User talk:Wladik Derevianko

RIA Novosti rumors
Hello, Wladik. Regarding your change in the Fobos-Grunt article, what convinced you that the RIA Novosti story is just a rumor? I was puzzled too that there are no other sources confirming this prediction, but lacking an explicit denial from the U.S. Strategic Command, I considered it to be a legitimate news story. I only found this MSNBC story, but it doesn't say the RIA Novosty story is made-up (it only says that it's possible that they picked up on a prediction and left out the part about the plus-or-minus uncertainty part). Razvan Socol (talk) 13:01, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

''Usually, the legitimate news story are taken from the news conference or from the published materials, like the organization's web site. At least there should be indicated a poin of contact so that other journalists can confirm the news without hiring the private detective. But the article of RIA Novisti looks like spreading some joke from the anonymous person.''Wladik Derevianko (talk) 21:57, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Re: Vectorization
I was simply reverting damage done by an earlier vandal. If you believe I removed or changed part of the article in error, feel free to reinstate and/or edit the article as you see fit. I personally have little knowledge on Vectorization. Thanks! EoRdE6 (talk) 01:00, 13 October 2014 (UTC)