User talk:Wmhale

Kramer rayson
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kramer rayson, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.kramer-rayson.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:28, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Kramer Rayson, LLP
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kramer Rayson, LLP, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.kramer-rayson.com/pages/getPage/our-firm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:50, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Kramer Rayson, LLP
A tag has been placed on Kramer Rayson, LLP, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Grika Ⓣ 20:51, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Kramer rayson
Hello. The two versions were deleted as advertising (see the criteria for speedy deletion) but there may be deeper problems involved. First, you may be in a conflict of interest in regards to this article and that's a concern because neutrality and objectivity are cornerstones of Wikipedia (though it inevitably has a hard time imposing this). Second is the idea that the content of articles should be attributed to reliable, third-party sources. I don't know if such sources exist in the case of Kramer Rayson but if they do, that should be the basis of an article. The version you first submitted was a copy/paste from the firm's website and, on top of the copyright violation, is unacceptable because one can't expect an objective overview of a company from the company itself. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Best, Pascal.Tesson (talk) 22:25, 7 January 2009 (UTC)