User talk:Wnfck

March 2011
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on User_talk:Sitush, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 03:01, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Govind Kumar Singh, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Govind Kumar Singh was changed by Wnfck (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950924 on 2011-03-22T18:25:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:25, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Govind Kumar Singh
Please will you discuss the issues relating to Govind Kumar Singh on the article talk page. Once we have an agreement then, if necessary, things can be changed in the article itself. Edit warring gets us nowhere. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 18:30, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Govind Kumar Singh. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 18:33, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Let's Design, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 20:38, 24 March 2011 (UTC) --Wnfck (talk) 20:40, 24 March 2011 (UTC)its resolved --Wnfck (talk) 20:40, 24 March 2011 (UTC) only this user have problem please block this user.

Please respect other websites' copyrights
Your addition to Top upcoming designer 2011 has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. The text you added was copied wholesale from http://www.cottonusa.org/whatsnew.cfm?Itemnumber=3551. The site was already linked validly as a reference; the text of the article should not be copied in. —C.Fred (talk) 20:57, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Top upcoming designer 2011 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Top upcoming designer 2011 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Top upcoming designer 2011 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —C.Fred (talk) 16:32, 25 March 2011 (UTC)


 * To clarify: removing the Afd template from the article is disruptive and may lead to your account being blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 17:18, 25 March 2011 (UTC)


 * To further clarify, you are welcome to participate in the deletion discussion, the link for which is noted above. - Sitush (talk) 17:56, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Notability of Indo Swiss Show 2008
The article Indo Swiss Show 2008 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Every organization that has put on a show that Singh displayed his designs in is not inherently notable. This is especially true if more of the article talks about Singh than about the organization/show/award/other stated topic. Please review WP:Coatrack for more guidance about keeping the text of the article focused on the stated subject. —C.Fred (talk) 17:17, 25 March 2011 (UTC)