9th? -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:48, 6 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Never mind, I see what you mean. I told you I was a little confused. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:50, 6 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Yup. If you need a hand with anything, just give me a nudge. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:56, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Strange edit
I'm not sure what is going on with this edit. It looks like you're changing the Baseball project tag to use the standardize name (which shouldn't be done "alone" with AWB because it's an insignificant edit), but the edit also removed information from the ChicagoWikiProject tag? –xenotalk 15:31, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I think my reasoning for removing was because since it was a future event, the assessment would likely change quite quickly. I won't worry about it now though, when i look through the 2010 season articles in october i'll change it if needed then. Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 01:27, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * So assess it when it improves =) At the time it was a stub. Anyways, if it was an isolated thing and manually initiated (as opposed to a rogue find/replace setting), no need to worry. –xenotalk 22:02, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Re: Talk:Philip the Arab and Christianity/GA1
I'm probably not the best choice for closing that - I was mostly doing a prose/technical review, and I really couldn't tell one way or the other whether the content was complete and accurate, as I have no outside knowledge of the subject. Sorry about that. Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 17:49, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Tai Streets
I think you are watching, but I have responded to your issues.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:13, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 03:57, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Bill Spivey GAN
Thanks for taking the time to offer the review and fixes. Your efforts are much appreciated, by myself and many others.  Giants2008  ( 27 and counting ) 04:03, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

John Mitchell (football coach) Good Article review
I've expanded the article significantly and rearranged the structure a bit. I believe that I've addressed all of your suggestions. Please take another look and let me know.

Also, another user suggested that the name of the article really should be changed to John Mitchell (American football coach) to fit WP's naming conventions. I agree that this is a more appropriate name, but I don't want to change it while it's being reviewed. If the article is passed as a GA, is it okay to then move the article?&mdash; DeeJayK (talk) 19:19, 5 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I've implemented your most recent suggestions for this article. Please have another look.&mdash; DeeJayK (talk) 20:06, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Leonard Bloomfield
The Leonard Bloomfield article is decidedly incomplete, I have worked up the "easy" parts but haven't written up the main components of his linguistic work, his major textbook Language, the impact of his work, etc. I have not been active with this article for some time and it's unlikely I will get back to it any time soon, unfortunately. If you want to put it up for GA that's perfectly fine of course, but I won't be able to participate in the review. Thanks. Jomeara421 (talk) 23:19, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Philip the Arab and Christianity GAR
Hey, Wizardman. I've brought Philip the Arab and Christianity to GAR. The page is here. G.W. (Talk) 16:08, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback: Talk:Derick Neikirk
—  Spike Toronto  23:42, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Yorkshire Captaincy Crisis
Hi. I've made some changes to the article. I've tried to explain the amateur thing in the article, but not sure whether it works and whether it fits in. If not, I'll take it out again! Thanks. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:50, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Ping...
...if you can... Frank  |  talk  17:23, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Just for note (not wiki-related)
Found out last night: Hell's Kitchen Season 7 starts June 7, 2010. Here's a bonus, its two hours every Thursday :) Mitch 32(We the people in order to form a more perfect union.) 22:22, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Napoleon and Tabitha D'umo
I listed this article on the GA nominations page in January and Mephiston999 had volunteered to review it. He left comments on March 2 and I've addressed all of them. The problem is I'm still waiting to be promoted. It's been more than seven days. I left a message on his/her talk page but I've recieved no response. Nothing is wrong with the article (well, as far as I can tell). How can I get it promoted to GA. Do I really have to renominate it? // Gbern3 (talk) 02:59, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:44, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Pit Bull/GA2
Left a comment there. At this point I'd just fail it. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:55, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I've reluctantly done so. The nominator has been offline since the day I began the review. Firsfron of Ronchester  23:28, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Image placeholders
I noticed you left a final warning on User talk:70.109.67.134 for what I assume to be adding the image placeholder to articles. I have been undoing their edits in the same vein since you left that warning but I now feel like I am entering edit warring territory as the IP is revisiting the same articles with the same edits. Should I continue reverting? Should I post to AN/I? For your reference 70.109.67.134 started editing after stopped contributing. Thanks  Tide  rolls  10:18, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:25, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Gossip (The Office) GAN: On hold
Hello, I hope you are doing well. I have reviewed the article, and have found a few issues that should be addressed before the article is passed. The review can be seen here. I will leave the article on hold for seven days, and an extension can be given if progress is being made. Good work on the article so far, and let me know on my talk page if you have any questions or when you are finished. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:41, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:48, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Did You Know review
I left a comment at Template talk:Did you know. Thanks. --Brian Halvorsen (talk) 07:31, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

