User talk:Wjejskenewr/Archive 1

February 2006
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - Whopper 14:47, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Your request for rollback
After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! Tiptoety talk 04:42, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback can be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback may be removed at any time.

RFA - recommend withdrawing
I recommend withdrawing your RFA after 24 hours or after the comments become repetitive. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  03:47, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I hope by this time next year you'll sail through.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  04:15, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Farmville
scuse you but I dont think i vandalized on farmvile page, i was right. how dare you call me wrong! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.118.212.25 (talk) 21:59, 13 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Your edit was on the page for Farmville, North Carolina. Your edit talking about the game FarmVille did not belong there, as there is already a wikipedia page for the game.   Please let me know if you have any more questions.  P Carn (talk) 22:02, 13 December 2009 (UTC)


 * can you send meh the link to theh game page PUHLEAS? 69.118.212.25 (talk) 22:07, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The page for the game is FarmVille. P Carn (talk) 22:09, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Shaun Suisham
Precisely my point. Three was bias in the Suisham article. He did not have "poor performances" two weeks in a row. He missed three field goals in three games ... not back to back games ... and those were his only misses of the season. The current claim of "poor performances" is an editorial opinion. It's also factually inaccurate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.182.185.252 (talk) 02:45, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I have taken your comments into consideration, and changed the original edit so that it is not biased. The problem with your edit is that it was also biased.  I believe that the article is now fine how it is.  P Carn (talk) 02:55, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

??
why was my last edit considered vandalism? you never gave a reason —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.161.46.44 (talk) 05:27, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Your edit was not deemed meaningful enough to stay in the article. If you disagree, please post a comment on the talk page for the article to discuss it with others. --P Carn (talk) 05:30, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Gillette, Wyoming
Thanks for helping here; the person or people behind these IPs doesn't/don't understand that the customary practice is to include only people with articles in notable people sections, and that the few exceptions to this rule don't include beauty queens. Nyttend (talk) 05:53, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Chevrolet 300C STR8 tests
P Carn,

Ill have you know that i had the opportunity to test one of the str4 dodge neon and a Chrysler 300C str8 on a track test day. Would you like me to send the results of this test? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.7.254.137 (talk) 14:20, 16 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately, Wikipedia does not allow original research in the articles. The article will use published results by a verified, reliable resource.  Please see here for more information on the policy.  P Carn (talk) 16:13, 16 December 2009 (UTC)


 * If I may add a little more to this discussion, I have had extensive experience drag racing the SRT-4, as I actually own one, and the numbers that are referenced in the SRT-4 article are, if anything, conservative. I was able to get a 13.9 out of mine, with practice.  Therefore it should come as no surprise that an experienced reviewer who writes for a car magazine would be able to drive even faster, as the 13.8 would indicate.  The fastest stock SRT-4 ran in the 13.6 range, I've seen the video.  However, just as P Carn stated above, this cannot be used as this is original research.  If you (being user IP number 74.7.254.137) actually did drive the SRT-4 Neon at an SRT Track Day, that means it has been at least 3 years since you did so, and also you would have been driving a car that is driven very hard for every mile of its existence. I know, I also drove at this event at Joliet, Illinois, as an owner myself.  Each car may drive a little differently, but generally the newer they are the more likely they are to perform close to manufacturer's specifications, which is why it is important to use only verifiable magazine reviews to provide evidence for numbers that are listed here at Wikipedia.  Trust me, if we allowed original research here, the SRT-4 page would explode into a massive argument, and I'm sure every Honda page would be exactly the same, pretty much any sporty car.  I hope this explains a little better why "personal experience" is not allowed as it is next to impossible to verify.  RTShadow (talk) 03:51, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

hi
RE: This revert -- he was smart enough to delete his own contribution. It's a copyvio :) Cheers! Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 06:39, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, thank you. That's why it is helpful to provide edit summaries so the editors know what is happening. P Carn (talk) 06:41, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

YOU CHANGED YOUR NAME?
Hello, I was wondering why you changed your name, in my perspective, Mr. Moose is way cooler than P Carn. Leave me a reply at this talk page:Micro 101 (talk) 19:42, 19 December 2009 (UTC)Micro 101

What do you mean bias
I am contradicting the BIAS views that are being represented in Henry Morris's view. They should contain Henry's view not other people. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Doc1st (talk • contribs) 22:55, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The structure of your edit was biased in itself. If you believe that the article was not correct, please post on the article's talk page to discuss it with other editors, and come to a consensus.  P Carn (talk) 22:58, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Cupeyville School
Umm, all the information displayed in Cupeyville School should be removed then because everything is taken from the official site. Guliple07676767 (talk) 22:57, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * There is no problem taking information from the original site, as long as you properly cite it. The reason your edits were reverted is because you were removing content, and adding your signature to the bottom of the article page. P Carn (talk) 23:01, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Why is expressing Henry Morris's views Biased?
You should look at the content already on there that DO NOT express his view first. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Doc1st (talk • contribs) 23:00, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * As I said, the problem was not in his quote, it was in the way that you explained the quote, calling out the other edits as biased. That has no place in the article.  If the content truly is biased, I recommend you discuss it on the talk page for the article.  P Carn (talk) 23:03, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * So I revised it but then another user had removed it. I dont understand why other peoples views can be posted where Henry Morris's views should be. I think that the editors should really rewrite this piece. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Doc1st (talk • contribs) 23:09, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, that is fine, please post that on the talk page. It was not right for you to post your personal thoughts on the article's page.  Encyclopedia's don't have personal thoughts.  P Carn (talk) 23:13, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Giblets
Hello, I wonder why you delete my contribution to wikipedia? I am a french chef from Lyon and wish to share my knowledge of traditional french dish giblet two ways with fèces oeuf soupe. Why you take down? This real recipe and important for other brother-chefs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sherrymantha (talk • contribs) 02:36, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Your edit was both inappropriate and obviously not true. Feces are not ever safe for consumption, and that "dish" does not belong in the article.  P Carn (talk) 02:41, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

