User talk:Wjmummert

 ''Thanks for visiting my talk page. You may want to [ Watch] this page until I reply. Please sign your comments by inserting four tildes ( ) at the end of your statement.'' [ NOW GO AHEAD AND SPEAK YOUR MIND]''

Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg
Hi, I noticed your non-free logo, [[Media:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg|1914 Logo]] and noticed you didn't use the fair use rationale template, please do so in a week, or your page will be speedy deleted. Thanks, and sorry for the inconvienence.Cssiitcic (talk) 22:13, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Oops! I am so sorry. Please disregard the above message. Your rationale is fine. Again, sorry, your article will not be speedy-deleted.Cssiitcic (talk) 22:18, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * No Prob! Wjmummert (KA-BOOOOM!!!!) 00:59, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I checked, and you still have a GIF image of the 1914 logo--[[Media:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg]]. The PNG was deleted. Since we have the GIF, I don't think restoring the PNG is needed, but I do recommend using the Non-Free Uses Rationale Template, so the GIF doesn't get deleted as well. Please feel free to reply on my talkpage. Thanks. Goodbye.Cssiitcic (talk) 20:23, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Retired Cubs Numbers
Hi. I noticed your edit and 31 is not an official retired number, therefore, it should not be up. If you would like to leave it in the text portion of the section, feel free. But 31 does not fly at Wrigley Field and has not been officialy retired by the Cubs. Thanks. Rwhollywoodfan (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I disagree. What you mentioned about the number not being retired is true, but the fact that the club officially had the number reserved in noteworthy enough to have it mentioned alongside the other numbers.  It clearly stated Reserved and not Retired.  If you have an issue with this, please discuss it on the articles talk page and voice your opinion there.  I created those templates nearly a year ago and you are the first person to take issue with them, and I mean no disrespect but you are not a regular editor on this page, so I immediately reversed your previous edit.


 * By the way, the Jackie Robinson one looks very nice, but sadly does not look very good with the other templates so I will leave it how it is. That is, until an agreement is reached.  The number will be retired sooner rather than later.  I always welcome help on this article, but in the future discuss changes like this first.  Thanks.Wjmummert (KA-BOOOOM!!!!) 04:07, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Ok fair enough. And that edit war was ridiculous by the way. Sorry about that. I understand what you are saying. Oh and hopefully 09 will be the year! Thanks again. Rwhollywoodfan (talk) 04:18, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Dempster
I agree with you there. Ever since Ryan came off Tommy John surgery, his arm has been held together by rubber-bands and paperclips. At the best, he has no more than three good seasons left in him before his arm breaks apart. Do not get me wrong, I still think he's a good player and great guy, but they should have tried offering the money/contract to a younger player. Whats up with Wood wanting a multi-year contract? He's a fuckin' millionaire and he wants a pricey multi-year contract? He belongs in a Cub uniform, and with an organization that he can trust. He should take a pay cut, and retire with the Cubs. --  StarScream1007  ►Talk  06:53, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * So much for that.... Wjmummert (KA-BOOOOM!!!!) 00:06, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Pulp Fiction (film)
Do not redirect pages without discussing and achieving consensus on the talk page. The redirect you made was discussed previously (it's in the archives) with consensus to leave it like it is. Your unilateral decision to redirect violated that consensus as well as the spirit of the consensus-building process. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 18:12, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

White Panther
Yes you have to actually use the admin tools at the top of the page to actually protect the article. Anyone can put the template in but that doesn't protect it, an administrator still has to do the actual protection action.

--Wgfinley (talk) 21:31, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Usually when you do that it alerts them to do so.... you are right. thanks.  Wjmummert (KA-BOOOOM!!!!) 21:34, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm on the case, let me know if more nonsense shows up, I'm on top of Aaron Gray now, should have guessed that. --Wgfinley (talk) 16:37, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Senator-designate
You article, "Senator-designate," is well-intentioned, but I merged it into United States Senate. It was just a two-sentence article without sources or references. It had no reason for being a separate and distinct article. I think it is better served redirecting readers to United States Senate. —Markles 11:39, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Cub Warmups.JPG
File:Cub Warmups.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Larry Rothschild.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 05:21, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

