User talk:Wolfboy21

Hi there. Welcome to the 'pedia. When you get a chance, drop us a note at New user log to introduce yourself. You should also feel free to drop me a question on my talk page.
 * You can sign your name on talk pages by using " " for your username and " ~ " for your username and a timestamp.
 * The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good easy-to-follow guide to editing Wikipedia.
 * Welcome is another good place to start.
 * How does one edit a page gives editing help.
 * Manual of Style gives formatting info.
 * Policies and guidelines tell about the principles we operate on. It's important, but don't try to read it all now.
 * Help covers a broad range of useful topics.
 * Help desk is a good place to ask questions.
 * Show preview explains how to double-check your edits before saving.

Happy editing, L UDRAMAN | T 19:26, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Amputation: Texts for an Extraordinary Spectacle
Hello, I have proposed this article, which you created, for deletion, as it does not seem to be about a notable play. If you think otherwise, please go to Amputation: Texts for an Extraordinary Spectacle and follow the instructions there; in particular, it would help if you could cite a reliable source mentioning this play. Have a nice day, --Zvika (talk) 15:20, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * As requested, User:Wolfboy21/Amputation: Texts for an Extraordinary Spectacle. AGK 15:07, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

RESPONSE: An encyclopedia is supposed to be filled with KNOWLEDGE, not NOTABILITY. Works of art, poetry, publications, movies, etc., should be listed as existing, otherwise they will never have the opportunity to BE notable in the future!

Conflict of interest
On the talk page for Addictive Aversions you ask "What is the problem with this article? I am one of the editors at Xenos Books and have used our catalog description for the book. Please advise. Wolfboy21@bolt.com"' Well, that is the problem. As an editor employed by Xenos Books, you should probably not edit any articles related to Xenos Books on Wikipedia, as it will be difficult for you to provide a neutral point of view (for example, negative reviews in the proper context). For more information, please see Conflict_of_interest. Using catalog descriptions is not appropriate, as they are written as advertisements. (See WP:PROMOTION) Articles also need to meet notability guidelines. --Martinship (talk) 17:57, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Wolfboy21! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created  is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 10:55, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Daryl F. Mallett -

Proposed deletion of The Mad Kokoschka: A Play in Three Acts


The article The Mad Kokoschka: A Play in Three Acts has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * non notable play, can find no reliable sources to confirm notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:00, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Animal World for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Animal World is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Animal World until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ansh 666 03:12, 30 August 2016 (UTC)