User talk:Wombatbuddy

July 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Puzzle Bobble has been reverted. Your edit here to Puzzle Bobble was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngQQOjZNpxY) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:39, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Puzzle Bobble shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  17:04, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Your edits to Puzzle Bobble
Please do not re-add the content regarding "Unlimited time mode." Multiple users have reverted this addition because it is not written clearly enough for anyone to understand. When your addition is reverted on Wikipedia, the appropriate way to proceed is to start a new section on the article's talk page (in this case, Talk:Puzzle Bobble), and explain why you believe your content improves the article. In this case, I recommend that you put your proposed addition on the talk page so that someone with better written English can edit it appropriately before adding it to the article. If you re-add the content to the article again, however, I will have to address this at the edit-warring notice board and you may be blocked from editing. I hope you will comply with Wikipedia's policies so that I won't have to do that. Thanks. -  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  17:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bust-A-Move (video game)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Bust-A-Move (video game) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:17, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for making this article! In case you haven't noticed, there is a certain tendency for empty articles to get deleted right away. I've made a note at the top to get you some more time, but if it is deleted before you're done please don't take it personally! Please feel free to recreate the article; it will likely fare better if you get it done – or at least get it to a state where it is a coherent standalone article (see wp:STUB) bofore clicking on "save page". Let me know if I can help with anything, and again, thanks! ErikHaugen (talk &#124; contribs) 23:21, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Wombatbuddy (talk) 23:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Responding to your concerns
1. For future reference, the standard way to leave a message on a user's talk page is to start a new section (using the "New section" tab at the top right of the talk page) at the BOTTOM of the user's talk page. Otherwise, the user may have a difficult time finding it. It's also extremely important to sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (the ~ character) in a row, or, even more easily, by using the "Sign your posts on talk pages" button at the center bottom of the editing screen. When you click on "Show preview" or "Save changes," you'll see your signature instead of the four ~ marks.

2. "Multiple" users have, indeed, deleted your contributions:  I did, and another editor did too. I can't speak for the other editor, but I deleted them because your written English had so many errors and was so difficult to understand that I couldn't tell what you were trying to say. That's why I suggested, in my message on your talk page, that you create a post on the article talk page (not my user talk page, or your own user talk page) setting out the change you want to make in the article so that editors interested in the article can try to get the idea into encyclopedic form with correct syntax. I also suggest that you start learning to edit Wikipedia by doing so at the Wikipedia in your native language.

3. Your deleted contributions are still part of the article's history, if you want to work on editing them outside of live article space. All you have to do is go to the "View history" tab at the top right of the article page and click on the date and time of the revision you want to look at; from there, you can copy the deleted article text using Ctrl-C and paste it into a sandbox (you can create one of these using the "Sandbox" link at the very top right of the screen, between "Talk" and "Preferences").

4. Please keep in mind that all of us here are volunteers, who work on the site when we have a few extra minutes during the day. Impatiently leaving more messages in the hopes of getting a quicker response is not likely to be a successful strategy.

5. If you don't agree with me, or have further questions, about any of these issues, the editors at WP:SANDBOX are very good at answering questions for newer editors and at providing second opinions regarding issues like those I've discussed here.

Thanks for your attention. -  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  23:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bust-A-Move Cover Art.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bust-A-Move Cover Art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 12 May 2018 (UTC)