User talk:WolfHound35th

January 2024
Hello, I'm Chaotic Enby. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Sarah Godlewski have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 03:31, 14 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Truth is constructive WolfHound35th (talk) 03:33, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Verifiability, not truth and Biographies of living persons are good things to read. Chaotıċ Enby  (talk · contribs) 03:50, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * https://www.ferc.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/civil-penalties/actions/138FERC61168.pdf WolfHound35th (talk) 03:53, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Please stop removing publicly available pertinent information WolfHound35th (talk) 03:36, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sarah Godlewski. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 03:34, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Sarah Godlewski. Thank you. Beccaynr (talk) 03:36, 14 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Please stop removing publicly available pertinent information WolfHound35th (talk) 03:37, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Can you help me post this referenced information from a government agency? https://www.ferc.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/civil-penalties/actions/138FERC61168.pdf WolfHound35th (talk) 03:43, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * WolfHoud35th, there are policies about when and how information can be added about living people, especially if it is controversial. You can discuss this further on the article talk page, and offer sources to be considered, so this can be further discussed. However, now that it is clear that there are objections to the content, it is also not appropriate to continue edit-warring by repeatedly adding the disputed content into the article. You can also ask questions at the Teahouse about this, where there are editors who can answer further questions. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 03:43, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * It’s public information by a USA government agency! WolfHound35th (talk) 03:43, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Hired a professional Wikipedia editor to ensure changes meet every and all guidelines. WolfHound35th (talk) 03:52, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi! Please do not hire someone calling themselves "professional Wikipedia editor" and making you pay for their services, that's 100% a scam. Chaotıċ Enby  (talk · contribs) 04:02, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Schrödinger's jellyfish. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of Sarah Godlewski. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Schrödinger's jellyfish &#9993; 03:43, 14 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Will move. WolfHound35th (talk) 03:44, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi WolfHound35th! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Sarah Godlewski several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Beccaynr (talk) 04:25, 14 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Appreciate your time. 2600:1700:50E:9490:390F:D30F:287F:1746 (talk) 15:04, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * You've replied from an IP account. Was it an accident? Chaotıċ Enby  (talk · contribs) 15:08, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * No idea? WolfHound35th (talk) 01:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)