User talk:Wombat1138

A welcome from Andy Shen
Hi,, Welcome  to Wikipedia! I'm Andy Shen. I noticed that you were new and/or have yet to receive any messages so I just thought I'd pop in to say "hello". We're glad to have you in our community! I hope you like this place &mdash; I sure do &mdash; and want to stay. Wikipedia can be a little intimidating at first, since it's so big but we won't bite so Be Bold and get what you know down in microchips! If you do make a mistake, that's fine, we'll assume good faith and just correct you: it'll take a few seconds maximum! Here, however, are a few links to get you started:


 * If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary

---

Additional tips
Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!


 * I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.
 * If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
 * You can sign your name using three tildes (~). If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
 * You may want to add yourself to the new user log.
 * If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
 * If you're still entirely confused, or would like to get a better grasp of your wikipedia skills, and you have an IRC client (or don't mind getting one), check out the Bootcamp. It's not what it sounds like, but it is fun and can help you with your editing skills.
 * If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.
 * P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Happy Wiki-ing.
- Andy Shen

Speedy deletion of Songs of the Cat
A tag has been placed on Songs of the Cat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Mike . lifeguard  &#124; @en.wb 03:41, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Mel Odom (artist)
A tag has been placed on Mel Odom (artist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Toddst1 (talk) 01:51, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

December 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 15:15, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi again-- is there a general stylistic preference to place notes at the end of a sentence, rather than directly attaching them to the information in question? If so, would it be acceptable to reword the section intro to pop the "Ran clan" phrase into a separate sentence? because imho, the current placement of the note would suggest to the unwary reader that it documents the relative status of both clans, rather than pertaining to the Hong/Kō clan alone. Wombat1138 (talk) 02:40, 15 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes, in general, notes/refs are placed at the end of the sentences. The only time they are usually stuck in the middle of a sentence is at the end of a direct quote where it may not be clear which source the quote comes from (i.e. a sentence has multiple references). It keeps the sentences more readable visually. That said, I've removed "second to the Ran clan" since that isn't really needed anyway :P As a side note, please don't leave new comments in talk page archives. Those are primarily intended to be "read only" rather than a place for new remarks. You can either leave a note on my main talk page, or reply here since your talk page is on my watchlist as well. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 02:47, 15 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Oops-- sorry about that... also, thanks for the Manual of Style link; I hadn't noticed it until just now. Two more questions about the main paragraph: should "Saiunkoku" really be italicized there, as a reference to the external fictional framework rather than the narrative-internal country? And is the British-style collective-noun/plural-verb combo of "the Hong clan [...] are" acceptable usage here? (For that matter, I'm torn between tweaking the note to "English-language R1 DVDs" to remove possible ambiguity wrt DVDs released in England, even though those would be R2, or just removing the word "English" altogether since R1 DVDs default to English-language anyway.) Wombat1138 (talk) 03:06, 15 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Ahh...I didn't realize the fictional country was Saiunkoku as well. In which case, no, they don't need italics. Fixed that and the grammar. I tweaked the note as well. Were the DVDs released in England? If so, they have the same name change or do they use the original name? --  Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 03:33, 15 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Amazon.co.uk only lists the R1s, so I assume this means there wasn't any official release in England-- which would theoretically remove any question about English-langugage US R1 vs. English-nationality UK R2, at least wrt Geneon licensing. OTOH there could be bootleg R2s out there with English subtitles (shrug), but the ambiguity just bugs me @_@ Wombat1138 (talk) 17:23, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * We don't care about bootlegs anyway. But I tweaked the language so it should now be clearer. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 17:35, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Maia
I think you had a good point about Zirek and Meris in Maia (novel). I added them, though I'm really not sure it's a good idea to add a subplot. Another method would be just something like "With the two freed prisoners and the assassins who killed Sencho, she flees..."

I enjoy writing these things, but does anyone read them? I wonder. &mdash;JerryFriedman (Talk) 06:23, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The most compelling reason for most people to read plot summaries is probably as a shortcut for schoolwork, but there's always hope of gaining interest from new recreational readers as well. I'm amazed that Maia hasn't been reprinted recently, since it would probably have good crossover appeal for fans of Jacqueline Carey's "Kushiel" series. --Wombat1138 (talk) 02:02, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Manganese glass under UV.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Manganese glass under UV.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Radiant chains (talk) 06:29, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Wombat1138! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:29, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Shinji Yamaguchi -

Orphaned non-free image File:Ktree.GIF
 Thanks for uploading File:Ktree.GIF. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Ktree3.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Ktree3.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 14:07, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ktree3.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:Ktree3.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:26, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Pictures in commons
Hi I noticed you put in some pictures for the article tamatebako. If you set up an account on wiki commons and upload pictures there it makes it easy for all wikis to use the pictures. Here for instance is some origami pictures on commons commons:category:Origami. Any pictures uploaded there must have no copyright problems restricting their use so no company logos or suchlike. The pictures can be used in wikipedia without any special prefix just as though they were uploaded here. Pictures here which have a permissive copyright will normally migrate to commons after a while but it is pretty slow. Dmcq (talk) 09:15, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Burrito
Great job adding the usage and source. How did you find it? Viriditas (talk) 20:50, 17 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Plugging keywords into Google Books' 19th-century search, basically. --Wombat1138 (talk) 21:07, 18 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Excellent find. When you have a moment, would you take a look at Timeline of the Burrito?  I'm trying to merge relevant information into the history of the burrito section you've been working on, and could use some help.  Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 23:15, 20 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Looks like I succeeded in missing most of the carnage over there :| I've resumed poking around through Google Books' 19th-century stash, which seems to have some interesting proto-burrito references such as this 1887 ref, which uses the word tamal to describe something that sounds more like a burrito-- "chopped meat, tomatoes, and chile wrapped in a (pre-baked) tortilla" rather than solid tamales that've been wrapped in leaves and steamed-- but that might be sliding into irrelevant territory. --Wombat1138 (talk) 21:08, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shinji Yamaguchi


The article Shinji Yamaguchi has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:N Unable to find reliable, secondary sources providing significant coverage of this manga illustrator in order to evidence notablity under the general notability guideline.  Additional sources welcome as always.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. joe deckertalk to me 02:50, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

George Bogle's children
Hello Wombat1138, this is in relation to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=George_Bogle_%28diplomat%29&diff=prev&oldid=380754450 where you say that Bogle's children married in Scotland. I am now editing Narratives of the mission of George Bogle to Tibet.djvu and I cannot find anything about his children, while Markham clearly states that he knows one lineage that survived, that of Mrs Martha Brown, George Bogle's sister. I would like to know more about Bogle's children. Maybe this fits into the wikipedia article as well. Tar-ba-gan (talk) 16:15, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Songs of the Cat


The article Songs of the Cat has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unref"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jax 0677 (talk) 02:51, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Keopuolani tree.png
Thanks for uploading File:Keopuolani tree.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 12:54, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Manganese glass under UV.jpg


The file File:Manganese glass under UV.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of The Story of Saiunkoku characters for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of The Story of Saiunkoku characters, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/List of The Story of Saiunkoku characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 9 July 2022 (UTC)