User talk:Wizzito/2021 Archive

Your submission at Articles for creation: Circle of Hope Girls Ranch has been accepted
 Circle of Hope Girls Ranch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Circle_of_Hope_Girls_Ranch help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! ƒirefly ( t · c ) 06:40, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Hoax article on sqwiki
Regarding your message, thank you for noting that. I contacted an admin who will very soon delete the hoax article. Cheers, Ktrimi991 (talk) 14:36, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

You're welcome Wizzito (talk) 23:12, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

IP editor vandalism
Thank you for noticing my reverts of vandalism; I appreciate the note! I'll keep an eye on those articles to make sure thhe vandal doesn't strike again; if he does, maybe it's time for a temporary block on that IP? (or on both IPs, now that there's an IPv6 editor doing it too?) I'm not familiar with the guidelines for blocking IPs. - Brian Kendig (talk) 21:52, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

You're welcome, perhaps I will get another administrator to help. Wizzito (talk) 21:54, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:17, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

3RR on Esme & Roy
Hey, just wanted to make you aware that you breached WP:3RR on the Esme & Roy article. This appears to be your first time doing so and you haven't been warned about this policy previously. There are exemptions for 3RR but I don't think fixing MOS violations meets any of them, and I wouldn't say that these reverted edits rise to the level of vandalism. In the future I'd suggest bringing the matter to the edit warring noticeboard and not reverting further by yourself. Other users and administrators can evaluate the situation and revert, block, or protect as necessary without needing you to risk violating policy yourself. Cheers, --Chris (talk) 21:55, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for telling me. Just was confused about the whole situation in general as the editor kept reverting without an edit summary. I'll try to get another opinion next time. wizzito &#124; say hello!  21:57, 18 June 2021 (UTC)


 * No problem. And I do agree that the edit should have been reverted.  I'd just hate to see a productive editor like yourself getting blocked because of a policy matter.  Keep up the good work!  --Chris (talk) 21:58, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

"Troubled teens"
Seen this BBC article? Yngvadottir (talk) 00:55, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Saw that yesterday. wizzito &#124; say hello!  18:08, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Can you please help me?
Hi, I recently published an article about the actor Kristofer Kamiyasu, but it was deleted due to lack of credible references and links. I copy pasted the article I wrote before deletion and added the required references and links to credible articles outside of Wikipedia. However, It was almost immediately deleted, speedy deletion beacuse it seemed "to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristofer Kamiyasu." the person performing the deletion can not have read the updated material. What do I do now? I'm quite new to this and just wanted to publish a page about an actor I admire. Can you help me?

Sanna Bergman (talk) 15:11, 20 June 2021 (UTC) Sanna

Hi, sorry for getting back to you so late, I haven't been feeling too well. Did you add new references or did you use the same references from the old article? If it was the same article with the same references used, it was indeed a re-addition of information that was previously deleted at Articles for Deletion, and therefore eligible to be speedy deleted. wizzito &#124; say hello!  21:29, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Also, if Kristofer is not yet eligible for a Wikipedia article, but you would still like to have the information somewhere on Wikipedia, you can write it as a draft so you can keep working on it until it does meet notability. You can also submit it through Articles for Creation, but it may be declined due to failing notability (but it will not be deleted unless it hasn't been edited for more than 6 months) wizzito &#124; say hello!  21:34, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for you reply, I did in fact add new references, and deleted the old, but it was speed deleted anyways. Is there any chance to undo the deletion? Take care- Sanna Sanna Bergman (talk) 10:48, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Moving articles to Draft space
Hello, Wizzito,

This is just a reminder that whenever you move an article from main space to draft space, you must post a notice to the talk page of the page creator informing them of what you've done. Most editors who do work with AFC use a script that "Draftifies" the article and posts this notice for you. I don't know the script off-hand but if you ask at WT:AFC, I'm sure someone could refer you to the page where you can get this installed. It makes things very easy. If you don't want to use the script, you should post these notices on your own so the page creator is informed of your action. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:38, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

My apologies, I guess Twinkle doesn't notify the page creator when a move is done. Can you direct me to the script? wizzito &#124; say hello!  01:41, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Wizzito, the script I use is this one. It automatically notifies the creator of the page that you've "draftified" it, and deals with a lot of other stuff too (disabling categories and so on). You can customise the default message sent to the user, and the edit summary for the move. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:58, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

3D Spongebob Sound Variations
Hello Wizzito,

You revert doing wrong, this is everywhere in Youtube now, for example: when search Henry Stickmin + certain choices, the autocomplete will show list under, one of autocomplete recommends is Sound Variatons. The popular video genre Sound Variations recently become search easily when search type certain meme or popular games, such Among Us or Mario with the sound effect, you will find lot of Sound Variation videos. I don't understand why 3D Spongebob are become the popular subject of Sound Variations that the source usually taken up for. I looking 3D Spongebob Sound Variations pretty much, when I search 3D Spongebob or Spongebob 3D, any combinations with 3D Spongebob, most search results are Sound Variation videos. However when search Kamp Koral or search Kamp Koral with common words, it's hardly to find, but when type certain dialogue to search, it will can find too.