United States Senate
If no one else responds at Talk:United States Senate really soon, I'd say take it as consensus. Also, try to restore the Seniority section. I don't know if you meant to delete it, but it really should be there. If it was tucked into another new section, never mind. -Rrius (talk) 01:05, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * When you say "take it as a consensus" I assume you mean my revisions being acceptable. That was my plan. Wjmummert (KA-BOOOOM!!!!) 01:15, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Rosatis.gif)
You've uploaded File:Rosatis.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 14:13, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Barry Obama
I took out your reference to his former nickname on the Obama page. The name is covered in the "Early Life" section, and really isn't needed in the lede. I've commented on the talk page about it. Cheers, PhGustaf (talk) 03:15, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Forgot to mention that I'd like to see a Cubs/Red Sox series before I die, too. PhGustaf (talk) 03:17, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

United States Senate template
Just like the last reorganization at United States Senate, you deleted United States Senate, and didn't replace it. If you have a problem with that template, you should take it to the talk page. -Rrius (talk) 01:46, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * From what I can tell, the main thing you did was move section on qualifications above the one on the oath, which makes sense. You also fixed a quote template. You should note that years are usually not wikilinked unless they are part of full date for autoformatting purposes (which is itself controversial at the moment). -Rrius (talk) 20:11, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Award
Thanks for the Cubs Barnstar. I appreciate it! By the way, what do you think of Hendry's decision to pick up Bradley... and give him Sammy's old uniform number? --  StarScream1007  ►Talk  05:34, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Marquis only gave up the #21 a day or 2 earlier when he was dealt to Colorado. (A move that makes no sense unless they do end up with Peavy or another #1 starter, by the way.) I am not a big Sammy fan anymore, but seeing that he played in Chicago most of his career and was very good for a long time, he deserves his #21 to be flying on the foul poles, as does Gabby Hartnett, for that matter (Led us to 4 pennants in the 1930's).... Wjmummert (KA-BOOOOM!!!!) 20:08, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:MSSS.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:MSSS.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:45, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Michael Clarke Duncan
Have you really seen Michael Clarke Duncan on Trinity Broadcast Network? --Protostan (talk) 20:44, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * No, it was Tiny Lister. The two are often confused with one another. Wjmummert (KA-BOOOOM!!!!) 04:37, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

RE:W Flag
I was in Wrigleyville for the Cubs v. Reds game on Wednesday, and actually saw the 'W' Blackhawks shirt on sale from a street vender. I am not sure If it was licensed by either the Blackhawks or Cubs. There is no doubt that the tradition itself was borrowed from the Cubs Win flag, but I highly doubt it was started by the Blackhawks organization in an attempt to revitalize the hockey scene. I am not sure if it actually officially lisc'd - unless of course its on sale from the nhl/'hawks online shop.

If I recall correctly, the first hawks win flag surfaced around the early portion of the season - a black W with feathers, placed on white background. I am presuming ti was done by a season ticket holder, since its at every game, in the same spot. Nonetheless, the fact that blackhawks fans are using a similar flag should be mentioned in the article - though I kinda feel we should find a reference to make sure it stays in there.

Anywyas, I am doing great, I hope you are too. I am probably not going to be on much next week - finals. Glad to see you back. --  StarScream1007  ►Talk  18:03, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Chicagoland Area Update.GIF listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chicagoland Area Update.GIF, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Speciate (talk) 20:20, 28 May 2009 (UTC) Speciate (talk) 20:20, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Please clarify something at the FFD. The source link doesn't actually link to the map, or any unedited version of it. Also, if the ellipses show boundaries, it has to be based on some sort of source. Unless you can show what they're based on I have to agree with the nominator that it is original research. - Mgm|(talk) 08:58, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Jackie Robinson flag
I don't visit Wrigley (although I will in August for the Met game), but I recall there isn't a Robinson flag in the foul poles at Wrigley? I don't know, I had intense research of the retired flags with nothing of Robinson's number anywhere in Wrigley. If there is, please do tell me, thanks. --Dekabreak101 (talk) 01:32, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Chicagoland County Red.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Chicagoland County Red.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 16:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Chicago Cubs futility theories
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Chicago Cubs futility theories. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Chicago Cubs futility theories. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Chicago 3.1
You signed up at Meetup/Chicago 3. I thought you might want to sign up for Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Chicago 3.1 from 10:30-11:45 a.m. on Saturday May 1, 2010 at the UIC Student Center West.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:46, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Indy farmland
I was just looking at your Indy farmland.jpg aerial photo, and was curious if you knew more specifically what county the photo shows. Thanks! Huwmanbeing &#9728;  &#9733;  18:10, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * not exactly, but it is around Cass, White, Carol area. No further west than Jasper, it was taken on a flight from Indianapolis to Chicago Wjmummert (KA-BOOOOM!!!!) 16:45, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks! That was enough to let me positively identify the scene: southeastern Benton County looking northeast into White County, west of Brookston and Chalmers.  Huwmanbeing  &#9728;  &#9733;  18:01, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Ghost town, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calico, California (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Fansatwrigleybar2003.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fansatwrigleybar2003.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:33, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:MSSS.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MSSS.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:06, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Meatheads Burgers & Fries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Meatheads Burgers & Fries for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meatheads Burgers & Fries is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Meatheads Burgers & Fries until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 04:20, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of the Chicago Cubs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Franchise (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Buona Beef


