User talk:Wizardnam

March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to SWAPO, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Pgallert (talk) 15:34, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Reliable source being the swapo head of PR in Windhoek Namibia.
 * No, Wizardnam, that's exactly the sort of source that Wikipedia considers unreliable. Things that only you can know are what we call "original research". If you follow the link above you can read our policy about it. --Pgallert (talk) 07:17, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi Wizardnam, I will now re-instate your claim; today's New Era supplement backs it clearly. Sincere apologies for assuming the fact was false. --Pgallert (talk) 09:13, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Namrights


A tag has been placed on Namrights requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. &mdash; RHaworth 11:31, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Namrights


The article Namrights has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no evidence that it meets the notability criteria for organisations

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash; RHaworth 00:13, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Phil Ya Nangoloh


The article Phil Ya Nangoloh has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. The-Pope (talk) 13:27, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Namrights


A tag has been placed on Namrights requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pgallert (talk) 13:50, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Update: Namrights and Phil ya Nangoloh
Hi Wizardnam, both articles should be safe now. Please remember to always provide a reliable, independent source when adding content to Wikipedia, and do not copy from web sites with unclear copyright status or outright copyright reservations. --Pgallert (talk) 14:33, 9 September 2011 (UTC)