A sincere thank you from Wikiproject Good Articles
On behalf of Wikiproject Good Articles, I would like to express our gratitude to you for your contributions to the Sweeps process, for which you completed 53 reviews. Completion of this monstrous task has proven to be a significant accomplishment not only for our project, but for Wikipedia. As a token of our sincere appreciation, please accept this ribbon. Lara 01:17, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:28, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 March newsletter
We're half way through round two, and everything is running smoothly. leads overall with 650 points this round, and heads pool B. currently leads pool C, dubbed the "Group of Death", which has a only a single contestant yet to score this round (the fewest of any group), as well five contestants over 100 points (the most). With a month still to go, as well as 16 wildcard places, everything is still to play for. Anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Although unrelated to the WikiCup, April sees a Good Article Nominations backlog elimination drive, formulated as a friendly competition with small awards, as the Cup is. Several WikiCup contestants and judges have already signed up, but regular reviewers and those who hope to do more reviewing are more than welcome to join at the drive page. If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) 22:25, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

WP Baseball in the Signpost
WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Baseball for a Signpost article to be published April 5. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Also, if you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, feel free to share this with them. -Mabeenot (talk) 00:58, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

GA responds: Ivar Hippe
I've replied to one of your comments... Question, do you have access to any newspaper archives over in the US? --TIAYN (talk) 08:34, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Manchester United F.C.
This is currently a good article nominee. At the risk of sounding impatient, would you mind reviewing it if you get a chance? Regards, Tom. Tomlock01 (talk) 19:36, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Afonso, Prince Imperial of Brazil
Thank you for your time taking a look at the article. I really appreciate it. However, I'm a little busy right now. How much time do I have to fix the article? Could I have around 24h to do that? Kind regards, --Lecen (talk) 20:20, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
-- &#47; MWOAP &#124; Notify Me &#92; 00:55, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

The Fray
Since Esprit15d bailed, I took over on the GAN. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 01:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Fair use images
Wizardman, I asked you a question in a comment on your message here and will be grateful for a reply there. Regards, Cinosaur (talk) 04:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Prince Afonso
Thank you very much for your help in the article about Prince Afonso! Could you tell me what do you think the article needs to be raised to featured grade? Kind regards, --Lecen (talk) 13:47, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Nick Adenhart
Can you check my April 3rd additions to the article? I'm not sure I like them, especially that last sentence. Thanks. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:34, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Honório Carneiro Leão, Marquis of Paraná
Hi, I didn't realise that he had stopped editing. I will take over as a new review. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 12:22, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination
Hi Wizardman, I have a query re: your DYK nomination of Don Black (baseball) here. Might be me being blind, but I can't see the source for the hook in question. Cheers, -- Beloved Freak  17:33, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that. -- Beloved Freak  22:58, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Ecology
Hi, I noticed that User:Sasata has reinstated the review on the GAN page, I noticed because I was reading over the article and was about to pick up the review. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 21:53, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 03:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments welcome
As a sportsman, you might have an opinion on the debate at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_College_Basketball.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:16, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Vandal on the loose
FYI. User:Chumblespuz is on the loose as a vandal. I have sent hime two warnings today and another user sent hime one last month. Chris (talk) 20:23, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Chris (talk) 22:47, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Userfy
Hey Wizardman, could you please userfy Walter Mendenhall to my userspace? Thanks,  Eagles   24/7  (C)  22:15, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  22:19, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

April 9 TFA
Didn't make the cut. Bummer. But still, good to have a FA. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:44, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Clarence Ransom Edwards
I noticed that you have been reviewing Clarence Ransom Edwards for a couple days. Have you found anything yet? --Kumioko (talk) 19:18, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem thanks. --Kumioko (talk) 19:57, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I think I fixed everything. I couldn't answer a couple of the questions so I removed it for know. Let me know if you see anything else that needs to be fixed. --Kumioko (talk) 02:20, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Sister City (Parks and Recreation)
Thanks for looking at Sister City (Parks and Recreation). I fixed that dead link. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  01:00, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Removing my review notice?
What's this all about? Is there a day limit of some sort? I was planning on reviewing the article this weekend (I only have time to review articles on weekends).  The left orium  13:30, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright, fair enough. Guess I'll have to choose some other article then. :)  The left orium  15:31, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your interest in this article, which has now become a resource for wikipedia.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:14, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied
Not sure if you notioced  YellowMonkey  ( vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll )  02:40, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Question
Hi W. There is an article that I would like to move through FA by May 6 if at all possible, as it promises to be very much in the news at that point in time. Its not a sports one -- but would you consider taking on its review? MaterialScientist suggested I contact a good reviewer if I knew one, and you are the best IMHO. Tx.--Epeefleche (talk) 08:07, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks much. Actually, my thought was just to go to FA.  Its the Aafia Siddiqui article.  She had oodles of hits when she was convicted.  She will be sentenced May 6.  In Pakistan, especially, this case has been front page news, so there may well be news/events upon her sentencing that make this front page stuff which we can anticipate.  Would you have interest in doing the FA review?  Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 17:09, 10 April 2010 (UTC)