A tag has been placed on Buona Beef requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TheLongTone (talk) 22:09, 24 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Regarding the message you left on my talk page: It would probably be best if you worked on this article in your own user space (for example User:Wjmummert/Buona Beef). That way you can improve it at your leisure without worrying about it being deleted again. When it's ready, it can be moved to main article space.
 * Also see WP:CORP. This restaurant will need significant coverage in more than just local sources for the article to be kept. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:58, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you.... I am accustomed to my Chicagoland food articles being contested, and they have always passed. However, the sources will, of course be regional. It would be foolish to expect an USA today article on something that is not national.  There are far less notable items on Wikipedia than this. BTW I have no association with any of the businesses I have added. Wjmummert (KA-BOOOOM!!!!) 16:05, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Lou malnati product pix.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lou malnati product pix.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:41, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:McGraw Construction.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:McGraw Construction.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:30, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chicago Cubs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pat Hughes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:27, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Bartman pic
Sorry, but you really can't claim to be the copyright owner. It might be possible to include the pic with a fair use rationale. Zagal e jo^^^ 17:53, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

File:CHC-MLB-alternate.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CHC-MLB-alternate.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:17, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Male Masturbatng
Um Excuse me I am NOT circumcised, plus they needed another picutre on that articleThemccoy301 (talk) 22:37, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

File:1920 cub logo.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1920 cub logo.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 01:47, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Amateur Softball Association (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Composite


 * Community colleges in the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Urban


 * Vitamin C (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Opaque

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:33, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ryder Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Biennial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:03, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits to the Chicago article
Hey there, I noticed you recently added a substantial amount of uncited material to the Chicago article. I'm not trying to exert ownership of the article, but I've been working hard to get everything verifiable as we work to promote the article GA status. Anyway you could address this? Also adding edit summaries would be helpful to understand your intentions. More info on our goals on the talk page. Cheers &mdash; MusikAnimal talk 21:07, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I hope you're not offended that reverted your edits. They are in the history so not permanently gone. If there's anyway we could improve your contributions before applying them that would be best. Namely, what you stated as the origin of the nicknames conflicts with what the sources say on the List of nicknames for Chicago article. Let me know if I can help! &mdash; MusikAnimal talk 22:35, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm never offended by a revert, this is a hobby not my career so it's fine. I was not aware that a list of Chicago nicknames page existed. And keep in mind that there is always more than one source showing something slightly different. I try to keep mine credible.  I thought the section needed some definition of the sections of the city to give a reader a clearer picture of WHY those names exist.  As far as that goes I was interrupted by RL when sourcing that section thus I'm not surprised it was changed. I just do not understand why you would revert it instead of improve it, if you feel that it needed some sort of improvement.  But either way, it's no big deal and none of my business. I am happy to tackle any projects you need help with, I will check out the page when RL allows me time. Wjmummert (KA-BOOOOM!!!!) 16:34, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Your userboxes
Not to bash on you, but I had to point out that on your user page you claim you are a senior editor which you are not as that would require 24,000 edits over a course of 4 years. Strangely you insinuate this in the adjacent userbox where it says you have 6,500+ edits, yet that is also untrue, you are still under 6,000 edits. Anyways, none of my business really, the userbox I really care about is the one saying you're part of WikiProject Chicago. I'd love for you to help us out on the Chicago article. Just take a look at our To-Do List on the talk page and feel free to take a stab at anything, just make sure to cite sources and leave an edit summary. Thanks and cheers &mdash; MusikAnimal talk 03:00, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Will do - I checked senior editor and you are right, I read it as over 4 years OR XYZ edits. Aye yi yi. Either way, I doubt anyone cares, I'm not running for admin.  Wjmummert (KA-BOOOOM!!!!) 16:23, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mark Grace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Organ (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Mark Grace.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mark Grace.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:36, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Boz sign lansing.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Boz sign lansing.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:37, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:ROSATISBOX.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ROSATISBOX.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:40, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Reed Construction.jpeg
 Thanks for uploading File:Reed Construction.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Armbrust The Homunculus 00:56, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Buona Beef


The article Buona Beef has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern: Buona Beef – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability. Please see the plain-language summary of our notability guidelines.'''
 * '''A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Speciate (talk) 00:18, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your opinion is valued at WikiProject Breakfast
Please see Want to be a guinea pig for Flow?. XOttawahitech (talk) 14:44, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jeff Bridges, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cameo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Edit Of Chicago Cubs
I do not have any memory what-so-ever of editing that page.Do you think someone may have leaked into my I.P?--108.163.116.18 (talk) 22:48, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Unregistered Wikipedia User.

