User talk:Wkd4evr

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 17:12, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

The recent edit you made has been reverted, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Specifically, copying the code of conduct wholesale (it's over 24k) is inappropriate. If commentary needs to be made on it, cite independent reliable sources where that's done, but don't include the whole code plus a few of what are apparently your own opinions. —C.Fred (talk) 17:12, 14 April 2009 (UTC)


 * They are not my own opinions. Reilly's policy is one of the most successful of it's type and has been mentioned in many case studies and reports. I now understand that it's inclusion took up the page, however I did not realise it was available on the asr website, hence my inclusion. I will source credits to the policy and mention it briefly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wkd4evr (talk • contribs)


 * That sounds like a better plan. If it is that widely regarded, cite one or two of the most prominent studies. Pulling a short (one-line) quote might even be appropriate. As far as describing the code itself, keep the mention high-level and stick to what the studies call the most significant parts of it. —C.Fred (talk) 17:25, 14 April 2009 (UTC)