User talk:Wodrow

September 2011
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Forster Square. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Trafford09 (talk) 16:41, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nao Bustamante


The article Nao Bustamante has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not a single source. Large number of POV statements. This is clearly an advertisement for her work, disguised as a Wiki entry.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Edit Summaries
Consensus is to Help:Edit_summary.

It's a shame you've so far shunned ESs - is there some reason why you've done so? Trafford09 (talk) 07:50, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * John Norquist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link to James Moody


 * Joseph Pulitzer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link to Republican Party

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

recent changes to macarthur fellows
Your recent changes to the macarthur fellows didnt quite make sense, so I rolled them back. Please feel free to re-edit them if you wish. dm (talk) 18:51, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)