User talk:Wodgester/Archive 1

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Wodgester/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Wodgester/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:David.moreno72&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Wodgester/sandbox reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David. moreno 72   10:48, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Center Parcs Sherwood Forest (December 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Center Parcs Sherwood Forest and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Center Parcs Sherwood Forest, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and save.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Center_Parcs_Sherwood_Forest Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KJP1&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Center_Parcs_Sherwood_Forest reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KJP1 (talk) 14:24, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

October 2018
Hello, I'm L293D. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to 25th Armoured Engineer Brigade Royal Engineers— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. L293D (☎ • ✎) 18:34, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Really sorry, that was my bad. L293D (☎ • ✎) 18:45, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Right-o, thanks for the quick response. I don't suppose you could possibly explain to me what "self-closing the nowiki tag" means? Wodgester (talk) 18:51, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The  is an HTML tag that disables MediaWiki automatic formatting. The idea of a HTML tag is that you wrap text between, say   tags that looks like Text instead of Text. There's an opening tag  and a closing tag . a self-closed tag is a tag that closes itself, notice the difference in the placement of the  . I know I don't explain very well but its complicated. PS: the wikicode I've typed to explain is full of nowik and code tags to try and make it clearer, don't try to understand it from the code view. L293D (<b style="color:#000">☎</b> • <b style="color:#000">✎</b>) 02:12, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Gitsham (June 26)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by John from Idegon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paul Gitsham and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Paul Gitsham, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Paul_Gitsham Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:John_from_Idegon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Paul_Gitsham reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

John from Idegon (talk) 16:58, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Paul Gitsham concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Paul Gitsham, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Paul Gitsham


Hello, Wodgester. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Paul Gitsham".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! <b style="color:black">CptViraj</b> (📧) 17:14, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lucho Bermúdez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Lucho_Berm%C3%BAdez check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Lucho_Berm%C3%BAdez?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Law of triviality
Re: can we spend six months and involve a hundred editors in discussing whether that's the right image of a bike shed to use? Maybe we can go to arbcom with it! :)   --Guy Macon (talk) 08:21, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Take it all the way to the Supreme Court, I reckon. Reading that article, talkspace tomfoolery suddenly makes a lot more sense...! Merry Christmas, friend (if that's your cup of tea). Wodgester (talk) 14:51, 17 December 2020 (UTC)