User talk:Wojciakd

A tag has been placed on Sin City Neanderdolls, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Finngall  talk  22:45, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


 * {Copying from the article talk page in case it gets deleted before you see it there)
 * As far as I am aware, none of us are psychic. Therefore, we have no choice but to assess an article based on what's there, not what's going to be there.  If the article is improved, then I or someone else can remove the tag.  If the article is deleted, it can certainly be recreated, but if you do so, please don't post the same text all over again without improvements.  Please make yourself aware of Wikipedia's guidelines for notability--if you can't show that the Neanderdolls are notable under these standards, using references to independent, reliable sources, then there shouldn't be an article about them here.


 * With regard to the speed of the response: A number of us here troll the list of newly-created pages looking for spam, vandalism, vanity pages, and other nonsense. While your page certainly does not deserve condemnation as any of these things, I still thought it met the criteria for speedy deletion, and we aren't really under any obligation to "give it a chance".  The burden is on the author to create a suitable article.  The best solution is to refrain from posting an article before it is complete.  Either work on it offline and then copy and paste, or create a subpage of your user page to use as a private workspace, work on the article there, then move it to main article space when you are finished.


 * I will gladly answer any other questions you have. I hope this helps.  Thanks, and take care. -- Finngall   talk  23:34, 18 June 2007 (UTC)