User talk:Wolf36979

Emily Addison image
Thanks for your additions to the Emily Addison page. I just wanted to let you know that I've removed the image from the infobox though. With cover pages of magazines, the article has to talk specifically about that magazine cover in order for us to be able to use it under a fair use reasoning. And we can't use the cover in the infobox of a person just because they happen to be on the cover. I know this fairly well since I've gone through the exact same issue many times before with other articles. If you have any questions, let me know. Dismas |(talk) 02:51, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cover for Penthouse Magazine September 2011. Picture of Emily Addison.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Cover for Penthouse Magazine September 2011. Picture of Emily Addison.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:54, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Emily Addison for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emily Addison is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Emily Addison & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz Humbug! 18:42, 16 May 2013 (UTC)