User talk:WizzardCat

Help me
A contributor Zeitgeist1977 continues to add libelous information about Ted Levine and his family in the form of a section called "Legal Issues"https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ted_Levine&oldid=718388589 where he reports full names of family members. This contributor sites sources with misguiding information reported by unreliable sources to back up his addition to the Wikipedia page. This section doesn't report the truth and could lead to harm or threats to family members involved. I have edited this information a couple of times and finally deleted it because the "Legal Issues" are not relevant to the article and go against the policies of the biographies of living person policy.

I am requesting that the section "Legal Issues" be deleted permanently and that Zeitgeist1977 is blocked from editing the "Ted Levine" Wikipedia entry. Please respond to this claim as it bares great personal safety implications.

Thank you
 * Both sources look perfectly acceptable, and thus I see no reason to remove the paragraph. Apparently I was wrong.
 * By the way, your user talk page is not the correct place to put this request (or similar ones in the future). Please do so at Talk:Ted Levine, where it will be seen by a broader audience. As an additional note, please make sure you sign all of your posts by placing ~ at the end, which will automatically add your name and the date. Primefac (talk) 16:13, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Please reconsider your assessment of those sources, . Radar Online is a gossip site and is not reliable for contentious material in a BLP. The second source is a local newspaper which never once mentions Ted Levine. It must be excluded. This family dispute is an utter triviality unworthy of inclusion in this biography. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  17:19, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Fair enough . My main concern was that WizzardCat would not get the assistance they required because they were posting on their talk page. I quickly checked the references and added my first line (now stricken) after closing the request. Primefac (talk) 17:30, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you both. I'm not a regular user of wikipedia nor do I plan to be and don't know much about code. As a working mother of two, it takes a bit of time on breaks to be able to figure this out. I was personally implicated in the article and know that the way it was written was false. Not being a regular user of Wikipedia I don't know the correct procedure, I needed help. If information like that is left up there, wikipedia would be an unreliable source implicating non public figures and another way for cyber-bullying. Thanks again. I don't understand how to sign posts. maybe like this WizzardCat (talk) 19:36, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * You did fine, . If this stuff creeps back into the article, please let me know by clicking "Let's discuss it" in my signature to go to my talk page. Take care. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  20:05, 3 May 2016 (UTC)