3D Spongebob, especially of Kamp Koral, many of dialogue or sounds are countless, inexhaustible source that Sound Variations channel taken to make Sound Variation videos. Going to Youtube, search "3D Spongebob" you will find out how the video type incredible rampant is. Weather Top Wizard (talk) 12:12, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi ! Just because something is well-known doesn't exactly mean that it is notable enough as a mention in an article or an article itself. When adding something to an article, it needs that have sources that are reliable. So, if you can find a reliable source that talks about these variations as being notable enough, it can be added to an article. But remember that something having a lot of views on YouTube does not necessarily mean that it is notable enough for Wikipedia. Here is a good guide on citing sources to get you started. wizzito &#124; say hello!  14:43, 12 July 2021 (UTC)


 * By the way, YouTube is not considered a reliable source. wizzito &#124; say hello!  14:54, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Know Your Meme has a dedicate article about Sound Variations, however it's not the reliable source conform the quality to fit in Wikipedia.

Pocoyo is also popular subject of Sound Variations channel videos in Youtube, one of the channel STUNE, created a series of Sound Variation videos crossover with Masha from Masha and the Bear, although all video are removed due violate Youtube community guidelines, the video types are thriving to other Sound Variations channel to make their crossovers. I don't know why Pocoyo become so popular to Sound Variations, but I can relatable those thing is, video games (Especially Mario series and Cut the Rope) and shows or Youtube channels whose primitively towards children (especially Spongebob and Pocoyo) are usually are countless source of Sound Variation channels to make their video. The most I cannot understand is why someone thought the idea to make Pocoyo & Masha crossover than into sound variations? That's waste potential! and the videos feel like the horrible Youtube Kids videos! Weather Top Wizard (talk) 11:37, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Message
Hi This Is kennethmank13 And I would like to recreate the In The End: There's Always A Disney God, And Replacing With the most factual evidence i can find if thats ok with you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kennethmank13 (talk • contribs)

No. <span style="color: blue; text-decoration: inherit; -moz-text-decoration-color: blue; text-decoration-color: blue;">wizzito &#124; <span style="color: navyc; text-decoration: inherit; -moz-text-decoration-color: navyc; text-decoration-color: navyc;">say hello!  16:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Not trying to be mean, but I struggle to understand what you mean, and why are you talking to me in the first place? I don't think I've reverted any of your edits before. <span style="color: blue; text-decoration: inherit; -moz-text-decoration-color: blue; text-decoration-color: blue;">wizzito &#124; <span style="color: navyc; text-decoration: inherit; -moz-text-decoration-color: navyc; text-decoration-color: navyc;">say hello!  23:43, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

An Award for You
Hi. Although you've been editing here for a while, so you're not quite a newcomer, it looks like you've been doing a lot more this year. You're doing a good job!

Please don't block me
I promise that I won't make any more disruptive edits, and this time I mean it. NewFan1502 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 00:52, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Virginia GNIS cleanup
Hi Wizzito, I see you're working on cleaning up GNIS stubs. Have you considered proposing a bulk-delete of unimproved GNIS stubs created by Ser Amantio di Nicolao? Given that there are hundreds/thousands of these, it might be the best way to go, rather than sending them through AFD/Prodding them one-at-a-time. This was how many of the stubs created by Carlossuarrez46 have been dealt with. When Ser Amantio di Nicolao literally created 24 of these articles in five minutes (see 17 December 2010 here), I can't believe many people are going to argue that they are valuable and should be kept, unless anyone has substantially improved on them in the meantime. FOARP (talk) 16:40, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