Articles for deletion/Tehmeena Afzal
Please note that you have added the AfD template to the article but somehow failed to create the deletion nomination. I created it for you.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:32, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Thats odd, but thank you very much. Wjmummert (KA-BOOOOM!!!!) 05:55, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Recent edits to Jack-in-the-box
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. There was no source for the change, it seemed inconsistent with the previous text, and included a mis-spelling. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! hamiltonstone (talk) 02:05, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Edit to Chicago Cubs
Hey. Can you explain what was going on in this edit? Were you trying to add a link to an archive? —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 18:32, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Indy farmland poster
Dear Jasen,

I love your Indy farmland image and would like to use it as a background image of a poster I prepare for a conference.

Do you happen to have a higher-resolution version of the image, that is better suited for an A0-sized poster? Thanks! --Erel Segal (talk) 12:01, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HoneyJamCafe.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:HoneyJamCafe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:49, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Golden Eagle CSU-Global.jpeg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Golden Eagle CSU-Global.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:37, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Squadron Sinister, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marvel's Avengers Assemble. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Avengers Assemble (TV series)
 * added a link pointing to Hyperion


 * Justice League
 * added a link pointing to Avengers Assemble

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * List of Marvel Comics characters: B
 * added a link pointing to Braniac


 * Squadron Supreme
 * added a link pointing to Braniac

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michael Alan Johnson


The article Michael Alan Johnson has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not a notable actor. Most notable role wasn't even on all real TV show

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JDDJS (talk) 17:47, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Michael Alan Johnson for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Alan Johnson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Michael Alan Johnson& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JDDJS (talk) 17:55, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cosmic microwave background, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Opaque and Plasma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Martian Manhunter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doomsday. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Blue Book Network, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bid. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St. Paul Saints, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Integration. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Manta (web site) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manta (web site) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Manta (web site) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. bonadea contributions talk 09:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo Harry Caray Steaks.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Logo Harry Caray Steaks.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:57, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Chicago Cubs into History of the Chicago Cubs. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. It's also important to not only copy the prose, but to bring along the supporting citations. I have added the citations for you this time. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:58, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Suckers movie.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:Suckers movie.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:58, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Using "Indy farmland" in documentary
Hi Wjmummert,

I am a filmmaker currently working on a documentary about the Appalachian Trail.

One section of my film is about how subdivisions of rural land made it important for the federal government to protect the Trail. I found your image "Indy farmland" from August 28, 2008, and think it would perfect to help illustrate this topic.

I see that you have released the image into the public domain, but, as a courtesy, I wanted to inform you. If there is a specific way you would like the image to be credited in the film, please let me know.

Thank you, Thaddeus Lamar — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:5C4:C400:C4C2:7544:3DE6:7862:3A77 (talk) 19:16, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Too much plot adding in Sing (2016 American film)
Please read WP:FILMPLOT and see the talk page pertaining to Sing (2016 American film). The plot does not need any more details. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 04:49, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rosati's


A tag has been placed on Rosati's requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. JibuWoooooooooooah (talk) 21:33, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Survey Invite
I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_bNuHImK1Gk8FQgZ&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 22:59, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Rosati's for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rosati's is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rosati's until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JibuWoooooooooooah (talk) 21:45, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Cubs1932.gif


The file File:Cubs1932.gif has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused logo with no article used."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 16:16, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

File:The w flag.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The w flag.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo for csu global.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Logo for csu global.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Rosatis storefront.jpg


The file File:Rosatis storefront.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Tampa 44.JPG


The file File:Tampa 44.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Meatheads burgers logo.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Meatheads burgers logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of This Old Cub


The article This Old Cub has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unsourced article, no proof of meeting WP:NFILM"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 19:20, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

"Senator designate" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Senator designate and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 26 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:00, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

"Senate-designate" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Senate-designate and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 26 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:00, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

"Senate designate" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Senate designate and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 26 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:00, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

"Senator-designate" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Senator-designate and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 26 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:01, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Disney animated universe characters for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Disney animated universe characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Disney animated universe characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Rorshacma (talk) 15:55, 30 June 2022 (UTC)