User talk:Wjp27947

Welcome!

Hello, Wjp27947, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as William John Peacock, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Pontificalibus (talk) 10:08, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of William John Peacock


A tag has been placed on William John Peacock requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pontificalibus (talk) 10:08, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Status and Advice
As reviewing administrator, I  think he makes at least a show of notability ,so tIdid't delete the article. However, you must actually demonstrate this by references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. With them, it might stand. Without them, it will undoubtedly be deleted. I advise you to do this very quickly, before the article gets nominated for deletion by a regular deletion process. Were there any awards? References to them is very helpful. Any publications? And be sure not to copy any of this from a website.  DGG ( talk ) 10:34, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of William John Peacock for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William John Peacock is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/William John Peacock until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pontificalibus (talk) 10:45, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Are you William John Peacock?
If so, please be aware of WP's WP:Conflict of interest and WP:Autobiography policies. PamD (talk) 14:12, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * And note that if you/he are/is better known as "John Peacock" as it seems here, then the article should be at that name, with a "disambiguator" such as "(IT director)", and linked fromJohn Peacock disambiguation page. PamD (talk) 14:18, 8 March 2011 (UTC)