I'm hesitant on doing so because some of them might actually be legitimate communities, but that does sound like a good idea, just probably need to filter such a list first. <span style="color: blue; text-decoration: inherit; -moz-text-decoration-color: blue; text-decoration-color: blue;">wizzito &#124; <span style="color: navyc; text-decoration: inherit; -moz-text-decoration-color: navyc; text-decoration-color: navyc;">say hello!  03:16, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

please see my message above <span style="color: blue; text-decoration: inherit; -moz-text-decoration-color: blue; text-decoration-color: blue;">wizzito &#124; <span style="color: navyc; text-decoration: inherit; -moz-text-decoration-color: navyc; text-decoration-color: navyc;">say hello!  11:28, 7 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi Wizzito. Agree that some methodology should be applied to exclude articles that have been expanded or which are based on more than just GNIS. However, if we are expected to do a full WP:BEFORE on every single one of these articles, which typically took a matter of seconds to put together, often by simply cutting/pasting material out of the GNIS database, this will take for eternity. FOARP (talk) 11:32, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

"Traumagenic system" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Traumagenic system. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 10 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,Rosguill talk 21:09, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Just got your talk the thing
0k dude, the citation is already in the body I get where ur coming from but let me have the non existant internet points. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Das Kittles (talk • contribs) 19:50, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't exactly check the body beforehand. <span style="color: hotpink; text-decoration: inherit; -moz-text-decoration-color: hotpink; -webkit-text-decoration-color: hotpink; text-decoration-color: hotpink;">wizzito &#124; <span style="color: navyc; text-decoration: inherit; -moz-text-decoration-color: navyc; -webkit-text-decoration-color: navyc; text-decoration-color: navyc;">say hello!  21:02, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Apology
I'm sorry for constantly disrupting Wikipedia by making unconstructive edits to ist of Young Sheldon episodes page. To be honest, I wasn't even disruptive. I was changing the air date for Season 5 episode 9. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.9.132.42 (talk) 01:36, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, it's just that I have seen a lot of disruptive editors who make unsourced date changes with no edit summary on many different articles. wizzito &#124;  say hello!  01:39, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Apology
The next time I make an edit to List of Young Sheldon episodes page, I will add an edit summary so no one thinks it's disruptive. Also, the air date for Season 5 Episode 9 was a reliable source, according to The Futon Critic website on the Young Sheldon listing page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.9.132.42 (talk) 02:46, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

That's fine (and what you should be doing anyways, so nobody gets confused) wizzito  &#124;  say hello!  04:38, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Hunter Hanson
Hello, Wizzito. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hunter Hanson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Running into an issue
There’s a user at 2021 in American television who’s removing the same info repeatedly and did so again even when it was sourced, and I don’t quite have a grasp of which templates are where yet. They’re not being very communicative in their edit summaries and when they do they’re making declarations without even discussing it. It’s just not pleasant, so I’d like some assistance dealing with it.--141.157.254.24 (talk) 02:54, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

I'm not sure how to deal with it besides maybe taking your concerns to the administrator's noticeboard. An admin can help you there. wizzito &#124;  say hello!  02:56, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * They reported me for vandalism, apparently. And when I gave a 3RR warning and a notice about putting them on the Edit warring noticeboard, they removed it, said I had no power to do so, and they called it harassment, adding to their report--141.157.254.24 (talk) 06:28, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Wow You're Right About The Series It Was Based On Disney Parks
Thank You For Helping Because I Love Disney 186.220.197.235 (talk) 12:09, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Harvey Endings Revert
Dear Wizzito, I think there was a misunderstanding regarding the reversion of my edit in the episode section "Harvey Endings". You see, i have knowledge about the series in general and i can assure that the summary i made of the mentioned episode is authentic. --181.73.105.54 (talk) 01:42, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

The reason why I reverted your edit was because of the TV style guideline on plot summaries; more specifically that plot summaries for TV episodes in episode tables (like the ones in List of Harvey Girls Forever! episodes) shouldn't be more than 200 words long. You're free to expand on plot summaries as long as you meet that limit. wizzito &#124;  say hello!  14:28, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh!, i see. See ya. --181.73.105.54 (talk) 16:20, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Francis Bourgeois (trainspotter)
No problem, I will provide some better feedback on the talkpage. Koncorde (talk) 14:39, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Say hello!
Hi Wizzito, thank you for letting me know!Apolo1991 (talk) 14:52, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

You're welcome. You might want to take your survey to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States History wizzito  &#124;  say hello!  14:53, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

