User talk:Wjjefferies

File source problem with File:Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:09, 8 March 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:09, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:10, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 William Jefferies, Jr., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! EagerToddler39 (talk) 17:48, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.


 * Thanks much for the article on William Jefferies Jr. While reviewing the article I came across a site run by his family. One relative supplied a comprehensive biography about him here http://old.williamjefferies.org/genealogy/Media/JefferiesWilliam1831-Biography2.html. Although this source may not be suitable for use in an encyclopedic article I used it as reference for his dates and place of birth and death. Locating the source, however, shows that there is more information out there about this personality if some thorough searching is done of reputable sources. I would appreciate your expanding the article as best as possible with whatever additional information you can find from reliable sources. EagerToddler39 (talk) 17:54, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of William Jefferies, Jr. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Jefferies, Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/William Jefferies, Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Coretheapple (talk) 18:51, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

February 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 19:06, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Your attention needed at WP:CHU
Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. Aspening (talk) 14:13, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Andreas Widmer


The article Andreas Widmer has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Promotional article, showing no evidence of notability under WP:NPROF, WP:NBIO, WP:GNG or any other notability guideline. Sources are non-RS dead links. A WP:BEFORE shows news coverage of other people of the same name."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 12:14, 7 August 2021 (UTC)