User talk:Woland37/Archives/2008/January

Race of Ancient Egyptians Template Removal
I added that template to generate discussion and you removed it without discussing it on the talk page. Though I don't care about that article anymore, in the future please add to discussion before making such changes. Thanks and peace-out.--Woland37 (talk) 12:07, 21 January 2008 (UTC) The template was simply to generate discussion as there were several users who expressed the same concerns that I did. Conflict and discussion is good I think. Anyway, no big whoop. I still don't think that its notable enough but other people do so thats good enough for me. Peace-out!--Woland37 (talk) 12:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * It seemed that there was no consensus to include the template. Frankly, the template itself is pretty worthless because it doesn't give any clear idea of what needs to be done to fix the article. The template says, "An editor has expressed concern that this article or section may be unencyclopedic and should be deleted. This is primarily a statement about the article's subject, not necessarily its quality or veracity." Do you really think that the subject of Race of ancient Egyptians is inherently "unencyclopedic"? As I noted in my edit summary, it has been discussed in numerous reliable sources, both popular and scholarly. *** Crotalus *** 12:10, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, fair enough. In the future, you might want to check out notability for concerns related to notability. Of course, if you don't think the article should exist, you can always merge or redirect it, but you should try to obtain a consensus for that first. *** Crotalus *** 12:27, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

i agree with you on the uncyclopedic template being added to the race of the ancient egyptians the question was rasied and hence the template should be added but as you can see the afrocentrics came out in full force and jumped down peoples throats to even thinking of having this article deleted such as ramdrake deeceevoice and futurebird there against deleteing it because they are obessed with the race of the ancients egyptians and think they are going to prove something by having this article, i quote the wacko deeceevoice("I GOT SOME INFO THAT WILL PROVE THAT TUT WAS A BLACKMAN)now when people make statements like that they have an agenda lol,this article is just arguementive non sence and is useless and is not encyclopedia.also dont you think its funny that wknight94 all of a sudden unprotected the page the day after somebody suggested the article should be deleted because it had been protected so long,very suspious right--Mikmik2953 (talk) 05:19, 22 January 2008 (UTC)