User talk:Wolfy123

Speedy deletion of Royal Stalkers United
A tag has been placed on Royal Stalkers United requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. FlyingToaster (talk) 05:57, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Stop
Please stop adding "Royal Stalkers United" to RSU. If you continue, this and any other account you are using may be blocked. Okiefromokla questions? 01:32, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Riskopoly
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Riskopoly, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.orgs.ttu.edu/legionwest/riskopoly.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:33, 26 October 2008 (UTC)