User talk:Wolflone85

Welcome!
Hello, Wolflone85, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Your first article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
 * Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
 * and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place  on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 08:57, 5 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much for the warm welcome. I am still learning and visiting the pages you suggested. Wikipedia is a wonderful place and I will try to contribute with as much accuracy and hard work as I can. Thanks again for making me feel belonged here. Wolflone85 (talk) 06:22, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023
Hello, I'm Callanecc. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:35, 9 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for pointing out Callanecc. I appreciate your guidance and support, I am still learning and will make sure the mistakes are not repeated. I will be adding the sources on the article for references next. Cheers. Wolflone85 (talk) 08:08, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Steve Waugh
Please discuss any further additions about his all-round prowess on his article talk page before making changes. I think they are stretching things and not giving a neutral point of view. I don't want to get stuck in a revert war over this.Spike &#39;em (talk) 13:02, 9 January 2023 (UTC)


 * I'll second this. I've not looked at the balance of the article properly yet, but if we can come to an agreement over this it'll benefit everyone Blue Square Thing (talk) 13:59, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, if we look at the number of total wickets taken in ODIs and tests along with the total runs he scored in both formats, the record easily is one of the best all-round records in history. My point was that despite he stopped bowling much after the injury, his record still stands as one of the best all-round records. Thanks for checking and I appreciate your inputs Spike 'em(talk) and Blue Square Thing(talk). Wolflone85 (talk) 20:51, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Checkovid
Hi @Wolflone85. Unfortunately the draft you created is not ready to be moved to mainspace. Of the two references, neither mention the short movie, and IMDb cannot be used to establish notability under WP:NFILM.

I have moved this back to draftspace and it is not yet currently submitted for review. If it were submitted in it's current state it would be declined.  Qcne  (talk)  15:37, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Checkovid
Hello, Wolflone85. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Checkovid, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:07, 1 June 2024 (UTC)