User talk:Wmazz21

March 2017
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to James van Riemsdyk have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 08:48, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at James van Riemsdyk. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:59, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: James van Riemsdyk was changed by Wmazz21 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.986138 on 2017-03-03T17:59:14+00:00.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at James van Riemsdyk. Neil N  talk to me 18:01, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me 18:02, 3 March 2017 (UTC)