User talk:Wizzair

There's an expression...
"Quality, not quantity"; i think you would find a warmer reception at Wikipedia were you to do less edits and do the remaining more thoroughly. You can continue to remove daily warnings, but keep in mind that removing these does not inhibit your path towards being blocked. Thanks. Quaeler (talk) 23:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of See Air Jamaica Destinations
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article See Air Jamaica Destinations, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Duplicate of "Air Jamaica Destinations"

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Austin512  ( talk  &bull;  contribs  00:56, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Pseudo-sockpuppet - South African Airlines
I'm not 100% convinced yet, but it looks like you are acting as the editor South African Airlines also. Please note that this type of behaviour (where you've been warned a dozen times and then move to another account) is frowned upon. Quaeler (talk) 01:37, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)