User talk:Woland37/Archives/2008/August

Hadamard variance
This edit was rash. Grandted, it's a clumsily written article, but that's no reason to call it "unsalvageably incoherent"; it's a reason to improve it. Michael Hardy (talk) 21:39, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * It's just a tag, dude, and it was borderline. I do realize that I can be overly critical though and I am trying to loosen up and put improvement tags instead of spd tags when it seems warranted. Thanks for keeping it real.--Woland (talk) 21:46, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Help with Tone on RemoteView
I noticed you added the tone template, and just wanted to get some help with that as I did not know exactly what else might need to be done to achieve the proper tone for the article. let me know.  Tigey  Talk E-Mail 19:32, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Mantie
The term is clearly not intended to be vandalism. Please don't accuse newbies of vandalis unecessarily per WP:BITE. I've retagged the article as a7. JoshuaZ (talk) 19:40, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Roger that, dude.--Woland (talk) 19:42, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Holly_Ann_Collins
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holly_Ann_Collins I think that you should get a user that is fluent in dutch should go over it. Some of the sources are in my native language Dutch. Thank you. --Americangrantedasylumnetherlands (talk) 20:51, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll see what I can do!--Woland (talk) 20:56, 9 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I == Warrior Diet ==

Don't delete it! I plan to fill out more of it, but didn't get to it yet. Relax! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nutritiousmorsels (talk • contribs) 00:01, 10 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I am relaxed and I don't delete things since I am not an admin. I just nominate things that are eligible for speedy deletion . --Woland (talk) 18:36, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Brian Eddy deletion review
Hi! I'm just letting you know I've started a deletion review for the article on Brian Eddy:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2008_August_10

Please chime in! Thanks! Luvcraft (talk) 05:58, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Arthur B. Metzner
I've declined the speedy. Notability clearly asserted. Toddst1 (talk) 23:07, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * No argument here, I just calls 'em likes I sees 'em.--Woland (talk) 23:20, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Your userpage
Would semi-protection be of assistance? GbT/c 17:42, 16 August 2008 (UTC)


 * That would be totally sweet. Thanks.--Woland (talk) 17:49, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Done, indefinitely. Visit WP:RFPP to have it removed, and feel free to add (or not) the sprotected2 tag to the top of the text if you want to have the little silver padlock at the top left hand corner. GbT/c 17:57, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much.--Woland (talk) 18:00, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: Danke
No problem, you're welcome. De728631 (talk) 18:03, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

J. N. Adam & Co.
Hello! I have responded to the suggestions for additional notability documenation and references for the reknown J.N. Adam & Co. in Buffalo, New York. I am wondering what procedure needs to be gone through to have the comments removed from that entry? Thanks in advance---Ted--Pubdog (talk) 00:43, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

I don not understand why the links I have made to J.N. Adam & Co. from this page and other pages such as Associated Dry Goods are not active? The page is linked from the AM&A's page, but from nowhere else.

Please help! Ted--Pubdog (talk) 00:46, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Email hygiene
Hello, just a friendly note to say I think your CSD tag is in error. Please re-read WP:CSD -- the article may be poorly written but it's certainly not nonsense. justinfr (talk) 21:03, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I tagged it for prod under WP:NOTGUIDE but it looks like it's also a copyvio. So speedy delete it is! justinfr (talk) 21:11, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Sweet. My eyes get tired sometimes and I hit wrong buttons.--Woland (talk) 21:13, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I hear 'ya. Me too. justinfr (talk) 21:15, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

In regards to G4
In regards to your tagging of Vannesa sanderson, the speedy deletion criteria of G4 (reposted deleted material) only applies to material that was deleted after a community discussion, not to material that was speedily deleted. Often recreated material that was speedied can be speedied again for the same reason (as in this case), but it's recreation is not a reason in itself to delete. In fact we encourage user to address the problem which lead to the speedy deletion and recreate the article. Jon513 (talk) 21:40, 26 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Ah, thank you, I did not know that. --Woland (talk) 21:41, 26 August 2008 (UTC)