User talk:WolverineHistorian

Welcome!
Hello, WolverineHistorian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * Getting Started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

December 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=586969313 your edit] to Howard Markel may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:35, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * 2105/AJPH.77.2.219 When it Rains it Pours: Endemic Goiter, Iodized Salt, and David Murray Cowie, MD and The Lancet to The New York Times, Harper's Magazine, ''[[The

Disambiguation link notification for January 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Howard Markel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Residency (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Dr. Howard Markel, black and white photograph.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dr. Howard Markel, black and white photograph.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 18:16, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Howard Markel.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Howard Markel.jpg, which you've attributed to. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ron h jones (Talk) 19:42, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:HowardMarkel, headshot.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:HowardMarkel, headshot.jpg, which you've attributed to. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ron h jones (Talk) 19:42, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:LL Markel.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:LL Markel.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ///Euro Car GT  21:42, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Howard Markel
Book synopses cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:58, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bonnie S. Glaser has been accepted
 Bonnie S. Glaser, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Missvain (talk) 23:30, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Bonnie_S._Glaser help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Disambiguation link notification for June 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Howard Markel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CDC ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Howard_Markel check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Howard_Markel?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Howard Markel, you may be blocked from editing. ''This edit is seriously disruptive, particularly since it is you who seems to have the conflict of interest. Please see WP:DISCLOSE. Thank you. '' Drmies (talk) 01:40, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

All of my edits have been sourced. I have also removed some of the "puffery." I am interested in continuing to make the necessary edits to that all content is accurate and noteworthy. Your recent edit removing content from, and changing the section title of COVID-19 back to Sars-COV2, is removing both accurate and noteworthy information and as well as replacing it with less accurate information (the section title should be COVID-19). Please work with me on finding an appropriate resolution. Thank you. WolverineHistorian (talk) 01:46, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Howard Markel. Drmies (talk) 02:01, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

I am not using the Howard Markel template for advertising! Adding sourced and newsworthy information about expert dissemination of information and knowledge concerning the COVID-19 outbreak is NOT advertising. You should specify which material you find to be promotional WolverineHistorian (talk) 02:13, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

For example  - Reflecting the significance of the widespread "social distancing" which took effect during the pandemic, on April 22, 2020 The New York Times chronicled the concept's origins. The article illustrated how Markel and other researchers worked for years "to overcome skepticism and make it federal policy.  -- linking a SOURCED ARTICLE about how the subject worked to make "social distancing" federal policy is hardly advertising! Please explain your justification for deleting this relevant information   WolverineHistorian (talk) 02:16, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 23:39, 7 June 2020 (UTC)