User talk:Wolfhale

March 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dorothea Dix has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:13, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dorothea Dix was changed by Wolfhale (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.9192 on 2016-03-09T18:13:38+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Margaret Sanger. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:22, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Margaret Sanger was changed by Wolfhale (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956879 on 2016-03-09T18:21:55+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Horace Mann. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. David Brooks (talk) 19:01, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Your most recent edit, to Charles Grandison Finney, suggests you are using your changes as a sting operation on your students. Please do not do that. Millions of people use Wikipedia as a source of information, and intentionally including bad data is antithetical to its purpose. There are plenty of freely available plagiarism detectors, such as Turnitin. David Brooks (talk) 19:49, 9 March 2016 (UTC)