User talk:WnMahluk

November 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to WNM has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:09, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: WNM was changed by WnMahluk (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.922104 on 2016-11-28T08:09:22+00:00.

Speedy deletion nomination of WnMahluk
Hello WnMahluk,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged WnMahluk for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:57, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at WNM, you may be blocked from editing. Adding a link to a self-promotional article you created could perhaps have been due to a sincere misunderstanding about what was acceptable in Wikipedia, but I do not see how you could have thought that removing legitimate content from the page was constructive. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:45, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to WNM has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:29, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: WNM was changed by WnMahluk (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959159 on 2016-12-19T14:29:14+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at WNM. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 17:19, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

September 2017
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on WNM. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Widefox ; talk 15:54, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.