I have already posted it there! Apolo1991 (talk) 14:56, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

deletion of the article about mireille redford saba
hello, good day your having? because I'm not, i have my finals this week and i had 2 hours of sleep last night, i don't know if you have a personal agenda or something against us, but i would like to discuss what you said in one of your points: "This course seeks to develop students’ intellectual viewpoints and a writing voice through writing Wikipedia articles about Arab and Lebanese authors who have little to no digital presence (neither in Arabic nor in English). In order to preserve this literary heritage, this class will work on producing Wikipedia articles about Arab and Lebanese literary figures who might otherwise become long forgotten since they are rarely taught in the Lebanese curriculum's literature courses."; personally, I think that forcing students to write articles on likely non-notable people isn't the best thing to do, but whatever. " you deleted my article on the week of my finals, me and my peers worked 2 months to create it so you, a tik tok fan, could come and say that one of the leading authors in my country is irrelevant because there not enough information online about her. My point is I don't think you're the best person to review my article, after seeing what domain you takle and please don't ever disrespect my professor who's a respectable Phd holder, nor her course, nor her student. please take this tip: don't tackle subjects you have no knowledge about plus I'm very tired and I'm sorry if my tone came off as angry Farid Chbeir (talk) 16:36, 6 December 2021 (UTC)


 * I'm not the one who nominated the article for deletion. Go to them if you have any problems. You could also go to . Please avoid insulting others in your comments like you just did, that's considered a personal attack and is against Wikipedia rules. wizzito  &#124;  say hello!  17:42, 6 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Also pinging as the nominator of the article being discussed.  wizzito  &#124;  say hello!  17:46, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

I'm sorry if I insulted you in any way but what you wrote about our course is really demoralising and not called for. How is it even relevent as to how my article was structured, you can't judge a whole group of people just because one of their articles was written in a bad fashion. What i'm trying to say is if you could please delete this comment, my doctor and classmates shouldn't be punished for something i did wrong. Plus we chose this course with our free will, we could have chosen a traditional English class, but we opted for a more fun and interactive course. Farid Chbeir (talk) 19:05, 6 December 2021 (UTC)


 * I wasn't even insulting your professor or course. Nobody is punishing you. And I can't delete the comment because the discussion is closed. wizzito  &#124;  say hello!  22:50, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Billy and Mandy had SIX seasons
Let me just remind you that there were six seasons of Billy and Mandy, because the 2003 episodes of Billy and Mandy were in fact episodes produced for Grim and Evil. --FlapjackRulez (talk) 06:34, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Do you have a source for this? Numerical data such as dates on kids' TV show articles are common targets for sneaky vandalism and hoaxes, so that's why I reverted your edit. wizzito &#124;  say hello!  06:57, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

The TRUTH About Grim & Evil - Chapter 2: Episode Guide Discrepancies This video shows it. Changing it to six seasons is not vandalism, it's a fact. --FlapjackRulez (talk) 19:34, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

YouTube videos are not considered reliable sources most of the time. wizzito  &#124;  say hello!  20:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Sorry.
Sorry, I promise I will never disrupt Wikipedia ever again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ToasyCake100 (talk • contribs) 08:42, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

You weren't disrupting; I was wrong and it turned out that someone had changed the dates incorrectly and nobody noticed; the page is now protected and the dates are now correct again. wizzito &#124;  say hello!  21:45, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Ratchet Feminism
I would like to strongly request that the page NOT be redirected to womanism. Ratchet feminism has been written about by numerous Black feminist scholars. The topic was given to students to write about so that they could contribute to the conversation. I am the instructor, who is also a Black feminist scholar who has published on this topic. I know that the Wikipedia assignment this semester was a disaster. I have learned a lot about teaching this assignment. However, I personally assisted in making sure that many of the requested edits were made. For context, these are mostly Black female students in a Black women & pop culture class learning about the censure or erasure of certain Black women's voices.

To tie ratchet feminism to womanism is highly problematic since ratchet feminism is a critique of the respectability politics in Black feminism and womanism. I am requesting that you allow edits, or take it down completely until we can work on the draft. I have reached out to other scholars familiar with the idea of "ratchet feminism" via Twitter to help edit this page. I recognize this being my first time doing this assignment, there were numerous pages that needed to be deleted, and remain deleted. I apologize for that. To erase this topic, however, is a mistake and speaks to some of the issues the assignment was initially trying to address. Mkibona (talk) 13:15, 15 December 2021 (UTC) Mkibona

- We weren't trying to erase the topic of ratchet feminism; it's just that you weren't discussing properly and going against consensus. It may be a notable topic, but you should probably create a draft, as by the advice on Talk:Ratchet Feminism wizzito  &#124;  say hello!  21:48, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

That 67 IP address
What should we do about this latest Elinor Wonders Why misinformation spreader? I don’t think they’ve made a single constructive edit so far.--CreecregofLife (talk) 00:09, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

I asked about multiple rangeblocks on their sockpuppet page, nothing yet... Sockpuppet investigations/HarveyTeenager wizzito  &#124;  say hello!  00:10, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Great, thanks. I noticed there was definitely a history on previous American television year pages--CreecregofLife (talk) 00:19, 16 December 2021 (UTC)