I am shocked by your ignorance of French cuisine. Normally it is we French who are ignorant of non-French ways, but you take the cake... (or should I say you take the croissant!!). The shit in egg-shit soup (fèces oeuf soupe) is a name peasants in Lyon give to the brown colour of the egg-yolk after it is mixed with brown-sugar. A tasty, traditional dish from Lyon!

hey
you beat me to adding a warning to Horcrux I was trying out a new tool. cheers --Guerillero (talk) 02:55, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, that's just how it goes. Good luck.  P Carn (talk) 02:57, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Newbie Tip
Hello P Carn, if you are interested in helping out new users (newbies) here's the link:WP: ADOPT. Most of the Newbies I talk to have failed in making new articles or making large edits(I admit I did attempt a merge) so you should tell them to start small, Have a happy new year! Micro101 16:14, 26 December 2009 (UTC)Micro101

Neurosexism
Apologies if I switched the CSD cat on you, I've been watching this, its a recreation of an article that was previously speedied...same user, I figure that they'll shoot themselves in the foot as they haven't bothered to engage in any conversation, just keep doing the same thing over and over! Frmatt (talk) 02:59, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Adoption
Thanks for your offer! Now what should I do to show that I've been adopted? --Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 00:05, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * On your user page you can put .  P Carn (talk) 01:23, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Adoption and Some Questions
Hi! Thank you for offering to adopt me! I saw that you mainly deal w/ reverting vandalism on Wiki, but I had a couple of random questions that I am hoping you'll be able to answer. :) The first is about images. I know that we can only use certain images (fair use, or something to that effect) on Wikipedia. I was just wondering what the details are of that, such as what that exactly means and how one could tell if an image meets those standards? Also, I had some questions related to rating articles. I understand how (and when) to change the rating of an article from a Stub to B-Class (or anything in between); however, I was wondering what the process/requirements would be to change an article rating/class to something higher than that? (I believe the next rating is Good Article, but please correct me if I am mistaken.) Thank you for your time! -- arm oren o10 07:32, 18 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Hello! 1) Images must be free and not hold any copyright.  Creative Commons is a great way to search for images that meet that.  For more information, see [].  2) Feel free to change the rating of any article that you see fit.  The next rating about B-Class that you should use is A-Class.  Good Article and Featured Article tags are reserved for articles that have been reviewed as designated as such.  There are no strict requirements for re-assessing articles, it is informal.   See [] for more details.  P Carn (talk) 01:10, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Respone to offer of adoption
Thank you for your response on my talk page. The article of which I am the subject is Gavan McDonell and if you go there you will see that editors have put templates indicating its style, which is rather like a resume, needs to be changed and also that it needs more links to other relevant articles to reduce its orphanhood. I noticed these not long ago. I could help with both and also make it more useful by showing other references but I don't want to edit the article myself because I am the subject, and I'm not sure what wikipedia considers relevant in biographical articles like this. if you could make some suggestions I would be most grateful. Antlion1932Antlion1932 (talk) 03:50, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page :) --5 albert square (talk) 01:46, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Just doing my job. P Carn (talk) 01:47, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

RfA (edit count)
Note that while you have 5K edits, a significant portion of those edits are "automated" which a number of users will hold against a total edit count. Note that it is the quality of an edit not the quantity of edits that counts... -- RP459  Talk/Contributions 03:15, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Your RFA
Hello, I recently closed your RFA as unsuccessful. Please take the community's advice at the RFA to heart, and continue to work productively. I'm sure in a few months you'll be more than ready to come back again and get the bit. Good luck and happy editing! &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  essay  // 09:29, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry it didn't pass. I know how it feels :). The opposers raise good points which you can work on. Better luck next time ;), Airplaneman  talk 16:57, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry to tell you that I never made an edit to the beautiful people page. I have never actually visited the page. I beleive that you have made a mistake and that you have confused me for someone else. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.125.221.173 (talk) 17:23, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Jacobsen v. Katzer
It looks like you reverted 20 edits on the Jacobsen v. Katzer page (most of which were reversions of a set of disputed edits and one of which was an explanation) and marked the reversion as minor and didn't give any explanation for your reversion or update the talk page. As per WP:MINOR, please don't mark edits that might be disputed (as this one clearly would be) as minor.

But if you're able to get involved and help diffuse the growing edit war on this article (including allegations of conflict-of-interest by legal antagonists and attempted outings), that would be most appreciated. Thanks, Npdoty (talk) 06:59, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Re your intervention abot "Etaples Mutiny"
The entry as you restored it is wrong, with irrelevant pointers to unrelated events. In addition, it was, at some point, modified with a definite sprinkling of marxist distortion. Good luck with it. I am not b... likely to return Holuigue (talk) 22:50, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Mistake
I have no idea what you are talking about. I have never edited the article you describe. I have had a named account for at least 1 1/2 years - never a numbered account. Please look elsewhere for your vandal. I sincerely hope you find who it is. Thank you. Mugginsx (talk) 14:48, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

RE Last update
It is not vandalizing the WWPX page it is part of the station's history as part of the history of the Analog Channel 60 in Martinsburg,WV You can not change history nor fact those logos was used for channel 60 when it was WYVN-TV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jckenyon (talk • contribs) 21:18, 30 December 2010 (UTC)